User User name Password  
   
Tuesday 24.11.2009 / 01:39 AM
Search AfterDawn.com:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > itunes price change is hurting tracks
Show topics
News
News

iTunes price change is hurting tracks

11 April 2009 21:44 by Andre "DVDBack23" Yoskowitz | 10 comments

iTunes price change is hurting tracks Last Tuesday, Apple's iTunes went DRM-free, but at the same time began charging more for new hit singles, $1.29 USD, up from the standard $0.99.

Two days ago, Amazon and Wal-Mart followed the move by upping the price of new tracks by 30 cents as well, to $1.29 on Amazon, and $1.24 at Wal-Mart. Apple now sells older tracks for 69 cents, 99 cents for most new tracks, and $1.29 for the biggest new hits.

It appears, in what can only be described as a "shocking" development, that the rise in prices is hurting sales of the more expensive tracks, and could eventually lead to less revenue as well. These conclusions, from Billboard are only based on two days of data however, and are obviously subject to change. So far, the higher priced songs continue to lose chart positions to lower price songs.

On average, $1.29 songs lost 5.3 places on the Top 100 sales chart, while $0.99 songs gained 2.5 spots. A few of the songs that were initially $.99 on Tuesday but changed to $1.29 on Wednesday lost an average 1.9 places, while those that remained $1.29 for both days lost a huge 7.7 average positions.

The same trend was seen on Thursday with the more expensive tracks losing even more spots, an average of 12.4.

You can view the report here: Billboard


Permalink to this article | Topics:

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • Label profit falls with new iTunes prices (7 May 2009)
  • iTunes in Germany adds feature films (17 April 2009)
  • iTunes tiered pricing not a big hit in the first week (16 April 2009)
  • iPhone and iPod make ripples in games industry (13 April 2009)
  • Apple gives prizes as tally nears 1 billion Apps served (10 April 2009)
  • Amazon, Wal-Mart, raise MP3 download prices (9 April 2009)
  • Unsubsidized iPhone 3G now available (27 March 2009)
  • Review: mp3HD lossless codec (27 March 2009)
  • RIM to offer unlimited TV downloads? (27 March 2009)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    Yahoo and Microsoft back in talks over ad deal
    Next news article »
    Microsoft fined over alleged price fixing of Office
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    khmernize (Newbie) 11 April 2009 22:04 Send private message to this user   
    I wonder how long before Apple will reduce their price back to the orginal price and keep everything DRM free.
    ThePastor (Junior Member) 11 April 2009 23:14 Send private message to this user   
    So, this will basically render the Top 100 lists useless... (it's about time!)
    xnonsuchx (Member) 12 April 2009 2:13 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by khmernize:
    I wonder how long before Apple will reduce their price back to the orginal price and keep everything DRM free.
    It's not Apple...it's the record companies. Apple wanted to keep everything 99 cents, but the record companies would only agree to the DRM-free, higher quality encoding if they would charge more for new singles. What I wonder now is that since 'deep tracks' are now 69 cents, if people will be upset if those go back to 99 cents if they go back to how it was.
    ThePastor (Junior Member) 12 April 2009 4:02 Send private message to this user   
    But the whole Top 40 and Top 100 has always been based on equal availability. With two or three tier pricing you could make an instant hit simply by putting it in the .99 section and giving it an instant boost! In other words, they can manipulate the Top 40, (as if they never did that before)
    A side-effect will be that the studios will find that their new hits that they expect to "Go number one with a bullet" won't make it quite as high up the list as they expected, because it will be in the higher priced section!
    The whole paradigm will fall apart.
    elbald90 (Newbie) 12 April 2009 4:34 Send private message to this user   
    what did they expect would happen if only businesses in all walks of life would wake up and realise that the better value for money something is the more you will make sky high prices dont always mean high profit . if people see a good price for something they will buy it and you will make more in the long run
    pphoenix (Inactive) 12 April 2009 5:17 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by khmernize:
    I wonder how long before Apple will reduce their price back to the orginal price and keep everything DRM free.
    but it's not the RIP OFF price the RIAA demands, that is hurting the business, It's PIRACY.

    RIAA:

    * EMI
    * Sony
    * Universal
    * Warner


    and the governments say, now lets get on with DPI, now we have installed enough FEAR into everyone.
    DXR88 (Senior Member) 12 April 2009 19:55 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    but it's not the RIP OFF price the RIAA demands, that is hurting the business, It's PIRACY.

    RIAA:

    * EMI
    * Sony
    * Universal
    * Warner


    and the governments say, now lets get on with DPI, now we have installed enough FEAR into everyone.
    Fear you really think they scare people. there the ones that should be afraid.
    bomber991 (Junior Member) 12 April 2009 23:42 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by elbald90:
    what did they expect would happen if only businesses in all walks of life would wake up and realise that the better value for money something is the more you will make sky high prices dont always mean high profit . if people see a good price for something they will buy it and you will make more in the long run
    We know these record companies are really big businesses. I'm pretty sure they have a few people working there that did a good 4 years of college just studying economics. What you just said though is basically true.
    SProdigy (Member) 13 April 2009 11:00 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by elbald90:
    what did they expect would happen if only businesses in all walks of life would wake up and realise that the better value for money something is the more you will make sky high prices dont always mean high profit . if people see a good price for something they will buy it and you will make more in the long run
    Agreed. I picked up a few tracks off of Bush's Sixteen Stone album for 99 cents a piece... it was released in 1994! Even movies that have been out for awhile go on sale, but music in general: not so much!

    The full CD on Amazon, or at Best Buy is still 13.99. I need to start going to the library for more of my music before the RIAA realizes that CD's are rented there for FREE. (And DVD's... and of course BOOKS.)
    nepgunes (Junior Member) 13 April 2009 15:24 Send private message to this user   
    All tracks are still $1 over at Thumbplay and have always been DRM-Free.
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2009 by AfterDawn Ltd.