This verdict has given the RIAA stronger legal precedence to use in future cases. U.S. District Court Judge Michael Davis had wanted to instruct the jury that the record companies would have to prove that actual copying took place in order to show copyright infringement. However, record company attorney Richard Gabriel argued that in other cases, simply making files available was found to be infringement, forcing the Judge to change his mind.
"Record labels don't like that because it's harder to prove," said Andrew Bridges, an attorney who has argued for the Computer & Communications Industry Association that copyright holders should have to prove the offered material is actually used. "It's all about whether they get a free pass to impose onerous damages on people without actually having to prove a case."
Source:
Yahoo (AP)