| Discuss this article! |
There are more user comments available, read them here |
| thegrunt (Senior Member) 30 July 2007 14:47 |
|
Quote: Porn is disgusting...
You must be a chick lol
|
| ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 30 July 2007 14:57 |
|
|
Porn is porn you either "get" it or you do not LOL
But yes mainstream Japaneses porn is censored, hardcore stuff is treated unfairly and shuffled off to the sidelines, at least it is last I checked.
Its like the bleeping of words in a hentai game or in henati (pron animation) you have to wonder WTF is going on with their system that they would bleep stuff out of adult metaril.....
Unfocused
I also notice US porn is highly staged and they use lubes a bit to much and you NEVER see a female get wet without the use of lube, at least the Japaneses focus a bit more on the body and "areas" than the USs porn "when the male is done the scene ends" crap...
|
| Unfocused (Junior Member) 30 July 2007 14:57 |
|
|
Who would have ever thought that we we be discussing the technical merits of porn here on AfterDawn?
So, being that I can buy 4 and 6 hour Standard Definition DVD's, does this mean that I can now buy the 12+ hour Mega Cum Spectacular on Blu Ray?
|
| Unfocused (Junior Member) 30 July 2007 15:05 |
|
|
@Zippy
That is because most US porn is made with the male focus in mind. You have a few directors out there such as Andrew Blake and Candida Royale who set their bar a little higher. They try to make a more stylized story/fantasy setting. Candida (Director) makes her material with more of the female focus in mind. She used to be a mainstream porn actress, but is one of the few in the industry that is trying to change the whole perspective.
You have those such as Tracy Lords who deny the industry and the things that go on there, and then there are those such as Jenna Jameson who really raise public awareness of the whole industry.
|
| ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 30 July 2007 15:12 |
|
Originally posted by Unfocused: @Zippy
That is because most US porn is made with the male focus in mind. You have a few directors out there such as Andrew Blake and Candida Royale who set their bar a little higher. They try to make a more stylized story/fantasy setting. Candida (Director) makes her material with more of the female focus in mind. She used to be a mainstream porn actress, but is one of the few in the industry that is trying to change the whole perspective.
You have those such as Tracy Lords who deny the industry and the things that go on there, and then there are those such as Jenna Jameson who really raise public awareness of the whole industry.
Ya mostly why I hate "pron" its must to male focused I am far mroe infested int the female body and its workings yet I get a bunch of dick heads roaming around for pssy its sad really,while I am not a great fan of porn of any kind I do dislike most US porn because it likes the most depth (pun intented :P)
Frankly Story has no place in porn I am sorry but.....foreplay however is a whole other thing :P
I'd kill for some good striping/female 1on1 vids but it seems no one can think past their head to make them >>
|
| borhan9 (AfterDawn Addict) 30 July 2007 20:06 |
|
|
I remember reading somewhere else that this was the case that porn was going to decide which format was going to win the format war. I think we have a winner. :)
|
| ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 30 July 2007 20:13 |
|
Originally posted by borhan9: I remember reading somewhere else that this was the case that porn was going to decide which format was going to win the format war. I think we have a winner. :)
some how I doubt censored porn will do that (mainstream japanase porn is censored) and I doubt the non mainstream stuff can get BR license so easily.
ah well they bypassed some red tape to get the "press rolling"..nice desu :P
http://www.arnnet.com.au/index.php/id;1542470912;fp;16;fpid;1
|
| Unfocused (Junior Member) 30 July 2007 23:35 |
|
|
Didn't the Blu Ray camp at one point say that they would not allow porn on their format?
|
| Snatched (Junior Member) 31 July 2007 9:21 |
|
Originally posted by thegrunt: Sweet,cum in 1080p lol
That was the funnest thing I've read in a few months.
LOL
|
| jimmer (Newbie) 31 July 2007 10:31 |
|
wow, censored with mosaics in HD...
lame
|
| ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 31 July 2007 10:55 |
|
Originally posted by Unfocused: Didn't the Blu Ray camp at one point say that they would not allow porn on their format?
Oh ya in fact if you read the link I post it goes over it saying some in BR industry can not come into contact with "adult" contracts but they found a middle man so they got the ball rolling on it.
puns :P
|
| BIGnewb (Inactive) 31 July 2007 12:19 |
|
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL wow i guess sony got the biggest and most akward boost in sales right there :P
|
| ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 31 July 2007 12:48 |
|
Originally posted by BIGnewb: LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL wow i guess sony got the biggest and most akward boost in sales right there :P
who knows but at elast its not defult ban on porn just you need the right back door man!
what?? why are you looking at me funny??
