User User name Password  
   
Friday 4.7.2008 / 11:45 AM
Search:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > new ip law would create new u.s. copyright enforcement agency
Show topics
News
News

New IP law would create new U.S. copyright enforcement agency

12 December 2007 0:57 by Rich "vurbal" Fiscus | 33 comments

New IP law would create new U.S. copyright enforcement agency A bill introduced in the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives with bipartisan support would expand the scope of Intellectual Property (IP) enforcement by Federal officials through the creation of a new division of the Department of Justice for the job.

According to the announcement from House Judiciary Committee chairman John Conyers the bill would create an office called 'The Office of the United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Representative in the Executive Office of the President' (the law enforcement center of the Federal Government) responsible for enforcing IP law both domestically and internationally. On the domestic front, it even mandates that the new IP Enforcement division be responsible for prosecuting civil cases on behalf of intellectual property owners, many of which are multi-billion dollar corporations.

The bill also increases both criminal and civil penalties for IP infringement, as well as adding forfeiture of computer equipment used for such infringement by the IP Enforcement office.

Bloggers across the internet have attacked the bill as draconian, many seeing a direct relationship to comments made earlier this year by NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker that the creation of such an agency is critical to the well being of the country's economy.

A statement from NBC Universal regarding the current Judiciary Committee bill said “Piracy and counterfeiting have become a worldwide pandemic of crime. If we are to turn the tide, we must significantly step up our effort to protect intellectual property on many fronts. The bold mandate in this legislation for high-level executive leadership–starting at the White House and the Department of Justice–and for dedicated prosecutorial, investigative and international resources will dramatically advance the cause of protecting U.S. innovation, technological invention and creativity.”

Meanwhile a group of 25 prominent law professors from around the country sent a letter to Representative Conyers decrying the bill as unfair because of the threefold increase in civil penalties introduced.

Sources:
Variety
CNet News
Law Professors' Letter To Representative Conyers
Digital Daily

Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • Three strikes law for internet piracy to be proposed in Britain (12 February 2008)
  • Scottish government to insert ads in video games (24 December 2007)
  • DOJ not happy about proposed IP law (15 December 2007)
  • Microsoft continues fight against piracy (11 December 2007)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    Netflix may face increased postage due to mailer design
    Next news article »
    DivX says Merry Christmas with free DivX Pro bundle
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article!  There are more user comments available, read them here
    spydah (Junior Member) 12 December 2007 8:50 Send private message to this user   
    The US is in a sad state right now. They are killing us with these bogus laws they are passing under the table.
    jacsac (Member) 12 December 2007 11:50 Send private message to this user   
    These kinds of laws do exactly the opposite of what they are intended to do. If people are already breaking the law in the eyes of these fools, people will just take the next step and use file sharing. Is the theory then, if you want music on a mp3 player you have to buy that as well?
    tin23uk (Junior Member) 12 December 2007 12:07 Send private message to this user   
    its just the mpaa and riaa looking for federal backing, this way they will get government funding and tougher punishments for copyright infringments.
    shummyr (Member) 12 December 2007 12:26 Send private message to this user   
    this is nuts thats what we get for screwed up politicians
    Net Nuetrality For LIFE
    shummyr (Member) 12 December 2007 12:46 Send private message to this user   
    they should shootthis down 10000 miles from us borders

    My Modded Army PSP PHAT M33-3, Xbox 1 Softmodded, Xbox 360 Samsung 1.2 recision C, PS2+ MC Exploit+HD Loader and HD Advance, DS+R4Ds+2Gb and
    Soon To Get WII+ D2C Key
    IF any Help is needed Pm ME
    tester22 (Inactive) 12 December 2007 12:55 Send private message to this user   
    If there is one thing I couldn't agree MORE with, it's what 'vert' said......

    "First they are alienating the entire world against them. Get the hell out of Iraq. Secondly, they want to impose their laws on the rest of the world. George Bush is leading America into what could be a third world war."

