AfterDawn: Tech news

Is Google hiding $10 billion in revenue in Bermuda tax-shelter?

Written by Andre Yoskowitz @ 10 Dec 2012 10:35 User comments (16)

Is Google hiding $10 billion in revenue in Bermuda tax-shelter? According to their recent filings, Google was able to avoid almost $2 billion in worldwide income taxes in 2011 by moving $10 billion in revenue to a shell company incorporated in Bermuda.
Bermuda does not have a corporate income tax, and the $10 billion was about 80 percent of Google's total pretax profit during the year.

The news is likely not good for Google, who is facing increased scrutiny in France, the UK, Italy and Australia over legal tax dodging. The EU, specifically, is asking member states to create anti-abuse rules for tax avoidance including creating a blacklist of tax havens, such as Bermuda and the Caymans.

For its part, Google stresses everything they do is completely legal (which it is) and that they boost the economies of the nations in which they employ workers: "For example, we also employ over 2,000 people, help hundreds of thousands of businesses to grow online, and invest millions supporting new tech businesses in East London." In the UK, Google paid $10 million in taxes on $4.1 billion in revenue.



In 2011, Google reported a tax rate of 3.2 percent on its overseas profits, even though most of its foreign sales in those nations should have had tax rates around 28 percent. Google is certainly not the only company to use such tactics, as Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Starbucks and other giants employ the same maneuvering.

Previous Next  

16 user comments

111.12.2012 00:10

Good for them. They won't gain anything by being the only major company to stupidly donate $2 billion dollars to world governments when presented with the option to legally avoid them. Hell, I'd do it too if I could.

211.12.2012 01:14

When I have legal ways to avoid spending money, I usually take advantage of them too! And all this time I thought I was the only one!

311.12.2012 01:16

Originally posted by Notcow:
Good for them. They won't gain anything by being the only major company to stupidly donate $2 billion dollars to world governments when presented with the option to legally avoid them. Hell, I'd do it too if I could.
agreed, I don't know where people get off saying "you didn't pay all of the taxes!" We don't need all of these taxes, we need a lean government. It's not the place of the damn government to steal from me... Ayn Rand all the way!

411.12.2012 09:21

Keep it up Google, Apple, Amazon, etc. :) I am honestly impressed by their actions. Nothing sweeter than edited by ddp over governments.

This message has been edited since its posting. Latest edit was made on 12 Dec 2012 @ 3:26

511.12.2012 17:51

This article needs more about how Starbucks haven't paid their taxes either.

612.12.2012 02:47

starbucks isnt tech related and what what i hear there coffee is a joke anyway,ive often been told worse in the world.

back on topic

apparently there are tax holes in every country but its usually politicians that seem to find the loop holes and take advantage of them.good work google.

712.12.2012 07:37

Quote:
starbucks isnt tech related and what what i hear there coffee is a joke anyway,ive often been told worse in the world.
You don't say.

My original point being, who cares?

813.12.2012 19:22

I'm just jealous I can't afford to keep a team of tax attorneys and politicians working for me, damn!
It would be more interesting to see the real cost of avoiding the taxes, plus the actual taxes as a percentage.

913.12.2012 19:34

Originally posted by Ripper:
Quote:
starbucks isnt tech related and what what i hear there coffee is a joke anyway,ive often been told worse in the world.
You don't say.

My original point being, who cares?
>Website is tech related.
>Article is about tech related companies dodging taxes.

If they were to list every company guilty of tax dodging and include the non-tech related ones, this article would be unnecessarily large list.

1013.12.2012 20:05

That's cute but, no, you still missed my point. I shall clarify because reading is hard.

I was originally being facetious, sorry that it was lost on you. My point was not who cares that Starbucks is not a tech related company despite this article being written on a tech site (lol, should I be insulted?), rather who cares that any of them evaded their taxes at all. It's not just but it is what it is.

What if your local PC repair bloke took some cash jobs on the side? Would you be sending him up shit creek to the IRS/HMRC (or whoever you have in your respective country) without a paddle, or would you not be bothered at all? Probably the latter.

Quote:
The EU, specifically, is asking member states to create anti-abuse rules for tax avoidance including creating a blacklist of tax havens, such as Bermuda and the Caymans.
The issue lies in the quote above and that should be people's focus - not witch-hunting companies who have exploited what is only good business sense. I'm merely being pragmatic about it; you solve the issue at the root of it and it begins to get better. If not, shall we just get angry every year when Google posts a suspiciously low tax filing but not actually do anything about it?

1114.12.2012 08:54

Sometimes I just have to shake my head in disbelief when reading some of these posts.

