Originally posted by BIGnewb:
i dont get why your still arguing with me?
- Who said my previous comments were all aimed at you, hmmmm?
Originally posted by BIGnewb:
cant you let the article go jeez.like honestly you do have no life.
- LMAO.
Still reducing yourself to needless, ridiculous & dreary little personal attacks, huh?
I guess it's progress you packed in the shouting.
Er, can't you 'let it go'?
Originally posted by BIGnewb:
by the way i read an article on CNET.when they compared Blu-ray to HD DVD, Blu-ray actually is better with more storage and longer hd quality movie lengths.
- S'funny but BD theoretically has a larger 100gb-200gb capacity but you'll not be able to use it on any existing hardware.
HD DVD meanwhile has submitted 17gb per layer up to a total of 51gb triple layer discs to the DVD Forum, if they are approved then it'll be
HD DVD that will have the higher capacity
(and the whole point of the DVD Forum doing this is to enable changes to be agreed & certified in a manner that ensures full backwards compatability to existing players)
.....and that last remaining supposed 'advantage' (BD's theoretically higher
bitrate) is just not needed.
Not when the studios are using modern codecs that can achieve 'transparency' at bitrates
well below HD DVD's own maximum
bitrate transfer speed of 36mb/sec.
You'll also find that with studios (other than Sony) using VC-1 codecs more and more the video encoding is identical rendering all of the BD advantages meaningless.....Warners for instance are a prime example, although the sound is often much better on the
HD DVD version compared to the BD.
Rather hilariously almost ever single 'stinker' of a movie transfer available on high def DVD sits on the BD side of the fence, despite all the supposed 'advantages' BD has, funny that, eh?
Perhaps you should be a little more choosy about what you read and prefer to believe.
Single sources and articles published by 'connected' sources rarely manage to keep their genuine objectivity......and when they drop the facts and start speculating about the future then their opinions remain just that, mere opinions.....and quite often the basis of their speculations is highly partial and selective in what they will tell their readers is just around the corner.
How many 'articles' have you read recently talking about China, Broadcom chipset, the Microsoft reference design & the coming SoC players, hmmmm?
Originally posted by BIGnewb:
if ps3 can lower its price.blu-ray and ps3 will or should win both of their wars.its all up to sony now.
- BD = PS3 is not a winning strategy.
PS3 is too expensive, it's a game console and it will not and in fact simply cannot 'win' this 'war'.
The a/v market will look to a seamless move from SD DVD to high def DVD and that is going to be achieved by
HD DVD as prices drop ever closer to current SD DVD prices.
The Toshiba can be had for $250 now, $200 by X-mas, the Chinese arrive in Q3/4 well under that with SoC chip based solutions.
BD thanks to it's absurd & almost total reliance on PS3 simply cannot compete with that.
PS3 will not be under $200-$150 by the end of the year,
HD DVD stands a very strong chance of making it down to at least $150 when the SoC players arrive towards the end of the year.
BD/PS3 simply have no more big enough cards left to play.
BD will not vanish but as the 'BD exclusive' hardware manufacturers abandon that stance it's going to be pretty much PSP/UMD all over again.
Er, but remind me again, why is it you are still bothering to even discuss this with me?
:lol: