User User name Password  
   
Sunday 8.11.2009 / 07:31 AM
Search AfterDawn.com:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > mpaa and academy make a deal over oscar screeners
Show topics
News
News

MPAA and Academy make a deal over Oscar screeners

23 October 2003 15:41 by Petteri "dRD" Pyyny | 6 comments

MPAA and Academy make a deal over Oscar screeners MPAA and Academy of Motion Picture Art have managed to reach a compromise over the MPAA's decision to ban Oscar screeners that has infuriated tons of industry insiders.

According to the deal, MPAA member studios wont send out any DVD screeners (screener is a DVD or VHS pre-release of a movie on DVD or VHS that hasn't been released for rental distribution yet), but will send out watermarked VHS screeners instead. These screeners will be sent out only to Academy members, i.e. for all of those eligible to vote for Oscars, but leaves out other award institutions, such as Golden Globes.

Each Academy member will have to sign a contract where he/she agrees that the screener wont be taken out of their homes and that the tape would be watermarked in a way that copies made from it could be tracked back to the individual who "leaked" the copy. If anyone gets caught of "leaking" a screener copy, they would get expelled from the Academy.

In addition to MPAA member companies, New Line Cinema and DreamWorks Pictures have agreed to arrangement. According to both, Academy and MPAA, this will be a one-year experiment to see what kind of effects it has on overall movie piracy.

Source: Hollywood Reporter

Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • Actor fined over Oscar screener piracy (24 November 2004)
  • BAFTA voters to get secure DVD players (31 August 2004)
  • FBI investigates Oscar screener leak (19 January 2004)
  • Indie group wins screener ban battle (6 December 2003)
  • DVD screener ruling on Friday (4 December 2003)
  • MPAA sued over DVD screener ban (25 November 2003)
  • MPAA: No screeners for other than Academy members (17 November 2003)
  • LA Critics call off their awards in protest (20 October 2003)
  • Writers Guild opposes screener ban (14 October 2003)
  • MPAA's decision to ban Oscar screeners stands (10 October 2003)
  • MPAA bans Oscar screeners (1 October 2003)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    Traditional radio stations have to pay royalties for Net streaming
    Next news article »
    VSO releases BlindWrite 5 for public
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    Nephilim (Moderator) 23 October 2003 20:15 Send private message to this user   
    How about NO EFFECT WHATSOEVER. This is just beyond stupid.

    I never killed anybody that didn't deserve it.
    Ghostdog (Senior Member) 24 October 2003 8:14 Send private message to this user   
    At least they made a rational deal.
    GrayArea (Member) 24 October 2003 11:00 Send private message to this user   
    The MPAA is threatening Academy members with expulsion (and lawsuits no doubt) if they "leak" copies of screeners. They have to sign a contract to that effect. I suppose one could consider that rational, but I feel it sends a very hostile message to the Academy. Kind of like the RIAA to it's customers. "You are our sworn enemy and will be treated as such". That's f**ked up.

    We mustn't lower ourselves to the level of those we loathe, lest we become loathsome ourselves.
    Toiletman (Senior Member) 24 October 2003 14:53 Send private message to this user   
    This is a really good way to fight piracy, but for some people here, it's "too effective" ;)

    When you are on your deathbed, you will wonder, "Did I waste my life? Was it worth spending all that time on that?" Do not despair, no one has wasted their life. After all, you can only waste something if you throw it away. And you can't throw life away.
    Ghostdog (Senior Member) 25 October 2003 9:37 Send private message to this user   
    Yeah I guess I didn´t formulate my reply very well. What I meant was that the deal is good considering what could have been.
    vudoo (Member) 28 October 2003 15:04 Send private message to this user   
    Doesn't matter. The watermarks can be taken out by a tech savy individual so this is just another scare tactic. If the MPAA starts taking away rights of the corporate people they will find themself washed out.

    Voodoohippie
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2009 by AfterDawn Ltd.