| Discuss this article! |
| sciascia (Junior Member) 28 November 2007 21:26 |
|
I guess the real question is, how does this format stack up to Blu-Ray and HDDVD?
|
| DVD_Dude (Newbie) 28 November 2007 22:57 |
|
um... I just drew a picture on a blank DVD-R disc using a Sharpy. It probably has a better chance of surpassing Blu-Ray or HD-DVD than VMD does in the US.
|
| spydah (Junior Member) 28 November 2007 23:02 |
|
hahah another format wow. This isnt surprising at all.
|
| gleone (Newbie) 28 November 2007 23:08 |
|
|
HD-VMD doesn't have a Snowball's chance in Hell. Good luck!
|
| banshee07 (Junior Member) 28 November 2007 23:12 |
|
wow this just might take HD-DVD to third place lmao
|
| sciascia (Junior Member) 28 November 2007 23:41 |
|
|
Hey wait a minute people. The war on formats has only just begun. Imagine if this format is on par with blu-ray/HDDVD's standards yet retains the price of original DVDs? I'd say format war over, over real quick.
Infact, after reading the wiki page on it, I'd have to say it has a pretty good chance of standing its ground. Maybe someone more knowledgeable can step in here and give us a run down on the format.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 28 November 2007 23:44
|
| themind (Junior Member) 28 November 2007 23:52 |
|
I think this format could do better then hd dvd and blury. If all you need is new software on your pc to play these discs and if you can use dvd r-+ to burn your own homemade hd video disc.
|
| vamsilak (Member) 29 November 2007 0:34 |
|
|
wait a min
this player can read hddvd
or hddvd can read this hdvmd discs
if it is compatible then lets talk about it
and another thing
can we still use our dual layer burner to burn these discs
|
| hughjars (Inactive) 29 November 2007 14:35 |
|
The HD VMD discs are different to DVD5 & DVD9 discs (they can go to 10 layers IIRC).
That means they need new burners too - although prices of each were always promised to be similar to existing DVD5/9 hardware.
Had these been more of a kind of 'DVD +' type of format (ie doing everything that DVD5/9 can do (including Divx/Xvid)
and
be able to do HD using all the HD formats (VC-1, AVC & MPEG2 - these are the 3 formats mandated by both the HD DVD and Blu-ray formats) then they might have a future at least for a few years as an interim format until HD DVD takes over completely ( :P ) .
The ability to use the .mkv container would be extremely interesting.
I just doubt they have the ambition, will or intent to make such a usefully 'broad' format and so will not go to far with this.
|
| juankerr (Member) 29 November 2007 15:08 |
|
Originally posted by hughjars: they might have a future at least for a few years as an interim format until HD DVD takes over completely ( :P
I don't get your reasoning here. Why would you even consider this for an interim step when it's clearly here to compete with the 2 existing formats? For HD DVD's sake HD VMD should be stopped cold in its tracks. Having 3 types of HD media competing for your money is not good for the format that's trying to dominate and eventually compete against SD DVD.
It's similar to the Democracts vs the Republicans in a presidential election. You don't want to see another Ralph Nader taking away votes that should have gone to Al Gore in 2000.
With HD VMD's pricing structure similar to HD DVD guess which market segment they'll be affecting.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 29 November 2007 15:21
|
| hughjars (Inactive) 29 November 2007 15:38 |
|
Originally posted by juankerr: I don't get your reasoning here. Why would you even consider this for an interim step when it's clearly here to compete with the 2 existing formats?
- 3 really.
Don't forget SD (red laser) DVD.
It's really as a new kind of red laser DVD that I can see this having much of a chance.
IMO we'll all still have red laser DVD for some time to come and instead of moving directly to HD DVD
(let's just say for arguments sake)
it's possible (from HD VMD's POV) that an all-singing-an-all-dancing red laser DVD might be a credible idea, particularly if prices are keen enough (but sadly, for them, since the recent HD DVD price cuts they are nowhere near low enough)
Especially if the burner & players could handle things like .mkv files and so easily able play all the HD content people are downloading now and needing to use their PC to play.
TBH this is the route I expect HD DVD to take.
HD DVD prices have dropped so far & so fast that anyone looking to buy a new SD DVD player
(so long as it's not absolutely the bottom end of the market)
might as not bother & should just buy an HD DVD player which will play all their DVDs perfectly well (and they all upscale beautifully).
Sadly they haven't added Divx/Xvid capability to the Toshiba HD DVD players yet but it may come in a firmware.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 29 November 2007 15:41
|
| marcusita (Senior Member) 30 November 2007 8:31 |
|
|
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 30 November 2007 8:35
|
| Alienns (Newbie) 10 December 2007 8:19 |
|
If we know that Panasonic was already released a final standard BluRay player before 2-3 weeks.
Maybe Bluray will win, but let`s see what we will get with this new HD VMD format. Anyway 25gb is not so much for today`s backup.
Remember when cd-r was released a 500 pieces diskettes 3.1/2" was fit on One single cd-r media !!
It will be nice to fit 500 cd-r on one HD VMD (~350 GB) which is enough for today but not will be forever maybe for next 10-15 years will be for sure.
|
| borhan9 (AfterDawn Addict) 20 December 2007 18:57 |
|
Originally posted by sciascia: I guess the real question is, how does this format stack up to Blu-Ray and HDDVD?
ditto.
|