User User name Password  
   
Wednesday 20.8.2008 / 05:54 AM
Search:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > sbc challenges riaa's subpoenas
Show topics
News
News

SBC challenges RIAA's subpoenas

16 September 2003 13:08 by Petteri "dRD" Pyyny | 10 comments

SBC challenges RIAA's subpoenas SBC Communications, the 2nd largest "Baby Bell" (regional phone operator, Verizon being the biggest "Baby Bell") in the U.S., has refused to hand out its subscribers' personal details to the RIAA.

Despite Verizon losing its similiar case in June, SBC has announced that it will fight every single one of the subpoenas in court if necessary or until the court decides that they have to hand out the details for every subpoena request they receive.

SBC has sued the RIAA over the subpoena demands in California. SBC is the biggest broadband provider in the U.S. with over three million broadband subscribers. It is also the only ISP since Verizon lost its case in June that has refused to co-operate with RIAA. RIAA has quickly responded to SBC's statements pointing out to a recent SBC's print advertisement that said, in part: "Download all the music you like. And all the music you sort of, kind of, maybe even a little bit like. Go MP3 crazy. Try new music. Build a song library. Whatever." and claimed the SBC's only motivation to protect its customers against RIAA is pure greed. According to SBC, last time the ad was run was in January 2002 and it is totally "irrelevant to the current issue of consumer privacy and protection".

Source: New York Times (requires free registration)

Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • RIAA sues yet another 41 P2P users (3 December 2003)
  • SBC challenges RIAA over DMCA-subpoenas (22 November 2003)
  • New lawsuits filed by RIAA (30 October 2003)
  • P2P subpoenas under scrutiny (16 September 2003)
  • Over 250 file swappers sued by RIAA (8 September 2003)
  • RIAA vs subpoena fighter "Jane Doe" continues (29 August 2003)
  • Californian woman challenges RIAA's subpoena (21 August 2003)
  • Schools challenge the RIAA subpoenas (23 July 2003)
  • RIAA wins over 800 subpoenas against P2P users (21 July 2003)
  • Music industry to file lawsuits against individual P2P users (26 June 2003)
  • Verizon forced to hand out subscriber details to RIAA (5 June 2003)
  • PeerGuardian: Protect your privacy on P2P networks (15 May 2003)
  • Verizon lost its appeal against RIAA (25 April 2003)
  • Verizon to appeal court ruling (31 January 2003)
  • Judge: Verizon has to tell the P2P user's name to RIAA (21 January 2003)
  • RIAA wants ISPs to pay for their users' P2P use (18 January 2003)
  • Yahoo and ISPs support Verizon against RIAA (11 September 2002)
  • Consumer groups snap RIAA (1 September 2002)
  • RIAA puts legal pressure on Verizon (21 August 2002)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    SlySoft to develope CloneCD further
    Next news article »
    P2P subpoenas under scrutiny
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    Dela (Staff Member) 16 September 2003 15:04 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    and claimed the SBC's only motivation to protect its customers against RIAA is pure greed
    SAYS THE RIAA?????????????????????????????

    http://www.BillLonero.com - Check out a true artists music!

    aD channel on IRC: rod.liquidirc.com #ad_buddies
    Newbie IRC Guide- http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/47221
    Mantle7 (Inactive) 16 September 2003 21:35 Send private message to this user   
    NOw thats funny. The RIAA talking about GREED!! Im sure that 12 year old girl had loads of money just lieing around just waiting to give those greedy bastards Unreal..just unreal!!
    Ghostdog (Senior Member) 17 September 2003 4:35 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    SAYS THE RIAA?????????????????????????????
    Funny, I was thinking the exact same thing.
    mystic (Member) 17 September 2003 7:01 Send private message to this user   
    well with the latest revelation of where the prevoisly unreleased media was traced to insiders to the music and film industry makes you think .... who would in their right mind even listin to the RIAA... most judges will now have to rule in favor of the p2ps clearly the music and movie industry conspired to set up everyone to down load matreal that wouldn't have been there if not for them....
    PDR60 (Inactive) 17 September 2003 12:07 Send private message to this user   
    It is typical film/music mentality. "Anything to get our way". They want to be in control of what we can share/download. That's the only way they can make money off of each and every download. They(RIAA) wil be able to set prices and regulate what and when we will be able to download/share. Now if thats not pure motivation by greed I'm not sure what is..... This whole thing is getting stupid. I hope a Judge can see through their game and bring some common sense to the table. but then again its the court system........
    GrayArea (Member) 17 September 2003 14:17 Send private message to this user   
    Are ISP customers dropping their service if their provider has turned "infringer's" info over to the RIAA??? Not a bad idea but I don't think so. So how does protecting it's customer's privacy make SBC greedy? I really wanna know!

    We mustn't lower ourselves to the level of those we loathe, lest we become loathsome ourselves.
    Finman (Inactive) 17 September 2003 15:34 Send private message to this user   
    Finally some services are getting some balls and standing up for their subscribers. Greed or not, I would rather have a service that has its customers in mind over and above the ridiculous intentions of the RIAA. I only hope that other ISP's get the same idea and make this as difficult a process as they are able to for the RIAA.
    Actuator (Inactive) 17 September 2003 19:22 Send private message to this user   
    I would ONLY use an ISP that keeps its customers info far away from the RIAA! And I hope this method of subpoena is ruled unconstitutional (sooner the better) I cant believe the congress has been helping the RIAA by giving them this powerful subpoena method (which they abuse)! It should also be unconstitutional to take thousands of people to court under one subpoena also and illegal to combine all the cases into one trial or case (perposterous if they think they could ever get away with that, it would be a downright blight to humanity)
    Litnrod (Inactive) 18 September 2003 6:19 Send private message to this user   
    I see it has been quoted already but
    "..and claimed the SBC's only motivation to protect its customers against RIAA is pure greed" ..

    isn't that like the pot calling the kettle black ?!?!?!?!

    that statement alone has made my entire day for comic relief .. and i've just got up .. haha
    oprater (Inactive) 22 September 2003 18:49 Send private message to this user   
    I too am glad that an ISP is standing up for it's customers. I use SBC and love the great DSL service. Now I have another reason to love them.
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums | DVD X Copy Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi | fin.MP3Lizard.com
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2008 by AfterDawn Ltd.