LOL
|
| Unfocused (Junior Member) 31 July 2007 20:01 |
|
|
So, does this mean that Blu Ray has been "given the shaft" so to speak?
|
| ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 31 July 2007 20:11 |
|
Originally posted by Unfocused: So, does this mean that Blu Ray has been "given the shaft" so to speak?
I think they will take gay porn too just not threw normal ports...er...channles
LOL
oh god I is evil :P
Bascily BR is trying to keep tis holier than thou image and make it just a bit harder for porn to come aboard...as it where.....(this is fun :P )
|
| Unfocused (Junior Member) 31 July 2007 22:53 |
|
|
@Zippy
So the back door man is picking an open outlet and filling the need?
|
| ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 1 August 2007 9:47 |
|
Originally posted by Unfocused: @Zippy
So the back door man is picking an open outlet and filling the need?
No more like a middle man is contracted out to fill the areas the normal man can not :P
|
| morguex (Inactive) 7 August 2007 13:14 |
|
Please stop with all the buns, oops I mean puns, You guys are killing me.
One thing I will say though, I've seen a few pornos that were shot in HD format(watched them with my upconverting DvD player) and damm lets just say, when you've been ridden hard and often things start to get nasty looking. I can't go into too much detail, but I think you know what I mean.
Peace all
|
| ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 7 August 2007 13:27 |
|
Originally posted by morguex: Please stop with all the buns, oops I mean puns, You guys are killing me.
One thing I will say though, I've seen a few pornos that were shot in HD format(watched them with my upconverting DvD player) and damm lets just say, when you've been ridden hard and often things start to get nasty looking. I can't go into too much detail, but I think you know what I mean.
Peace all
Puns are fun :P
and ya beaten pussys look nasty,why would someone want to beat a cat like that I dunno.....
|
| lackyno (Member) 11 August 2007 3:39 |
|
With a name like Blu-Ray, it's only tight fitting that it goes head in hand with Blu-Movies.
It's better to die than to live without hope...
|
| Unfocused (Junior Member) 14 August 2007 17:43 |
|
@morguex
That "brings up" an angle that I hadn't thought of before. Seeing the HD stuff on Discovery channel is really a good way of selling the whole High Definition idea.
If some of the porn that I've seen (and I've seen my share) looks that crisp, I wont say that I'll get turned off of porn, but I really might have to raise my standards to watching reputable studio porn.
Stuff like Black Street Hookers, Little Latin Angels and the like just don't seem like they would stand up to the likes of Vivid.
Wow, this thread has really been about "self discovery," if I'm actually thinking about raising my standards in regards to watching porn, something isn't right.
|
| ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 14 August 2007 21:19 |
|
Originally posted by Unfocused: @morguex
That "brings up" an angle that I hadn't thought of before. Seeing the HD stuff on Discovery channel is really a good way of selling the whole High Definition idea.
If some of the porn that I've seen (and I've seen my share) looks that crisp, I wont say that I'll get turned off of porn, but I really might have to raise my standards to watching reputable studio porn.
Stuff like Black Street Hookers, Little Latin Angels and the like just don't seem like they would stand up to the likes of Vivid.
Wow, this thread has really been about "self discovery," if I'm actually thinking about raising my standards in regards to watching porn, something isn't right.
studio porn is overly dry and scripted, the "B" class stuff is not much better but it has a higher chance of being less......... dry and scripted LOL
FIGHT THE M.A.F.I.A.A.
|
| Unfocused (Junior Member) 17 August 2007 6:31 |
|
|
Yes, but with Studio porn, you have a greater chance of not seeing something like a band-aid on someones ass. That demands an instant press of the next chapter button.
I agree that the smaller labels put out better quality as far as the action is concerned, but the studios have the advantage with the desirable actresses and slightly higher values in regards to what the camera can see.
|
| ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 17 August 2007 6:36 |
|
Originally posted by Unfocused: Yes, but with Studio porn, you have a greater chance of not seeing something like a band-aid on someones ass. That demands an instant press of the next chapter button.
I agree that the smaller labels put out better quality as far as the action is concerned, but the studios have the advantage with the desirable actresses and slightly higher values in regards to what the camera can see.
that or "questionable scaring" or acme or boles LOL
FIGHT THE M.A.F.I.A.A.
|
| Unfocused (Junior Member) 17 August 2007 6:38 |
|
|
Puts a whole new spin on the term fire crotch...
|
| xhardc0re (Senior Member) 29 September 2007 6:20 |
|
|
pr0n FTW!1!! def!
|