    I respect opinions but this is not an opinion.....it's a fact. And if you are a political enthusiast that is SO BLIND and SO DIE HARD "Republican" and Pro-Bush then it's time we (America) start stoning people again, beginning with the aforementioned. I lost a bunch of friends when Bush was up for re-election because they were soooooo blind and sooooo Republican-bound that they didn't care what the President stood for............so long as they were Repubs. and I shunned them for voting for him. Now everyone I know that voted again for him is regretting it. How can people say that's what the system is all about? It's the GD BEST PERSON FOR THE JOB!!! Dem. or Rep. or Independent. Generally looking towards the lesser of the two evils. I am frankly scared to live in the country and if the opportunity presented itself, I'd move to England, Australia or CANADA (with a frakkin' stronger dollar for the first time in like 93 years!!!) in a heartbeat. I love what this country was founded on ............ I hate what this country has become.
    DXR88 (Member) 12 December 2007 12:58 Send private message to this user   
    heh. i break the law everyday. i speed on the way to work. i run an average of 5 stop signs a day. i shoot guns inside city limits. i dont wear a seat belt. i drink and drive. i smoke inside a no smoking zone. and you think that i give a rats 4$$ about some bill telling me not to do it. ill do it anyway cause i know there are only so many law Enforcer's in this world and if everybody does it there wont be any law enforcer to stop me now will there.

    logic is logic. the states are playing children games that have zero logic. (the states of america>> bang bang your dead). (average american with logic>> i am but no high speed projectile hit me ow well 30 more gigs of music to go)

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 12 December 2007 13:00

    skeil909 (Newbie) 12 December 2007 13:01 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    will dramatically advance the cause of protecting U.S. innovation, technological invention and creativity.
    What they are passing will do no such thing. It will further hinder and stifle new innovation, invention and creativity. Furthermore, it will deplete their pocketbook, I gurantee sales will not rise with any of these bogus laws in place. People cannot buy what they cannot afford, it's as simple as that.
    paragon32 (Newbie) 12 December 2007 13:16 Send private message to this user   
    What it will do is exactly what it's meant to:
    1) It will remove liability from the RIAA or whoever is currently prosecuting because even if you're proven innocent, good luck trying to win a case against the federal government.
    2) If they actually criminalize it on a personal level, it means that there will be alot of fines handed out in addition to any liability to the RIAA/etc.
    In some form this is going to likely pass sooner or later, there is too much lobbiest money for it not to.
    And to think, America is no thought of as a free country(atleast by those inside it who won't believe anything but what is on the idiot box.)
    BcMester (Newbie) 12 December 2007 17:49 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    ...comments made earlier this year by [...] Jeff Zucker that the creation of such an agency is critical to the well being of the country's economy.
    This sentence would be more accurate like this:
    Quote:
    ...comments made earlier this year by [...] Jeff Zucker that the creation of such an agency is critical to the well being of Jeff Zucker and the rest of his kind.
    tester22 (Inactive) 12 December 2007 18:19 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by paragon32:
    What it will do is exactly what it's meant to:
    1) It will remove liability from the RIAA or whoever is currently prosecuting because even if you're proven innocent, good luck trying to win a case against the federal government.
    2) If they actually criminalize it on a personal level, it means that there will be alot of fines handed out in addition to any liability to the RIAA/etc.
    In some form this is going to likely pass sooner or later, there is too much lobbiest money for it not to.
    And to think, America is no thought of as a free country(atleast by those inside it who won't believe anything but what is on the idiot box.)



    And increase prison overcrowding. Everybody and their frggin' grannies will be in jail. And I mean the friggin' grannies too.........."Eh sonny......what's that sonny........you caught me downloadin' a pirated copy of Mary Poppins????"
    Blackjax (Member) 13 December 2007 3:39 Send private message to this user   
    Follow the money trail folks. You buy a cd/dvd from said media company, company in turns "buys" politician, company "asks" politiciains to help "save their dying business model" by creating another government dept. that will be paid for buy taxpayers to jail said taxpayers when they break the "new" "laws" that will ocming next.


    hmmmm..... makes you wonder where all the common sense in the world has gone... gone with the wind... ooops guess I'll be sued for using something that was trademarked over a half century ago!
    ali2007 (Inactive) 13 December 2007 10:24 Send private message to this user   
    in the the year 2008 govt will approve how much we foulness removed, i am tired of this crap foulness removed

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13 December 2007 10:43

    LOCOENG (Moderator) 13 December 2007 10:42 Send private message to this user   
    ali2007,

    I'm tired of editing posts of foul mouthed kiddies.

