AfterDawn: Tech news

Debate over 3D TV safety

Written by James Delahunty (Google+) @ 01 Feb 2011 20:08 User comments (7)

Debate over 3D TV safety A debate has been brewing over the safety of images produced by 3D televisions amidst suggestions to keep younger viewers away from them.
The Nintendo 3DS handheld is due to be released in Japan on February 26, offering 3D images to gamers without the need for any glasses to create the effect. Nintendo of America President and COO Reggie Fils-Aime had recommended that very young children not be exposed to the 3D images, and said that it was a standard protocol within the industry.

Following that suggestion and similar advice, a debate has grown in the media about the potential "dangers" of 3D images. Often brought up are comments from Mark Pesce, an early pioneer in virtual reality, made last year where he said children could potentially suffer permanent damage from regular and extensive exposure to 3D images on a screen.

He also criticized the major tech companies pushing the technology for not doing healthy safety tests. Sony, Samsung and LG are among tech giants that do actually issue health and safety guidance with 3D products, mostly echoing the advice made by Nintendo but also extending to people under the influence of alcohol, pregnant women, senior citizens and people with heart health issues.

DreamWorks Animation chief executive Jeffery Katzenberg dismisses most of the safety concerns surrounding the technology. "It does not seem to be based on any meaningful research or medical advice," he said.

"We are in the kid business and we have talked to many people, experts in the fields of eye and eye care and so we've asked 'is there something we need to be concerned about?', and it's a hypothetical. What people have said is that for very, very early eye development - which we were told is three years and younger by the way, not six years - there is some concern that there might be some issue of... straining the eyes."

DreamWorks Animation now produces all of its films in 3D.

Previous Next  

7 user comments

12.2.2011 1:50
lissenup2
Inactive

3D is a scam fad that will die out in the next few years. But as most of us could have anticipated..............they have FORCED it on us by including with most televisions. Poll the world and I'd bet most will opt for a less expensive TV without 3D.

22.2.2011 3:29

I don't get the thing with 3D. I saw Toy Story 3 in 3D and I did not see that being in 3D added anything to the experience much.


:/

32.2.2011 8:29

its good to see 1 or 2 3d films...then the novelty wears out.......then it starts giving me headaches watching it......

42.2.2011 13:10

I'd be glad for them to pay me to drink and watch movies anytime though...


Just my $0.02,

dEwMe

52.2.2011 14:58

Hm.... hope videos in 3d as well

63.2.2011 6:10

I think 4DTV would be a better standard. Just imagine, you could watch TV from the back and see yourslf looking in at yourself while looking out at yourself. That would screw people up and need a health warning.

73.2.2011 9:26

Originally posted by JGJD2001:
its good to see 1 or 2 3d films...then the novelty wears out.......then it starts giving me headaches watching it......
Sums up the experience for me.

Its a lot easier being righteous than right.


DSE VZ300-
Zilog Z80 CPU, 32KB RAM (16K+16K cartridge), video processor 6847, 2KB video RAM, 16 colours (text mode), 5.25" FDD

Comments have been disabled for this article.

News archive