|
Reality is, to get a good picture at a decent resolution and still have some internet left to be of any use your going to need an 8meg pipe and upwards.
Heres another problem, virtually no one apart from the inner cities where fiber or cable is abundant can even get above 8meg and then its expensive.
And yet another problem, BT should have shot the dead horse that was dsl in the foot years back and just spent all the development money putting us in a fibe infrastructure that could have lasted us decades as hughjars said.
I belive BT worked closely with BELL technologies to create DSL, however soon as BELL got their working they waved bye bye to BT who i belive finnished the project on their own. Which would explain why it doesnt as well.
so we ended up with ADSL, and its not like proper dsl like most of the rest of the world we have to put up with asynchronous.
What makes it worse is most of the ADSL providers will lie through their teeth to make more money out of you, i have not lost count of the amount of people i have meet who have say had 1 meg upgraded say 4 meg or even possibly 8 meg. To only find out that their local exchange was either never 8meg enabled so it was impossible for them to get the full speed they were paying for. Im most cases its they are paying for 4 but still only receiving one due to transmission distance.
Half the time the DSL provides also send out their adaptor with excessivly high mtu settings which can cause slowness on routing, most people i meet notice a better increase from setting the mtu properly over paying BT an extra £100 a year for something you cant really get.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 29 September 2007 1:58
|