AfterDawn: Tech news

IMAGiNE group members all plead guilty

Written by Andre Yoskowitz @ 04 Sep 2012 12:33 User comments (5)

IMAGiNE group members all plead guilty The fourth member of the once popular IMAGiNE piracy release group has plead guilty to copyright infringement and now faces jail time.
Jeramiah Perkins of Portsmouth faces up to 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, just like his co-conspirators.

Last September, the P2P top group stopped distributing new CAM and TS releases, and the P2P world began speculating that maybe they had been caught. This proved true as rumor has it a rival P2P group sold them out to the MPAA which then turned to the authorities.

The group had released hundreds of films, many of which were recorded in movie theaters by members of the group.

As of today, Jeramiah Perkins, 39, of Portsmouth, Va., Gregory Cherwonik, 53, of New York, Willie Lambert, 57, of Pennsylvania, and Sean Lovelady, 27, of California have all plead guilty to at least a count of conspiracy to commit criminal copyright infringement.



All the defendants are out on bail until sentencing in early 2013.

Previous Next  

5 user comments

14.9.2012 01:42
aeonstom0
Inactive

That they were sold out by another P2P Group now that is low. I wonder Why?

24.9.2012 10:53

All over a case of 'Tiny Dick Syndrome'... Not that I have a lot of empathy for people copying movies literally off of the movie screen itself. That to me is just scraping the bottom of the barrel.

DVD/Blurays, those have enough gray area worth debating.

34.9.2012 16:12

Originally posted by LordRuss:
All over a case of 'Tiny Dick Syndrome'... Not that I have a lot of empathy for people copying movies literally off of the movie screen itself. That to me is just scraping the bottom of the barrel.

DVD/Blurays, those have enough gray area worth debating.
To me this is one of the few forms of piracy that I look kindly upon. Making a 1:1 copy of a bluray frequently results in the loss of a sale...yeah, some people still buy it later, and you can argue that the crummy studios don't deserve money or that the movie isn't worth $20...but I at least feel bad for some studios some of the time for some movies.

However, CAM rips are so terribly low quality that the only way it will prevent a disk sale later is if the movie is really terrible and only worth watching once (or not at all). I'm not confessing to anything here, but I may or may not have used these in the past so that I could stay home with the GF smoking weed and f**king instead of going out. If hollywood had just let me buy/rent the movie at release I would have...but they only do that for the rich. It may cause lost ticket sales at the theaters as well, but I can't be bothered by that...the theaters suck, the food prices and quality suck, the employees are rude, there are crying babies in the R-rated movies, there is no smoking, there is no drinking (except for the places that sell watered-down swill for $5 a cup), and they never have any of the good indie films...I wouldn't mind at all if they killed off all the theaters if not for the fact that I have some fond memories of the drive-in (that have nothing at all to do with the movie; they could have been playing a loop of barbie commercials for all I care).

Long live CAM rips...or at least live them as long as they delay home releases.

45.9.2012 11:18

Originally posted by KillerBug:
Long live CAM rips...or at least live them as long as they delay home releases.
Well... You make a valid point. Why should should the rich mucky mucks get to see screeners if we can't? Obviously they don't have to pay for them. And I BARELY if ever go to the theater for the same reason you do including blathering idiots, assholes with laser beam bright text screens, triple dicks that can't seems to reach into the pop corn bag without crumpling all 4 corners consistently & the ever present jackass that laughs like a mule at non existent punchlines (I personally throw my cane at them).

A few folks know I used to work at a drive-in movie theater back in the 80s & had it not been for the fact that I could run the whole place for just me & a few of my friends on occasion (like a giant video screen) I would probably have passed on that too.

But still, people still had a modicum of an idea of how the f*k to behave in a theater at that time.

57.9.2012 09:02

friends don't let friends watch CAMS

Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest news

VLC hits milestone: over 5 billion downloads VLC hits milestone: over 5 billion downloads (16 Mar 2024 4:31)
VLC Media Player, the versatile video-software powerhouse, has achieved a remarkable feat: it has been downloaded over 5 billion times.
1 user comment
Sideloading apps to Android gets easier, as Google settles its lawsuit Sideloading apps to Android gets easier, as Google settles its lawsuit (19 Dec 2023 11:09)
Google settled its lawsuit in September 2023, and one of the settlement terms was that the way applications are installed on Android from outside the Google Play Store must become simpler. In the future, installing APK files will be easier.
8 user comments
Roomba Combo j7+ review - Clever trick allows robot vacuum finally to tackle home with rugs and carpets Roomba Combo j7+ review - Clever trick allows robot vacuum finally to tackle home with rugs and carpets (06 Jun 2023 9:19)
Roomba Combo j7+ is the very first Roomba model to combine robot vacuum with mopping features. And Roomba Combo j7+ does all that with a very clever trick, which tackles the problem with mopping and carpets. But is it any good? We found out.
Neato, the robot vacuum company, ends its operations Neato, the robot vacuum company, ends its operations (02 May 2023 3:38)
Neato Robotics has ceased its operations. American robot vacuum pioneer founded in 2005 has finally called it quits and company will cease its operations and sales. Only a skeleton crew will remain who will keep the servers running until 2028.
5 user comments
How to Send Messages to Yourself on WhatsApp How to Send Messages to Yourself on WhatsApp (20 Mar 2023 1:25)
The world's most popular messaging platform, Meta-owned WhatsApp has enabled sending messages to yourself. While at first, this might seem like an odd feature, it can be very useful in a lot of situations. ....
18 user comments

News archive