User User name Password  
   
Wednesday 15.10.2008 / 10:42 PM
Search:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > riaa goes judge shopping in new york
Show topics
News
News

RIAA goes judge shopping in New York

14 June 2008 3:11 by Rich "vurbal" Fiscus | 7 comments

RIAA goes judge shopping in New York Ray Beckerman, the attorney behind the RIAA watchdog site Recording Industry vs The People appeared to be on the verge of getting a file sharing lawsuit dismissed in federal court when the RIAA suddenly dopped the case. Initially there was a lot of speculation they feared the judge's expected decision that simply making music available by sharing via P2P doesn't infringe copyright and neither does an authorized recording industry agent downloading it. Now it looks like there was more to it than that as the suit has been re-filed with the apparent aim of getting a more favorable judge.

You see the issue isn't whether the RIAA can re-file in federal court. Since the original lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice they're within their rights to do so. What's controversial is their failure to let the courts know this was a case that had already been assigned a judge in a previous incarnation. This "oversight" allowed them to get a new judge.

In response Beckerman has told one interviewer "These people are psychos."

Regardless of their state of mental health this doesn't appear to be one of the RIAA's smarter moves. It shouldn't come as any surprise to them that Beckerman would let both judges know what's happening, which of course he has. Even assuming they got a judge who would be likely to agree with them this time, they may face an uphill battle explaining why the case should even be heard by a second judge.

Maybe somebody should explain to their lawyers that federal judges tend to be harder to intimidate than single mothers, children, or dead people. And their track record isn't so hot against any of them either.

Permalink to this article | Topics:

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • German court clears WiFi theft victims of responsibility for copyright infringment of others (10 July 2008)
  • Judge once again affirms award against RIAA in Tanya Andersen case (26 June 2008)
  • Apple, Dell named in portable touch screen technology suit (24 June 2008)
  • EFF shoots down "making available" argument in Jammie Thomas case (23 June 2008)
  • MPAA to judge: We don't need no stinking proof (21 June 2008)
  • RIAA prepares to drop long running P2P suit for a lack of evidence (20 June 2008)
  • New study: young people prefer to reward artists and peers for music (17 June 2008)
  • Lancashire police accused of playing music without a license (15 June 2008)
  • RIAA allegedly seeking piracy tax on internet access (14 June 2008)
  • Record labels sue P2P pioneer for $20 million USD (8 June 2008)
  • Virgin and BPI send letters to suspected pirates (6 June 2008)
  • MPAA accuses laser printer of illegal file sharing (5 June 2008)
  • Former OiNK user gets arrested (31 May 2008)
  • RIAA claims victory over AllofMP3 (27 May 2008)
  • Controversial intellectual property treaty being drafted in secret (27 May 2008)
  • Jammie Thomas begins music sharing case appeal (17 May 2008)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    Warner Bros. adds content to online distributors
    Next news article »
    Panasonic says Tru2Way should be available by holiday season
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    Blackjax (Member) 14 June 2008 3:28 Send private message to this user   
    Well eventually their track record is going to end up like Big Brown in the derby..... coming in dead last. Keep screwing around with the bull and eventually you will get the horn. Eventually they will hurt themselves by stepping on enough consumer toes.

    As for the comment of "these people are pyschos" well that was spot on right and well known amongst those of us who try to stay informed.

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 14 June 2008 3:30

    nobrainer (Inactive) 14 June 2008 3:48 Send private message to this user   
    you also forgot accusing photocopiers for copy-write infringement!

    this is just as low as you'd expect from this lot and lets all hope the judge residing thinks the same.

    just because the case isn't going our way, we are going to stamp our feet and scream and shout and keep going until we find a judge we've paid off.


    The BPI Are: SONY, UNIVERSAL, WARNER GROUP, EMI.
    The RIAA Soundexchange Are: SONY, UNIVERSAL, WARNER GROUP, EMI.
    The IFPI Are: The same anti consumer lot as listed above!
    The MPAA Are: SONY, UNIVERSAL, WARNER GROUP, DISNEY, PARAMOUNT, FOX.

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 14 June 2008 3:52

    7thsinger (AfterDawn Addict) 14 June 2008 11:17 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    Maybe somebody should explain to their lawyers that federal judges tend to be harder to intimidate than single mothers, children, or dead people. And their track record isn't so hot against any of them either.

    So true and well said.

    EDIT: and don't forget laser printers.

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 14 June 2008 11:18

    ddp (Moderator) 14 June 2008 12:19 Send private message to this user   
    my laser printer is innocent as i found it aslong the side of the road unless it got left behind by illegal downloaders then oh well. you know the saying, " free is free".
    vurbal (Staff Member) 14 June 2008 12:59 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Maybe somebody should explain to their lawyers that federal judges tend to be harder to intimidate than single mothers, children, or dead people. And their track record isn't so hot against any of them either.

    So true and well said.

    EDIT: and don't forget laser printers.

    I don't know about that. They scared the toner right out of mine. I had to vacuum up a pile of it from in front of the printer stand last week ;-)
    Blackjax (Member) 15 June 2008 1:24 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Maybe somebody should explain to their lawyers that federal judges tend to be harder to intimidate than single mothers, children, or dead people. And their track record isn't so hot against any of them either.

    So true and well said.

    EDIT: and don't forget laser printers.

    I don't know about that. They scared the toner right out of mine. I had to vacuum up a pile of it from in front of the printer stand last week ;-)
    And I thought mine was the only one that wasn't house broken!
    southrb (Newbie) 19 June 2008 14:15 Send private message to this user   
    Is that not haw justice is bought--sorry dispensed
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums | DVD X Copy Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi | fin.MP3Lizard.com
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2008 by AfterDawn Ltd.