User User name Password  
   
Monday 13.10.2008 / 04:22 AM
Search:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > apple drops price of drm-free tracks on itunes plus
Show topics
News
News

Apple drops price of DRM-free tracks on iTunes Plus

16 October 2007 17:07 by Andre "DVDBack23" Yoskowitz | 5 comments

Apple drops price of DRM-free tracks on iTunes Plus Although they have not made an official announcement yet, Apple has quietly dropped the price of their DRM-free iTunes Plus tracks from $1.29 USD to 99 cents.

The new price is equal to that of standard iTunes DRM crippled tracks.

It seems this latest move is in response to Amazon's DRM-free music store launch in which the tracks are sold for 89 to 99 cents a piece.

The official announcement is expected tomorrow in which Apple is expected to add to their DRM-free offering with music from independent labels while announcing the price drop.

Source:
BetaNews


Permalink to this article | Topic:

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • Pepsi and Amazon to give away DRM free music (1 December 2007)
  • UK retailers losing sales battle to DRM (23 November 2007)
  • New RCRD LBL gives away MP3s (16 November 2007)
  • Consumers show preference for ditching DRM (11 November 2007)
  • Latest Die Hard DVD to include a portable copy (16 October 2007)
  • Do DRM free downloads mean innovation in online music? (15 October 2007)
  • Authorized downloads rise by 80 percent in UK (13 October 2007)
  • Vivendi CEO calls iTunes pricing indecent (26 September 2007)
  • Amazon opens its DRM-free music store (25 September 2007)
  • DRM provider says the technology isn't being used correctly (20 September 2007)
  • Universal considering music subscription model (15 September 2007)
  • Apple DRM attacked as anti-comptetitive in Florida lawsuit (7 September 2007)
  • Wal-Mart hopes to gain market share by losing DRM (21 August 2007)
  • Universal snubs iTunes for DRM free downloads (11 August 2007)
  • Many UK music downloaders consider DRM a nuisance (7 August 2007)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    BBC Trust says there will be an iPlayer for all platforms
    Next news article »
    Increased North American and European LCD TV production coming soon
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    sk8flawzz (Member) 16 October 2007 18:57 Send private message to this user   
    good..
    seems like drm-free music is finally starting to take off..
    and itunes offering it at 99 cents could mean price drops from competitors =]
    Blackjax (Member) 17 October 2007 0:11 Send private message to this user   
    A move in the right direction, yes, now if they would just do it with movies and drop the price a bit. Of course the fact still remains that these companies will always try to blame low sales numbers on piracy. The exec's either don't know or more likely don't care that they put out steaming piles of dung 97% of the time.

    Ask yourself this question when was the last time you were willing to pay $10 to see a movie the second time in the theater or pay $15-$20 for a cd or dvd. I bet it's not more than once or twice in the past ten years. I don't even go the to the movies unless it's something made by pixar for my kids. and that's likely to change since they were "aquired".
    hermes_vb (Senior Member) 20 October 2007 0:49 Send private message to this user   
    Looks promising but I'm only gonna buy a few of them. Just the singles that I like. I still think that if you like the whole album, you should buy it from a music club. I can get them as cheap as $7. That's less than an iTunes album.
    Mez (Senior Member) 22 October 2007 9:45 Send private message to this user   
    ditto, Blackjax. I do not think I have ever seen the same movie twice in the theater in the last 50 years. I rarely see movies in the first run because they are mostly garbage. I am not going to pay $50 to see garbage! I only buy DVDs if I think the price is fair. It used to be $10 now it is $5. This whole thing is about cost verses value.

    How can they figure $1 a tune is a fair price for something that is 40 years old and originally was sold 12 for $2? They still made profit after making an expensive record than sharing half with a re-seller. The audio quality was better than that on a CD. Now, after milking the tunes for 40 years they want to charge $1 a tune. That is the biggest crime of all! They want the world to believe they would be losing money to sell it for less. They claim they are protecting the artists. Back them many artists got a flat fee with no percentage. I would feel a bit different if the artists were actually getting most of the royalties instead of little to none.
    borhan9 (AfterDawn Addict) 23 October 2007 8:08 Send private message to this user   
    Wise move their by apple. :)
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums | DVD X Copy Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi | fin.MP3Lizard.com
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2008 by AfterDawn Ltd.