User User name Password  
   
Sunday 5.7.2009 / 12:02 AM
Search:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > ifpi annual report praises labels for being forced to ditch drm
Show topics
News
News

IFPI annual report praises labels for being forced to ditch DRM

24 January 2008 23:20 by Rich "vurbal" Fiscus | 6 comments

IFPI annual report praises labels for being forced to ditch DRM According to the IFPI's annual report on the music industry, released today, it was innovative labels, rather than frustrated consumers or knowledgable online store management who came up with the DRM-free music model that's taking over online music sales. It's an apparent bid to rewrite history, in which they were actually dragged kicking and screaming into the DRM-free marketplace. In fact, last year's report describe DRM as "the enabler of flexible music offerings."

The IFPI is also pulling no punches in their campaign to turn ISPs into their proxies in the fight against internet piracy. opens with a section titled "Making ISP Responsibility A Reality." Interestingly, however, the report also features another section highlighting the mobile music market in Japan, in which that coiuntry is characterized as "setting a fascinating example to the rest of the world."

If nothing else it's certainly fascinating that the report would be giving so much praise to the online market in a country where according to the report "One key reason for Japan’s digital market success has been the formation of a mobile music retail service jointly owned by record companies." This is unlike the U.S., E.U., or other areas of the world where music executives aparently expect other companies, like Apple and Amazon, to build their new distribution model for them.

Permalink to this article | Topics:

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • French parliament expected to vote on 3-strikes anti-piracy bill in the fall (20 June 2008)
  • U2's manager once again decries ISP's for not policing subscribers (4 June 2008)
  • RIAA representative forecasts a comeback for DRM (8 May 2008)
  • Australia falling in line with music industry talking points (19 February 2008)
  • Google will enter online music sector in China (14 February 2008)
  • Play.com goes DRM-free in the UK (13 February 2008)
  • Three strikes law for internet piracy to be proposed in Britain (12 February 2008)
  • Amazon invests in DVD rental service (4 February 2008)
  • U2's manager: time to end ISPs' free ride (30 January 2008)
  • Verizon VP says no plans to examine customer traffic (30 January 2008)
  • EU court shoots down attempt to force ISP disclosure of customer data (29 January 2008)
  • France to mandate ISP monitoring of customers for copyright infringement (29 January 2008)
  • Amazon MP3 to go international in 2008 (27 January 2008)
  • GTA IV was delayed because of PlayStation 3 (25 January 2008)
  • Napster to offer DRM-free downloads (7 January 2008)
  • Sony BMG drops DRM in digital downloads (7 January 2008)
  • Warner adds its catalogue to Amazon MP3 store (27 December 2007)
  • Do DRM free downloads mean innovation in online music? (15 October 2007)
  • Amazon opens its DRM-free music store (25 September 2007)
  • Universal tries out DRM free downloads (10 August 2007)
  • DRM-free EMI catalogue arrives on iTunes (30 May 2007)
  • Executive sees end of DRM in music files (26 April 2007)
  • Music downloaders willing to pay more for DRM-free downloads? (14 April 2007)
  • Warner unhappy with DRM-free downloads (14 April 2007)
  • EMI opts to keep DRM (26 February 2007)
  • Macrovision responds to Steve Jobs' open letter (18 February 2007)
  • Music execs criticize digital rights management (14 February 2007)
  • Warner rejects Apple's DRM proposal (9 February 2007)
  • Jobs: Apple would offer DRM-free downloads if allowed (7 February 2007)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    Suspected virus author in Japan arrested for copyright infringement
    Next news article »
    P2P downloads outshine digital sales 20:1
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    Blackjax (Member) 25 January 2008 0:04 Send private message to this user   
    As I read this article I happened to look over and see my dog chasing his tail.....
    My ribs now hurt too much to continue typing!
    maryjayne (Junior Member) 25 January 2008 8:22 Send private message to this user   
    My dog eventually learned if you sit down after spinning a few times, then you can actually catch your tail. Now I get my kicks from watching the carpet butt drag scratch. Sometimes I join him with a good scratch :-)

