Mobile/PDA About Us Advertise here


		User name	Password

		Not registered yet? Register here. Lost your password? Click here.

Browse by topic

News

Judge throws out ASCAP's ringtone money grab

15 October 2009 19:30 by Rich "vurbal" Fiscus | 7 comments

On Wednesday a Federal judge granted Verizon's request for summary judgement, shooting down all of ASCAP's claims that mobile phone providers should pay public performance royalties for ringtones they sell.

The sale of ringtones already requires the seller to pay mechanical royalties to the publisher (songwriter) and recording artist, just like MP3s or CDs.

ASCAP claimed that when the ringtone is downloaded by a customer or plays when a mobile phone rings it's a public performance. Because of that they were asking for additional royalties.

The short version of Judge Denise Cote's ruling is that there is no public performance under US copyright law so there can be no infringement of that right.

The first claim Judge Cote addressed was the transmission of a digital file from mobile provider to the customer's phone. She pointed out "ASCAP does not contend... that a Verizon customer can actually listen to a ringtone while she is downloading it; it acknowledges that the ringtone cannot be played before the transmission is concluded"

In other words a data download isn't a performance. She also concluded that because the transmission is sent to a single individual it's not public by definition.

Expect these points to be revisited in the pending case by ASCAP and BMI over downloads from online music stores like iTunes.

But what about when the phone rings? That was an even easier question to answer.

She wrote "customers do not play ringtones with any expectation of profit. The playing of a ringtone by any Verizon customers in public is thus exempt under 17 U.S.C. � 110(4) and does not require them to obtain a public performance license."

Once again, no public performance as defined by copyright law so there are no royalties to collect.

Finally she ruled on what may be ASCAP's most ridiculous assertion, that Verizon controls when a downloaded ringtone plays.

"Once the customer has downloaded the ringtone onto her telephone," Judge Cote wrote,"she controls the telephone and makes the decisions that determine whether that ringtone will be triggered by an incoming call signal. And, of course, it is someone else entirely -- the caller -- who has initiated this entire process."

What's really significant in this case isn't just that Verizon, and by extension their customers, prevailed. As Judge Cote herself pointed out, before granting Verizon's motion for summary judgement she was required to look at the facts in the most favorable way for ASCAP.

Her ruling in Verizon's favor means she didn't find the slightest possibility ASCAP had a legitimate case.

Permalink to this article | Topics: Lawsuits & Legislation MP3 & Digital Audio Online music services Phones

Senate Judiciary Committee approves radio royalty bill (20 October 2009)

Verizon starts "Quadruple-play" bundles (19 October 2009)

Traditional videogame business model is sinking ship, says EA Sports boss (19 October 2009)

Radio stations could face fight over songwriter payments (13 October 2009)

ASCAP squeezes license fees for ringtone use from Verizon (25 September 2009)

Songwriter groups want downloads classified as public performance (19 September 2009)

UK songwriter royalties fall without YouTube contribution (27 July 2009)

House committee votes 21-9 in favor of new radio royalties (14 May 2009)

« Previous news article
Acer surpasses Dell in global PC shipments

Next news article »
Sony Ericsson continues streak of poor earnings

Post your comment

Discuss this article!
Hopium (Newbie) 15 October 2009 21:57
they should counter-sue for wasting everyones time [ + quote]
djgizmo (Junior Member) 16 October 2009 1:55
Its about time someone has some common sense. [ + quote]
Unfocused (Member) 16 October 2009 14:09
Well played! Greed is a mother.... [ + quote]
lubricant (Junior Member) 16 October 2009 14:30
ridiculous. [ + quote]
KillerBug (Senior Member) 17 October 2009 4:53
I guess they will appeal to a higher, better bribed court. It is only a matter of time before the law states that simply having an MP3 is a public performance, even if it is never played. [ + quote]
Unfocused (Member) 17 October 2009 18:18
So if the carrier is forced to pay a fine for making a "Public Performance," can I get paid as being the "Producer" or "Performance Organizer?" If ASCAP wants to go out on a limb with these ridiculous claims, why can't I? [ + quote] This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 17 October 2009 18:18
linhanyi (Inactive) 6 November 2009 2:28
SPAM removed [ + quote] This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6 November 2009 6:34