why is Galaxy s3 running on Jelly Bean? that is not even a right test.
Well... We are talking about 2 completely different operating systems here; which I am sure either side of the debate table would argue is better at their job than the other - so who could/would argue that the testing software is actually returning actual, functional, quantifiable test results?
In actuality we'd have to run some form of non biased basic software platform on both phones, 'then' run the test platform in order to get a "true" matrix. Otherwise we're just getting a mish-mash of he said, she said.
Theoretically Apple is running one app at a time while the Samsung is running 2 or more, thus pulling more cycles & limiting the results as well. Opinion yes, but plausible too.
Until the phones can be put in the previously mentioned parameters it's an unjust bit of propaganda written up favoring Apple & 'could' be misconstrewed as an advertising payoff toward Mashable.
This test was a bit wishy washy in my book. Not sure what to make of it. It seemed this guy was from the mac world and would not do a proper test.
Honestly i am still not convinced I like mt S3 and am sticking with it.
He also forgot to mentioned how locked down the iPhone still is with it still needing iTunes. When they make the file structure more visible and less dependent on their own applications I may give the Apple iPhone another run. At the moment to do what you really want to achieve with the iPhone you will have to use 3rd party Apps still on your computer.
My decision is pending...
see if you test the s3 and iphone5 from here in the uk you will find the s3 is better as it runs Exynos 4412 Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A9 and the iphone 5 has A6 Dual-core 1.2 GHz both with 1gb of ram.
Don't get me wrong the Iphone is a good phone and has coen a long way from when it first stared and im glad they changed the charging connector so they can make a thinner phone and if your a apple person then the iphone5 with the new Mountain Lion make it easy to communicat with phone to mac book or desktop.
Now looking at the samsung galaxy s3 and what makes it extra special from other android phone makers is that samsung make there own chips so you know the phones have the best at that time and have been tested before they even come to the phones.
The thing I like about android vs ios is I feel there is more apps and I love useing bluetooth an nfc. We all know the Iphone has nfc as well but the bluetooth part bugs me.
all in all mac desktop and laptop useres are better with the iphone and people like me are better with android.
At the end of the day we could sit here and say what phone is fater and this one has this and this oen has that. Its really up to witch one would you use the most what one feels right in your had. I have the Samsung galaxy nexus and to be honest I love it.
Advice go and get a demo when the note2 comes out in about a month and get a demo on the Iphone 5 not matter what phone you get if your happy dont let anyone tell you any different.
So, Apple's newest phone can beat a 3-month-old Android...let's see how the note smacks it around when the iPhone5 is only a month old...and it is just downhill from there as we see a flood of quad-core and intel phones released after that and before the iPhone6...but I really don't care if the new iPhone can play some game I don't want better, nor do I care that the Note II will play the same game better than the new iPhone. That's not what I want my phone to do. Show me a video of an iPhone5 with a screen that is bigger (or even the same size) as an Android from last summer. Better yet, show me a video of an iPhone made by a company that doesn't sue people for using rectangles with rounded corners.
LOl, the guy can't do a speedtest even though that app is on the play marketplace.
I've paid for geekbench and I got 1848 on my Galaxy S3 international, without app killing anything and that wasn't all 4 cores only 3 cores.
There are higher scores over 1900 from Galaxy S 3.
The 1648 is the highest Iphone 5 geekbench score I've seen yet still no where near what my own phone has done in that benchmark.
Originally posted by chefdamo:The Galaxy S 3 has 1.5 gig of program ram.
see if you test the s3 and iphone5 from here in the uk you will find the s3 is better as it runs Exynos 4412 Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A9 and the iphone 5 has A6 Dual-core 1.2 GHz both with 1gb of ram.
Originally posted by zro214:
Lol at the iphone haters
Originally posted by xtago:International Galaxy S3 has quad-core CPU and 1GB RAM, the US-and-other-weird-places version has dual-core and 2GB RAM.
Originally posted by chefdamo:The Galaxy S 3 has 1.5 gig of program ram.
see if you test the s3 and iphone5 from here in the uk you will find the s3 is better as it runs Exynos 4412 Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A9 and the iphone 5 has A6 Dual-core 1.2 GHz both with 1gb of ram.
Looks like there is no end to the pissing contests.
Originally posted by KillerBug:lol love it killerbug nice way to put it lol
So, Apple's newest phone can beat a 3-month-old Android...let's see how the note smacks it around when the iPhone5 is only a month old...and it is just downhill from there as we see a flood of quad-core and intel phones released after that and before the iPhone6...but I really don't care if the new iPhone can play some game I don't want better, nor do I care that the Note II will play the same game better than the new iPhone. That's not what I want my phone to do. Show me a video of an iPhone5 with a screen that is bigger (or even the same size) as an Android from last summer. Better yet, show me a video of an iPhone made by a company that doesn't sue people for using rectangles with rounded corners.
Originally posted by JST1946:Amen. Even if the Iphone5 had an 8core processor that beat all android phones by a mile, android fanboys would still hate the Iphone and find other reasons to bash the idevices.