    Quote:
    6. No foul language, insults, personal attacks or otherwise rude messages.


    morguex (Inactive) 13 December 2007 12:50 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by DXR88:
    heh. i break the law everyday. i speed on the way to work. i run an average of 5 stop signs a day. i shoot guns inside city limits. i dont wear a seat belt. i drink and drive.
    I hope your kidding.
    DXR88 (Member) 13 December 2007 12:55 Send private message to this user   
    Unfutunatly Not, to drink and drive is not bad it when your drunk that it becomes a hazard
    oofRome (Senior Member) 13 December 2007 14:19 Send private message to this user   
    I love how "with bipartisan support" was mentioned to try to stem the political onslaught of "anti-bush/anti-dem" comments... only to end in failure. It was in the very first sentence, and it still went over people's heads.
    tester22 (Inactive) 13 December 2007 14:29 Send private message to this user   
    NO DOUBT!!!............if you're not kidding then watch out for my arse on the road. I'm a auto-vigilante. Drive like that around me and I'll run you off the road and make it look like an accident covering my own ass. ;) I like to think of myself as a 'lesson teacher'.

    "foul - mouthed kiddies".............I don't understand, they get away with it ALL THE TIME, yet I said one measly word once and was banned. Be nice and fair Mr. Moderator and of course, Happy Holidays.
    tester22 (Inactive) 13 December 2007 14:33 Send private message to this user   
    Off topic here but drinking one, then two then three then four drinks is how it works before getting on the road. Regular peeps can't be trusted with that decision making (except those like me). Germany has "no tolerance" law. 0 drinks pal. Catching a 'buzz' is no good either............unless you're one of the many damn fools who somehow delude themselves into thinking they drive better under the influence. Shame!
    morguex (Inactive) 13 December 2007 16:21 Send private message to this user   
    Again off topic, But DRX88, you don;t have to be drunk to kill someone or mame them. Your luck will run out my friend.
    It will be too late for remorse and tears then.
    D40 (Newbie) 13 December 2007 19:11 Send private message to this user   
    They are just a bunch of greedy bastards. They already make more money that God, and all they want is more money and more power. It's worse than a heroin addiction. I hope that at some point the technology becomes so advanced that the works of everyday people will be of such a high quality that these big media studios and record companies will be just a humorous memory.
    DXR88 (Member) 14 December 2007 11:01 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by morguex:
    Again off topic, But DRX88, you don;t have to be drunk to kill someone or mame them. Your luck will run out my friend.
    It will be too late for remorse and tears then.
    Mhm i only mentioned it because its gonna be like that for ever. if they make it illeagle to sell or even own a copy you go to jail. its all the nonsence the authorities are being pulled for why is it required that 4 cops be at a fire when there not needed its nonsense.

    there are drugs passing by but there to busy paying attention to all this nonsence...
    JRude (Junior Member) 14 December 2007 17:54 Send private message to this user   
    If you follow the news you will notice the government agencies are increasingly supporting the Entertainment Industry...an EXCELLENT source for election funds! Does the FCC protect the consumers, or allow monopolistic radio air wave buying. Does the Dept. Of Justice side with consumers or the Industry? The Industry is the new and most powerful 4th Branch of US Government. Western Digital makes a market testing DRM HD. ISP's install NSA snooping hardware. ALL traffic can be read on the internet by 7 level packet sniffers. Control the means of communication and you control the population. I doubt the USA would fall if ALL the Entertainment Industry went bankrupt (Which it surely is not!) But the Industry needs funds to replace what it lost to PIRATING politicians of their profit base. Get out the foil caps and cover your ass! 'Cause I'll probably be sniffed out and targeted now! lol!
    ivymike (Junior Member) 15 December 2007 1:55 Send private message to this user   
    I'd like to know the names of the politicians involved who support this bill.
    borhan9 (AfterDawn Addict) 23 December 2007 21:10 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    'The Office of the United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Representative in the Executive Office of the President' (the law enforcement center of the Federal Government)
    That is one long name for a crap part of the U.S law system no offense but couldn't they think of something shorter. :)
    ivymike (Junior Member) 23 December 2007 21:26 Send private message to this user   
    At the rate we are going, pretty soon, taking a shit on the Sabbath will be against the law.

    The US government preaches about the benefits of new technologies but bristles when it's not their liking.

    Loyalty to the country always; Loyalty to the government when it deserves it.
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums | DVD X Copy Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi | fin.MP3Lizard.com
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2008 by AfterDawn Ltd.