User User name Password  
   
Tuesday 24.11.2009 / 04:47 AM
Search AfterDawn.com:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > reactions to uk government decision on copyright term extension
Show topics
News
News

Reactions to UK Government decision on copyright term extension

30 July 2007 18:59 by James "Dela" Delahunty | 3 comments

Reactions to UK Government decision on copyright term extension The International record industry reacted to a recent decision by the UK Government not to press the European Commission to extend the term of copyright protection. As expected, the industry's important people had released statements to the press about the decision, which they found shocking and unfair to recording artists and companies alike. Here are some of the notable responses.

"The UK is a world-beating source of great music, so it is frustrating that on the issue of copyright term the Government has shown scant respect for British artists and the UK recording industry. Some of the greatest works of British music will soon be taken away from the artists who performed them and the companies that invested in them. Extending copyright term would promote vital investment in young talent and new music, all of which will help to secure the UK’s future as an exciting music market."
John Kennedy, International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), Chairman & CEO

"This was a test of Government support for British music which it has failed. Ministers appear to have selective hearing on this issue – they have ignored the views of artists and their union, managers, record labels and now even a Parliamentary Select Committee. Opposition MPs and many Labour backbenchers understand the value of fair copyright and support term extension. We will continue to put forward the strong case for fair copyright in Europe. It is profoundly disappointing that we are forced to do so without the backing of the British Government."
Geoff Taylor, Chief Executive, British Phonographic Industry (BPI).

"It seems unjust to deny UK musicians and record labels the same lifetime benefits from their work that other creators enjoy in both the music industry, and in other creative industries. The huge enjoyment derived by fans, of our great legacy of recordings, will cease to earn the artists who made them a penny. This has to be wrong while they are still often reliant on those earnings."
Alison Wenham, AIM Chief Executive and Chairman.

"Thousands of musicians have no pensions and rely on royalties to support themselves. These people helped to create one of Britain's most successful industries, poured money into the British economy and enriched people's lives. They are not asking for a handout, just a fair reward for their creative endeavours."
Roger Daltrey, singer, The Who
Source:
Press Release


Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • Consumer Watchdog says UK Copyright laws are the worst (16 April 2009)
  • EU commissioner wants to extend copyright to 95 years (18 February 2008)
  • EU Commissioner to propose longer copyright term in EU (15 February 2008)
  • Parliament considers changes to U.K. copyright law (9 January 2008)
  • Major piracy market raid in Argentina (20 October 2007)
  • Australian country music pirate arrested (18 October 2007)
  • Swedish report calling for ISP action on piracy welcomed by IFPI (6 September 2007)
  • Germany refuses to cooperate with music industry (4 August 2007)
  • UK government rejects extended copyright term (25 July 2007)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    Anti-piracy raids carried out in Sicily
    Next news article »
    Cyberlink optimizes software for Intel Core 2 Quad Processors
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    tleewade (Newbie) 31 July 2007 7:37 Send private message to this user   
    why should they get paid all thier life for singing the rest of the world doesnt get paid for thier jobs for life.who digs a ditch today and gets paid for the rest of thier life.the music industry is not bright .why should any one get paid for a 100 years ? as homer simpson said D U H.
    borhan9 (AfterDawn Addict) 1 August 2007 19:31 Send private message to this user   
    To me it is important that the artist does get his/her royalties but they would need a pension plan as well because they need a safety net for their retirement.

    The part that gets to me we allow all these old cronies that do not have any idea about the industry to make up the laws.
    Unfocused (Member) 14 August 2007 15:44 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    safety net
    Why would they need this? I look at all the places on cribs and have no pity on the musicians who have no money in 10 or 20 years. My father told me to save and invest my money. Maybe they (the musicians) should also follow this advice.
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2009 by AfterDawn Ltd.