    Back to the article:
    DRM sux.
    Apple sux.
    ISPs forced into babysitting their customers will drop their customer base and cause more private ISPs to emerge.
    The US has a business model of let another company develop the ideas that you want and then when they start to become successful then buy them out. Less work than trying to develop the concepts yourself!
    nobrainer (Inactive) 25 January 2008 12:14 Send private message to this user   
    And the record industry rhetoric continues as per usual!

    RE: forcing internet isp's to monitor for copywrited material.
    this will last for about 30 seconds until all bittorrent clients use encryption, failing the you could always use an encrypted tunnel or a vpn and it even stops all that crappy traffic shaping!

    Optimize BitTorrent To Outwit Traffic Shaping ISPs

    Originally posted by hyperlink:
    How To Encrypt to Your BitTorrent Transfers:
    The RC4 encryption offered by many popular BitTorrent clients today will obfuscate not only the header but the entire stream, which makes it considerably more difficult for an ISP to detect that you're using BitTorrent. Even if your ISP does not force you to enable encryption, you may be connecting to peers with ISPs that do.

    Encryption began appearing on clients in late 2005. By the end of 2006, most actively-developed clients were updated with encryption. While not all torrent clients in a swarm will support encryption, most of them will. As a result, this small percentage of non-encryption capable peers may be a reason not to force encryption on a full-time basis, but there is no reason not to enable encryption that allows the falling back to a non-encrypted connection when needed.

    If your favorite client is not listed below, check your documentation.


    How To Hide BitTorrent within an Encrypted Tunnel:

    With the advent of Application-Layer Inspection, some ISPs may recognize and control BitTorrent traffic despite your best efforts.

    You may be able to hide the BitTorrent traffic in an encrypted tunnel -- a transport path within the normal transport paths provided by TCP and IP. You can tunnel your traffic through cooperatives such as The Onion Router (TOR)* or I2P. Commercial Virtual Private Network (VPN) providers such as Relakks or SecureIX will also help keep your ISP from detecting exactly what you're doing. If you are familiar with SSH and SSH Tunneling, this is also a possibility. However, some ISPs even throttle or inhibit these encrypted tunnels.

    Azureus provides in-client support for TOR and I2P. Other clients will have to set up the software as recommend on the TOR or I2P site.

    *Note: TOR has been updated to allow peer-to-peer download data, despite any information to the contrary (it used to be prohibited).


    and how easy is it to set up uTorrent tunnel you ask? well its this easy!




    http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnion...OWTO/BitTorrent



    The BPI Are: SONY, UNIVERSAL, WARNER GROUP, EMI.

    The RIAA Soundexchange Are: SONY, UNIVERSAL, WARNER GROUP, EMI.

    The MPAA Are: SONY, UNIVERSAL, WARNER GROUP, DISNEY, PARAMOUNT, FOX.
    banned4Lf (Inactive) 25 January 2008 12:34 Send private message to this user   
    HUH?!.?!.?!.?!.?!.?!.

    "Praising DRM-free music"?????????? They were all about that before and now they aren't?

    Now they're pissy at the ISPs?

    Can you say "Hyp-o-cras-y"?
    borhan9 (AfterDawn Addict) 19 February 2008 2:28 Send private message to this user   
    At one stage they were for drm and now they are not make up your minds people :P
    phobet (Newbie) 12 May 2008 17:49 Send private message to this user   
    Once again, big record labels want someone to subsidize their business model. Instead of offering compelling content in the forms the consumer is looking for, at a reasonable price, they want the ISPs to police their networks, thereby assisting them in keeping alive their mediocrity. Only when the companies are in sync with their consumer base, can they succeed in their endeavors.
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2009 by AfterDawn Ltd.