User User name Password  
   
Wednesday 9.7.2008 / 07:36 AM
Search:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > radiohead lets fans remix single
Show topics
News
News

Radiohead lets fans remix single

2 April 2008 18:45 by James "Dela" Delahunty | 3 comments

Radiohead lets fans remix single Radiohead is once again reaching out to fans on the Internet after using it to make the band's latest album "In Rainbows" a chart-topping success. Last year, Radiohead released the album for download on its website and let users decide what they wanted to pay for it. Now, the UK rock act has teamed up with iTunes and GarageBand for an interactive project that involves the fans again.

Specifically, Radiohead is allowing fans to rework the the album's second single, "Nude." Five separate tracks are available from iTunes Plus; bass, voice, guitar, strings/effects and drums. Those who attain all five will be sent an access code to complete the task via the GarageBand or Logic music production software.

Finished mixes can be uploaded to Radioheadremix.com, where fans have until May 1 to listen and vote for their favorite. Earlier this year, the CD version of "In Rainbows" was released, debuting at No. 1 on the U.S. and UK charts.


Get regular news updates from AfterDawn.com by subscribing to our RSS feeds using the Subscribe button below. If you have been living in a cave for a few years now and don't know how to use RSS feeds, then Click Here to read a Guide on how to use RSS (and other) feeds.

Permalink to this article | Topics:

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • Beatles music headed to Guitar Hero, Rock Band? (23 June 2008)
  • Radiohead agrees to let iTunes sell individual tracks from EMI years (4 June 2008)
  • Radiohead and Prince in fight over copyright (1 June 2008)
  • Radiohead leaves "pay-as-you-please" model (3 May 2008)
  • Amazon MP3 is having no effect on iTunes, says NPD (15 April 2008)
  • Radiohead's new CD becomes #1 hit despite free downloads (9 January 2008)
  • Radiohead download revenue hotly debated (12 November 2007)
  • Radiohead denies iTunes of their new album (1 October 2007)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    Ringleader in £5 million counterfeiting scam gets sentenced
    Next news article »
    72 percent of the US is playing video games, says study
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    PeaInAPod (AfterDawn Addict) 2 April 2008 22:49 Send private message to this user   
    Radioheads good but I hate hwo there getting all this publicity for being "the" band that went independent. There still with there music label for goodness sake! All they did was release it digitally ahead of the retail release. The group that should be getting all this attention is Nine Inch Nails. They are totally independent, they have helped more artists branch out online, and they also let users remix there music. And not just a single but the entire CD, Ghosts I,II,III, & IV have a extra CD with all the tracks from the original recordings saved as lossless .WAV files.
    snowlock (Junior Member) 2 April 2008 23:57 Send private message to this user   
    yeah, trent reznor really did a better job of the whole digital distribution;
    just like with the radiohead disc, he let fans pay what they wanted for it,
    except he also offered some sort of limited edition set for a huge upcharge.
    he made all the profits he could usually make traditionally distributing the discs
    just from the sales of the limited edition sets, which sold out in a flash.

    whoever you chose to see as the pioneers of mainstream digital distribution,
    they've proven that it is a highly effective way to sell their music.
    these artists have paved the way, all that is left is for other big names to follow.

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 2 April 2008 23:59

    ExogenBoy (Newbie) 3 April 2008 2:57 Send private message to this user   
    I can certainly see a pattern in what they are doing/studying here:

    In Rainbows: What is the amount of money people are willing to pay voluntarily for a record? (~ What is the the "true" value of a piece of popular music.)

    The mix; what is the smallest piece of popular music to be sold for a price (if lycky, for a profit)?

    (Popular music referring to their global sales/success rather to what they sound like...)

    The motif is clearly more econometric than liberal.
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums | DVD X Copy Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi | fin.MP3Lizard.com
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2008 by AfterDawn Ltd.