User User name Password  
   
Wednesday 20.8.2008 / 06:48 AM
Search:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > universal music files infringement suit against veoh
Show topics
News
News

Universal Music files infringement suit against Veoh

7 September 2007 5:59 by Rich "vurbal" Fiscus | 1 comment

Universal Music files infringement suit against Veoh Universal Music Group is suing viral video site operator Veoh Networks for copyright infringement.

The suit, which is similar to those YouTube is currently defending itself against, has a somewhat unique twist. Less than two months ago Veoh Networks filed a suit of their own against Universal. That suit claimed the music giant had sent letters threatening legal action over copyright infringement, but included no specific details to back up that claim. Veoh's suit was intended as a pre-emptive strike to force Universal to back down.

At the time there was speculation that Universal was really looking for a licensing deal similar to the one they worked out with YouTube. Much like the situation with Veoh, in that case Universal filed a lawsuit, but then they dropped the suit after coming reaching an agreement on licensing. It's even possible this tactic may have gotten them more favorable terms, with the lawsuit hanging over YouTube's head being a good reason to come to agreement or else.

While Universal's new suit calls Veoh "a massive copyright infringer that has built its business on the back of others' intellectual property," it's possible that the music company's lack of specifics to the video site may be their undoing.

YouTube has always claimed that by following the DMCA's so-called takedown rules, which require copyright holders to inform them about infringing content so it can be removed, shields them from any infringement claims. If they are correct about that, it seems unlikely that Universal, who apparently hasn't been informing Veoh of specific instances of infringement, is simply allowing it to occur so they can complain about it.

According a written statement from Veoh CEO Steve Mitgang, "UMG’s action is not surprising and reflects their Limited understanding of Veoh and of the online video space as a whole." It went on to say "Veoh is recognized by many media companies as a DMCA-compliant company and is committed to respecting the rights of content owners. In fact, we’re currently working cooperatively with major media companies and the MPAA to develop standards for copyright protection. It’s unfortunate that UMG prefers to continue their pattern of litigation rather than contribute to the important discussions going on within the new media industry."

A spokesman for Universal, Peter Lofrumento, said in a statement that Veoh's business plan "is based on theft" and "deprives UMG and its artists and songwriters of compensation for their work."

Maybe we shouldn't be surprised that a leading member of the RIAA, which has taken to financial negotiation by lawsuit with consumers, would do the show the same arrogance in their dealings with a much smaller company.

Source: Wired

Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • Veoh adds videos from Hulu (16 January 2008)
  • More Hollywood insiders back Veoh (12 September 2007)
  • DivX follows Veoh's lead and takes Universal to court (9 September 2007)
  • EFF shows how RIAA lawsuits have failed (29 August 2007)
  • RIAA sued by consumer citing illegal tactics (17 August 2007)
  • Veoh sues Universal Music over alleged threats (11 August 2007)
  • Another class action suit against YouTube (6 August 2007)
  • Japanese groups join YouTube bashing (2 August 2007)
  • VeohTV turns web surfing into channel surfing (15 July 2007)
  • Universal Music Group sues MySpace (19 November 2006)
  • Universal sues two video sharing sites (17 October 2006)
  • Universal music group boss can't wait to sue british file-sharers (23 September 2004)
  • Universal seeks $450M from MP3.com tomorrow (5 September 2000)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    DoJ says net neutrality is a bad choice for consumers
    Next news article »
    Apple DRM attacked as anti-comptetitive in Florida lawsuit
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    borhan9 (AfterDawn Addict) 11 September 2007 1:12 Send private message to this user   
    here we go again with the lawsuits again. just a different name.
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums | DVD X Copy Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi | fin.MP3Lizard.com
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2008 by AfterDawn Ltd.