Looks like there is no end to the pissing contests.
Originally posted by guy8689:I don't hate iPhone owners...I do hate Apple, and I don't like that people support them in spite of their actions, but the only Apple supporters I hate are their lawyers (who probably have BB phones). That said, I do think there is a lot of ignorance in the phone markets. I've met Apple users that bashed android because it is hard to use, who then used my phone without any issues when they had no AT&T service. I've also met BB users who bashed android because there is no email notification LED...and I think there are only a handful of Android phones that ever excluded this feature.
Originally posted by JST1946:Amen. Even if the Iphone5 had an 8core processor that beat all android phones by a mile, android fanboys would still hate the Iphone and find other reasons to bash the idevices.
Looks like there is no end to the pissing contests.
This war will never end and with all the labels we have to separate ourselves as human beings, I find it really pathetic that ppl will go as far as hating other ppl just because of the type of phone they have in their pocket.
They really need to understand that a preference in a certain phone or company is suggestive. You cant argue with that. It doesnt matter at ALL if another phone is faster or smaller or larger screen. If someone prefers a Blackberry over an Android or Iphone, let them be!
Looks like the iPhone 5 is on hold for a little while.
http://news.yahoo.com/apple-supplier-ha...-055718608.html
Originally posted by chefdamo:Galaxy S3 is 2gb of ram....
see if you test the s3 and iphone5 from here in the uk you will find the s3 is better as it runs Exynos 4412 Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A9 and the iphone 5 has A6 Dual-core 1.2 GHz both with 1gb of ram.
Don't get me wrong the Iphone is a good phone and has coen a long way from when it first stared and im glad they changed the charging connector so they can make a thinner phone and if your a apple person then the iphone5 with the new Mountain Lion make it easy to communicat with phone to mac book or desktop.
Now looking at the samsung galaxy s3 and what makes it extra special from other android phone makers is that samsung make there own chips so you know the phones have the best at that time and have been tested before they even come to the phones.
The thing I like about android vs ios is I feel there is more apps and I love useing bluetooth an nfc. We all know the Iphone has nfc as well but the bluetooth part bugs me.
all in all mac desktop and laptop useres are better with the iphone and people like me are better with android.
At the end of the day we could sit here and say what phone is fater and this one has this and this oen has that. Its really up to witch one would you use the most what one feels right in your had. I have the Samsung galaxy nexus and to be honest I love it.
Advice go and get a demo when the note2 comes out in about a month and get a demo on the Iphone 5 not matter what phone you get if your happy dont let anyone tell you any different.
Originally posted by LordRuss:
Well... We are talking about 2 completely different operating systems here; which I am sure either side of the debate table would argue is better at their job than the other - so who could/would argue that the testing software is actually returning actual, functional, quantifiable test results?
In actuality we'd have to run some form of non biased basic software platform on both phones, 'then' run the test platform in order to get a "true" matrix. Otherwise we're just getting a mish-mash of he said, she said.
Theoretically Apple is running one app at a time while the Samsung is running 2 or more, thus pulling more cycles & limiting the results as well. Opinion yes, but plausible too.
Until the phones can be put in the previously mentioned parameters it's an unjust bit of propaganda written up favoring Apple & 'could' be misconstrewed as an advertising payoff toward Mashable.
Originally posted by LordRuss:A Friend and myself both Ran Geekbench 2 on the iPhone 5 and Galaxy S3, we both killed all other running apps that the OS did not rely on. If anything is running the OS relies on then that has to be taken into account as the user is always subject to any performance degradation of OS dependant tasks. The result from GeekBench 2 was that the iPhone received a better score by some two hundred at around 1600 where as the Galaxy S3 was around 1400 (I cannot remember the exact numbers). I am not bias either way but these are the facts.
Well... We are talking about 2 completely different operating systems here; which I am sure either side of the debate table would argue is better at their job than the other - so who could/would argue that the testing software is actually returning actual, functional, quantifiable test results?
In actuality we'd have to run some form of non biased basic software platform on both phones, 'then' run the test platform in order to get a "true" matrix. Otherwise we're just getting a mish-mash of he said, she said.
Theoretically Apple is running one app at a time while the Samsung is running 2 or more, thus pulling more cycles & limiting the results as well. Opinion yes, but plausible too.
Until the phones can be put in the previously mentioned parameters it's an unjust bit of propaganda written up favoring Apple & 'could' be misconstrewed as an advertising payoff toward Mashable.
Originally posted by mukhis:Sheeps eh???
Originally posted by zro214:
Lol at the iphone haters
LMFAO at the isheeps.
Originally posted by bloke2000:
A Friend and myself both Ran Geekbench 2 on the iPhone 5 and Galaxy S3, we both killed all other running apps that the OS did not rely on. If anything is running the OS relies on then that has to be taken into account as the user is always subject to any performance degradation of OS dependant tasks. The result from GeekBench 2 was that the iPhone received a better score by some two hundred at around 1600 where as the Galaxy S3 was around 1400 (I cannot remember the exact numbers). I am not bias either way but these are the facts.
Yaaaawwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnn....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
