User User name Password  
   
Thursday 24.7.2008 / 09:44 AM
Search:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > mp accuses bbc head of illegally favoring microsoft
Show topics
News
News

MP accuses BBC head of illegally favoring Microsoft

14 January 2008 11:08 by Rich "vurbal" Fiscus | 4 comments

MP accuses BBC head of illegally favoring Microsoft Last Wednesday, at a House of Commons hearing regarding procurement, Liberal Democrat John Pugh was critical of the BBC's Director General over the decision to support Windows and Internet Explorer exclusively in the initial release of the iPlayer. The iPlayer is intended to allow U.K. residents the ability to download recent programs to view for a limited time. They also offer a Streaming player that uses Flash technology, making it compatible with other operating systems and browsers.

Thompson defended the iPlayer program saying "All the feedback we've had is that consumers are enormously enjoying using iPlayer. About a million people in this country have tried it already."

But Pugh apparently wasn't satisfied with what he heard. He followed up his questioning with a scathing letter to Thompson that has been published by The Register, including the following passage.

The more fundamental issue is its failure to apply open standards and be sufficiently interoperable to work fully (stream and download) on more than one platform. The BBC is funded by licence players not all of whom have or choose to use a computer running Windows XP or Vista. By guaranteeing full functionality to the products of one software vendor it is as a public body handing a commercial advantage to that company - effectively illegal state aid! The aspiration to eventually (you said within two years) remove this advantage - does not rebut this charge. A promise of amendment is never sufficient excuse for past sins or indeed much of an explanation.

Most major web based developments of any scale these days work on the presumption that interoperablity, open standards, and platform neutrality are givens. It is not clear why the BBC design brief did not specify these requirements or if it did what technical problems - given the expertise available - hinder them being implemented.

So long as the iPlayer is bundled in with Windows/Internet Explorer it continues to run the risk of breaching state aid rules - as the benefits it thereby bestows on Microsoft (with their somewhat blemished reputation for fair competition) come via the deployment of the public’s licence money. What might be a pragmatic choice for a privately funded company becomes deeply problematic for a public corporation.


You can read the letter in its entirety on The Register's website.

Source: The Register

Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • Vista SP1 update coming tomorrow (17 March 2008)
  • iPlayer coming for iPhone, iPod Touch (6 March 2008)
  • BBC adds Firefox support to the iPlayer (2 February 2008)
  • MySpace video to feature BBC video clips (24 January 2008)
  • iPlayer coming to revamped Apple TV? (20 January 2008)
  • Jango hits new milestone (15 January 2008)
  • BBC iPlayer traffic increases 14-fold in a month (12 January 2008)
  • Microsoft experiences Xbox Live problems over holidays (4 January 2008)
  • BBC iPlayer officially launches (25 December 2007)
  • Flash based iPlayer alternative now available (15 December 2007)
  • BBC Trust says there will be an iPlayer for all platforms (16 October 2007)
  • NBC will offer downloadable TV shows (20 September 2007)
  • BBC's iPlayer fuels criticism from open source advocates (16 September 2007)
  • IPTV is the hot topic at IBC 2007 (11 September 2007)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    Netflix Watch Instantly no longer works with older Windows MCE versions
    Next news article »
    Toshiba slashes HD DVD player prices
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 14 January 2008 16:46 Send private message to this user   
    then the MP should fund Iplayer more and let them dev for over OS's and browsers....
    plazma247 (Newbie) 19 January 2008 10:41 Send private message to this user   
    zippy chap, the BBC gets subsidized by the TV licence we pay in the uk, so effectivly they are getting paid (given) money to develope it anyway.

    Basically for the sake of a DMR system that didnt work, which I and many other people 2 showed to be flawed, in some earlier post in the year.

    Strangely since it also became flash based:

    http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/12516.cfm

    Traffic has been up four fold......

    Really im not mad at the BBC for sticking with the microsoft DRM system as long as they did, as pre all of this drm was pretty hot... however the wind of drm turned at the right time.

    Im just glad that someone saw some sense that there was no point implimenting a DRM system that was flawed, could be cracked and locking to one older os when if someone was ever seriously going to steal content from a tv show they would go after a dvb feed which was far better quality and uncrypted.

    I must say since its flash re-launch its really good, i prefer the bbc iplayer to the 4OD service anyday.

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 19 January 2008 13:09

    ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 19 January 2008 12:57 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by plazma247:
    zippy chap, the BBC gets subsidized by the TV licence we pay in the uk, so effectivly they are getting paid (given) money to develope it anyway.

    Basically for the sake of a DMR system that didnt work, which I and many other people 2 be flawed, in some earlier post in the year they were tying it to windows xp for no reason.

    Strangely since it also became flash based:

    http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/12516.cfm

    Traffic has been up four fold......

    Really im not mad at the BBC for sticking with the microsoft DRM system as long as they did, as pre all of this drm was pretty hot... however the wind of drm turned at the right time.

    Im just glad that someone saw some sense that there was no point implimenting a DRM system that was flawed, could be cracked and locking to one older os when if someone was ever seriously going to steal content from a tv show they would go after a dvb feed which was far better quality and uncrypted.

    I must say since its flash re-launch its really good, i prefer the bbc iplayer to the 4OD service anyday.

    2 rules for goverment is either underfunded or mishandled :P
    borhan9 (AfterDawn Addict) 27 January 2008 18:01 Send private message to this user   
    It's all about Dollars and Cents.
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums | DVD X Copy Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi | fin.MP3Lizard.com
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2008 by AfterDawn Ltd.