Stupid. If it didn't interfere, why say it did? Just gives you bad credit when people later find out what you said was just a big fat lie.

I would like to see where this goes. It theoretically makes wifi internet available everywhere, but will it be free or paid for is the question.

Originally posted by WierdName:

---

Stupid. If it didn't interfere, why say it did? Just gives you bad credit when people later find out what you said was just a big fat lie.

---

Did you actually read the article?

Originally posted by 21Q:

---

I would like to see where this goes. It theoretically makes wifi internet available everywhere, but will it be free or paid for is the question.

---

i'll bet on paid

If this frequency were to culminate, it would be great if it provided a free broadcast for service providers. This would translate into cheap internet access without having to pay an additional connection service charge for all consumers. Most laptops have internal wifi modems but cannot use them everywhere only at hotspots and home networks. Nextel provides broadband internet but you have to buy the add on modem card. Why would I need to buy that card if my laptop already has a wireless modem? I don’t what to be restricted to just my home network or have to deal with others at a café looking for a place to sit and recharge my battery. I hope the FCC does approve this new technology.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by WierdName:

---

Stupid. If it didn't interfere, why say it did? Just gives you bad credit when people later find out what you said was just a big fat lie.

---

Did you actually read the article?

---

I was referring to the NAB report.

I don't get why this white space is such a big deal.