These large corps are tax-dodging, plain and simple. While it is still legal, for now... it's still a shit move and ultimately hurts the little guy. Yeah... that's you and I.

It's amazing how you guys will support large corps not paying taxes (think funding for education, medical assistance, etc...) yet you'll turn right around and publicly voice how the entertainment industry is nothing but a bunch of money-grabbing scumbags when it comes to articles about them trying to recoup funds stolen through piracy.

What a bunch of hypocrites.

1214.12.2012 10:27

If it's just fine, even a great patriotic thing to do for a presidential candidate, why wouldn't it be OK for Google???

1314.12.2012 11:19

The point is that it's not ok for ANYONE to be doing it. How is that hard to understand?

1414.12.2012 19:23

The practice is unfair and unfortunate but what can you do? Google and a number of other companies have international revenue streams that can be diverted to tax havens. The real brick & mortar manufacturing companies - genuine job creators - with only US operations are the ones who actually bear the brunt and burden. What I can't figure out is how Romney whose activity is strictly that of corporate raiding within US manage to have income hived off to the Caymans? Oh ! I get it. Bain Capitol is registered in Caymans! AND he gets tax write off for his car elevator in the US.

1515.12.2012 01:53

Originally posted by bhetrick:
It's amazing how you guys will support large corps not paying taxes (think funding for education, medical assistance, etc...) yet you'll turn right around and publicly voice how the entertainment industry is nothing but a bunch of money-grabbing scumbags when it comes to articles about them trying to recoup funds stolen through piracy.

What a bunch of hypocrites.
Actually there's a pretty clear distinction there. Google uses laws to shaft the government, the entertainment industry uses laws to shaft individuals. Now do you see why many individuals here view the two differently?

1615.12.2012 03:52

Originally posted by bhetrick:
Sometimes I just have to shake my head in disbelief when reading some of these posts.

These large corps are tax-dodging, plain and simple. While it is still legal, for now... it's still a shit move and ultimately hurts the little guy. Yeah... that's you and I.

It's amazing how you guys will support large corps not paying taxes (think funding for education, medical assistance, etc...) yet you'll turn right around and publicly voice how the entertainment industry is nothing but a bunch of money-grabbing scumbags when it comes to articles about them trying to recoup funds stolen through piracy.

What a bunch of hypocrites.
What? Who is in support of large crops not paying taxes? That's not even within the domain of this site. Any rational person is for a moderate crop tax. Furthermore, I don't expect large companies to voluntarily donate money to the government when they're not technically required to. Seems like you're having trouble understanding. It seems that you interpreted the article as having an anti-corporate spin put on it, when I think Andre intended it to be pretty neutral.

To ask companies to pay taxes that they're not required to pay is akin to asking them to sacrifice a large portion of their revenue.
This message has been edited since its posting. Latest edit was made on 15 Dec 2012 @ 3:54

Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest news

VLC hits milestone: over 5 billion downloads VLC hits milestone: over 5 billion downloads (16 Mar 2024 4:31)
VLC Media Player, the versatile video-software powerhouse, has achieved a remarkable feat: it has been downloaded over 5 billion times.
1 user comment
Sideloading apps to Android gets easier, as Google settles its lawsuit Sideloading apps to Android gets easier, as Google settles its lawsuit (19 Dec 2023 11:09)
Google settled its lawsuit in September 2023, and one of the settlement terms was that the way applications are installed on Android from outside the Google Play Store must become simpler. In the future, installing APK files will be easier.
8 user comments
Roomba Combo j7+ review - Clever trick allows robot vacuum finally to tackle home with rugs and carpets Roomba Combo j7+ review - Clever trick allows robot vacuum finally to tackle home with rugs and carpets (06 Jun 2023 9:19)
Roomba Combo j7+ is the very first Roomba model to combine robot vacuum with mopping features. And Roomba Combo j7+ does all that with a very clever trick, which tackles the problem with mopping and carpets. But is it any good? We found out.
Neato, the robot vacuum company, ends its operations Neato, the robot vacuum company, ends its operations (02 May 2023 3:38)
Neato Robotics has ceased its operations. American robot vacuum pioneer founded in 2005 has finally called it quits and company will cease its operations and sales. Only a skeleton crew will remain who will keep the servers running until 2028.
5 user comments
How to Send Messages to Yourself on WhatsApp How to Send Messages to Yourself on WhatsApp (20 Mar 2023 1:25)
The world's most popular messaging platform, Meta-owned WhatsApp has enabled sending messages to yourself. While at first, this might seem like an odd feature, it can be very useful in a lot of situations. ....
18 user comments

News archive