Feedback
 
AfterDawn: Tech news

Site update - March 16th 2010

AfterDawn.com has been updated! In addition to renewing the layout of the site we have also speeded up things considerably. The new version has been tested on our Finnish site for several months, and during the testing we have managed to improve the new version even further.

You can now enjoy this new layout at English AfterDawn.com and English Discussion Forums as well! We have also introduced new sections to the site, and re-arranged things a bit.

Read more about the update and let us know what you think!

Close this message

Joost named as defendant in StreamCast lawsuit

Written by James "Dela" Delahunty @ 22 May 2007 19:42 User comments (5)

Joost named as defendant in StreamCast lawsuit Joost has been named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed a year ago over the technology upon which Skype and Joost are based. Last year, StreamCast Networks accused Niklas Zennstrom and Janus Friis, the pair that developed the technology behind the companies Kazaa and Skype, of breaking an agreement to give StreamCast the first right to purchase their FastTrack P2P protocol.

FastTrack was formerly the network which Morpheus' file-sharing application operated on and is also the technology foundation of Skype's voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service. StreamCast claims that the entrepreneurs breached contract by improperly transferring technology rights away from StreamCast.

Source:
News.com

  SoundExchange offers smaller webcasters lower royalty rates Electric Slide creator calls off online takedown campaign  

Share this


Write a comment

5 user comments

123.5.2007 7:15

"StreamCast claims that the entrepreneurs breached contract by improperly transferring technology rights away from StreamCast. "

So they are suing because some of the are making money?

223.5.2007 22:53

Was not this software open source.

324.5.2007 0:52

Originally posted by borhan9:
Was not this software open source.

the hint of money trumps logic.

424.5.2007 10:52

Originally posted by borhan9:
Was not this software open source.
Whether the software IS or ISN'T open source has little to do with it being copyrighted, commercial/paid, or with its licensing.

524.5.2007 10:56

Quote:
Originally posted by borhan9:
Was not this software open source.
Whether the software IS or ISN'T open source has little to do with it being copyrighted, commercial/paid, or with its licensing.
a hint of zippy trumps logic too....

Open source dose not mean one can repackage and resale it without paying for it.

Comment this article

If you do not have an AfterDawn.com account yet, please enter your nickname and email address below. An activation link will be emailed to you.

If you already have an AfterDawn.com account, please login using the next tab.


Login by using your Afterdawn.com -username or your email address.

Bold Italic Red color Quote Code Add image Add url




Subscribe

Latest news via RSS
Add to your Google homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to MyMSN
Add to Netvibes

News archive