Originally posted by ispy: In theory you should have 1 licence for each TV you own !
- I don't think this is right.
I can recall in the 1970s/80s talk of up to 4 TVs being covered by the licence (which also always did include radio and now computer equipment).....'broadcast receiving equipment' was the original idea I think.
IIRC the situation now is that 1 TV licence covers all the TVs on an individual particular property, so that I can have 10, 20 or 30 TVs in my home if I want to.
Similarly businesses pay a single licence on the basis of the whole premises.
Originally posted by ispy: The BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation)sends round detector vans which can scan neighbourhoods to find people who have no licence,the fines are quite heavy :(
- I know people that worked in this, the TV detector vans do indeed exist but are in a practical sense mostly a myth.
The big deal for catching people without the licence is simply that they use lists of addresses and look for those without a TV licence.
Addresses without a licence stands out and they then go looking (seeing as the vast majority comply with the law on this).
Also people dumb enough to buy a new TV and who don't have a licence but give their address are also easy pickings (although with a more cashless shopping becoming the norm I suppose keeping your dientity and address secret is becoming less easy).
Anyhoo, I'd far rather we kept the licence, commercial terrestrial here is bad enough but satellite TV (or anyone who has seen US TV) shows us the likely path we would end up on if we were daft enough to give up the publicly funded BBC.
It might not always be of the highest standard but compared to a lot of what is out there British TV has benefited enormously in qualitative terms by having the BBC funded the way it is.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 28 July 2007 5:34
|