|
10 October 2003 16:39 by Petteri "dRD" Pyyny
| 3 comments
Despite various rumors in public during this week that MPAA's chief executive Jack Valenti had met various indie movie authors in order to negotiate about the screener ban for Oscars, it seems that the ban stands.
Indie movie producers, directors, etc that operate in major movie studios' "indie divisions" have expressed their concerns over the decision. MPAA and major movie studios decided on last week to ban so-called Oscar screeners. Screeners are DVDs and videotapes of movies that haven't been released officially on that medium yet, but are being sent in advance to specific viewer groups, such as critics -- and in this particular case, those who are eligible to vote for Academy Awards.
Studios fear that perfect-quality DVD copies of their recently released movies get leaked to Net from people who receive screener copies during the "Oscar season" and therefor decided that they wont be sending any screener copies this year. This obviously doesn't have any meaning whatsoever to studios that aren't affiliated with major movie studios, but causes problems for indie divisions of major movie studios -- chances of voters even seeing niche movies before they need to cast their votes, are rather slim if indie movie producers can't send those movies directly to voters.
Anyway, after Mr. Valenti agreed to negotiate with heads of indie divisions, MPAA released a statement that the announced DVD screener ban stands.
"Jack Valenti has had conversations with individuals and several groups on the subject of the new screener policy," said MPAA public affairs VP Rich Taylor in a statement. "He welcomes the exchange of thoughts and ideas on the critical issue of combating piracy. That said, the screener policy remains as it was originally announced."
More information:
IndieWire (1)
IndieWire (2)
NYTimes (requires registration)
Permalink to this article
| |
Related articles:
Actor fined over Oscar screener piracy (24 November 2004)
BAFTA voters to get secure DVD players (31 August 2004)
Indie group wins screener ban battle (6 December 2003)
DVD screener ruling on Friday (4 December 2003)
MPAA sued over DVD screener ban (25 November 2003)
MPAA and Academy make a deal over Oscar screeners (23 October 2003)
LA Critics call off their awards in protest (20 October 2003)
Writers Guild opposes screener ban (14 October 2003)
MPAA bans Oscar screeners (1 October 2003)
MPAA tracks illegal movie copies (10 September 2003)
MPAA anti-piracy campaign in movie theaters (22 July 2003)
|
|
|
| Discuss this article! |
| Dela (Staff Member) 10 October 2003 19:35 |
|
Well, I think we all know what this is really about. Sure if they get leaked it'll be bad etc etc but what Jack Valenti is really trying to do is discredit internet users with this ban. Look, if oscar screeners dont hit the net, CAMs, Telesync's maybe even Telecines WILL so there is no other explanation for this. Maybe these indie movie producers were ignoring the whole internet piracy issue because a lot of internet users might have been ignoring their movies anyway but Jack has come up with a great plan to make it all look like the internet users fault! The forthcoming oscars should be very interesting!
|
| #afonic (Member) 11 October 2003 4:53 |
|
And how will the critics see the movies? I believe you should view 2-3 times a movie to be sure to vote about something so important like the Oscars!
Except this, I believe Dela is right. Movies will find their way to the net, there are always other ways for that.
|
| loaded (Moderator) 11 October 2003 14:17 |
|
I think it is less likely that some rich brat son of a director, or critic would leak the movie. Far more likely to be technicians (sorry guys!) within Technicolor and the like, as well as disties, all of whom have wider, more common access to these films anyway, as well as the knowhow to copy, rip, upload etc.
And what about post production? I bet they think slapping the words 'For Academy Consideration Only' - Which is, I believe, the quote, although I have never seen it for myself - might get some toffs in trouble ;-)
Anyway, the movies WILL get out even with this removal of priviliges, which is likely to really annoy some people, who will see it as an accusation of guilt.
Paul.
I'm back...
...can't you smell the fear?
|
|
|
Latest newsLatest news from AfterDawn.com. Verizon doubles early termination fee for smartphones 8 Nov, 2009 What does Google know about you? Try 'Dashboard' 8 Nov, 2009 Blu-ray 'Managed Copy' to start in December, lacking hardware support 8 Nov, 2009 | 5 comments Myka introduces ION media center set-top 8 Nov, 2009 American texters send 4.1 billion per day 8 Nov, 2009 | 4 comments Skype is finally free to be independent 8 Nov, 2009 Technology leads to enhanced social worlds, says study 8 Nov, 2009 | 1 comment iPhone app developer sued for 'stealing' user's numbers 7 Nov, 2009 | 4 comments Amazon, Disney, Pixar start deep Blu-ray promotion 7 Nov, 2009 | 10 comments BlackBerry passes iPhone in market share again 7 Nov, 2009 | 1 comment Digital stores will not sell Modern Warfare 2 due to Steamworks 7 Nov, 2009 | 9 comments Boxee beta coming December 7th 7 Nov, 2009
More news... 
Search for headlinesSearch through our news archive. 
Latest threadsRecently updated discussion threads. More... 
Last week's most popular software downloads
Most popular devicesLast week's most popular products in our product comparison service. More products... 
Top linksMost popular links - Blasteroids.com
Download game trailers, demos and more - TorrentReactor.Net
The most active torrents on the web - Digital-Digest
Latest DivX, XviD, DVD, Blu-Ray, HD DVD News - OpenSubtitles.org
download DivX subtitles from the biggest open database - CDRInfo.com
The Hardware Authority - DVDHelp.us
DVD help, tutorials, FAQ, and very popular free help forum! - Torrentreactor.TO
The most active torrents on the web - dvd ripper
rip DVD to VCD, DivX, MPEG, SVCD, AVI easily and quickly.

|