User User name Password  
   
Sunday 29.11.2009 / 07:14 AM
Search AfterDawn.com:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > western digital introduces the first 2tb hard drive
Show topics
News
News

Western Digital introduces the first 2TB hard drive

27 January 2009 13:12 by Rich "vurbal" Fiscus | 34 comments

Western Digital introduces the first 2TB hard drive Western Digital has just announced a new SATA II hard drive with a whopping 2TB (2 trillion Byte) capacity. The company says not only is it bigger than other hard drives on the market, but it also uses less power.

"With the launch of the new WD Caviar Green 2 TB hard drive, customers receive the additional capacities needed to operate today's highly advanced programs and high-resolution digital files while using less power than typical drives with similar performance and capacities," said Western Digital senior vice president Jim Morris

According to the company's website, power usage of the highest capacity Caviar Green is just barely better than previous models (Caviar Blue and Caviar Black) during Read/Write operations. Where it really seems to shine is when it's idle. While earlier models use nearly the same power whether they're doing anything or not, the Caviar Green's power drops by nearly half.

When comparing Caviar Green hard drives with similar specs to their Caviar Blue and Black predecessors the difference is much more pronounced. According to the website a 1TB Caviar Green drive with 16MB of cache uses about 64% as much power as a comparable Caviar Black. When idle it uses just 36% as much power.

Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • Western Digital releases first 1 TB notebook hard drive (27 July 2009)
  • PSP 2 will be touchscreen? (27 January 2009)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    Internet Explorer 8 RC 1 available for download now
    Next news article »
    Microsoft speaks out about Zune revenue loss
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article!  There are more user comments available, read them here
    ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 27 January 2009 18:26 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by ThePastor:
    Overpriced for now... but I assume this means that the 1TB drives will drop in price.
    1TB for less than $100 seems to be a good pricepoint... :D

    I just got 750GB for like $85, a month or two ago.

    I got a 1TB drive for 89+12 shipping a month ago.
    its a WD :X
    rvinkebob (Member) 27 January 2009 19:07 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by ZippyDSM:
    So whats the usable space 18XXX-19XXGB?
    2000000000000 bytes = about 1863GB

    KB to MB Converter


    Pop_Smith (Senior Member) 27 January 2009 19:13 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by ZippyDSM:
    So whats the usable space 18XXX-19XXGB?
    Based on a little fun with the Google Calculator it is only 1.78TB.

    I typed in 2,000,000,000,000 Bytes / 1024 and it spat out 1.77635684 terabytes, which is roughly 1.78TB or only 1,780GB.

    Getting ripped off 220GB (that's the size of my old PCs entire drive!) sucks. Curse Microsoft for having a TB as 1,024GB.
    rvinkebob (Member) 27 January 2009 19:18 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by Pop_Smith:
    Based on a little fun with the Google Calculator it is only 1.78TB.

    I typed in 2,000,000,000,000 Bytes / 1024 and it spat out 1.77635684 terabytes, which is roughly 1.78TB or only 1,780GB.

    Getting ripped off 220GB (that's the size of my old PCs entire drive!) sucks. Curse Microsoft for having a TB as 1,024GB.
    How did it come out as 1780GB? 2,000,000,000,000 / 1024 = 1953125000KB; 1953125000 / 1024 = 1907349MB; 1907349 / 1024 = 1863GB.


    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 27 January 2009 19:19

    ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 27 January 2009 19:19 Send private message to this user   
    thanks guys I just figure 15% of usable space.

    Its not bad but annoying sometimes ><

    Fallout 3 has stole my soul, for about 30 hours till the paint wore off.... even if its a action focused FPS RPG, at least its a FPS RPG not a under deved shooter like Bioshock!
    rvinkebob (Member) 27 January 2009 19:21 Send private message to this user   
    Yeah, but it'll go a long way when we start getting to 8TB HDD's :P

    I figure a 2TB HDD will fit 10 years worth of files, for me anyway.


    ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 27 January 2009 19:23 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by rvinkebob:
    Yeah, but it'll go a long way when we start getting to 8TB HDD's :P

    I figure a 2TB HDD will fit 10 years worth of files, for me anyway.
    I already haz 1.5TB of anime ;_; I only haz 700GB left I is running out of roooommmmm >>

    Fallout 3 has stole my soul, for about 30 hours till the paint wore off.... even if its a action focused FPS RPG, at least its a FPS RPG not a under deved shooter like Bioshock!
    dragnandy (Senior Member) 27 January 2009 19:29 Send private message to this user   
    how much is this going to cost? around 300USD? i definitely want in. i recently bought a 500gb for like 80USD. wow!
    Pop_Smith (Senior Member) 27 January 2009 20:06 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by rvinkebob:
    How did it come out as 1780GB? 2,000,000,000,000 / 1024 = 1953125000KB; 1953125000 / 1024 = 1907349MB; 1907349 / 1024 = 1863GB.
    Yes, you are correct. I questioned it personally when what I typed was shown but I figured someone would just correct me. >.<

    I actually think Google's Calculator whacked. It gives me different figures based on if I put "bytes" at the end of the number or not.

    Here is exactly what it said:

    2 000 000 000 000 000 Bytes / 1024 = 1.77635684 terabytes.

    If I remove the word "bytes" it spits out what you got:

    2 000 000 000 000 000 / 1 024 = 1 953 125 000 000

    That is pretty strange and yet funny in my opinion.

    EDITED by Pop_Smith: Removed my personal quote. :P

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 27 January 2009 20:07

    windsong (Junior Member) 27 January 2009 23:16 Send private message to this user   
    WD needs to stop dragging their heels and give SS drives a price reduction. They keep churning out CRAP drives with moving parts that dont last 2 months let alone 2 years. You drop it..and its BROKE.
    ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 27 January 2009 23:18 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by windsong:
    WD needs to stop dragging their heels and give SS drives a price reduction. They keep churning out CRAP drives with moving parts that dont last 2 months let alone 2 years. You drop it..and its BROKE.
    ss drives still have a write limit right?
    Buik (Member) 27 January 2009 23:39 Send private message to this user   
    1TB drives have already been available for under $100 US. Got one a few months ago from NewEgg. It is a WD Green model (OEM) Not a problem. Plugged it into A usb/sata Docking Station, and it has been a work horse for several months. Hope to get it filled up soon so I can justify my next purchase.
    ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 27 January 2009 23:42 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by Buik:
    1TB drives have already been available for under $100 US. Got one a few months ago from NewEgg. It is a WD Green model (OEM) Not a problem. Plugged it into A usb/sata Docking Station, and it has been a work horse for several months. Hope to get it filled up soon so I can justify my next purchase.
    Don;t say that I have 400GB left on mine >>
    I need a 50pack of DL discs more than I need a new 80$ 1TB drive >>
    I also need a new PSU >>
    EricCarr (Member) 28 January 2009 4:09 Send private message to this user   
    If you buy an enclosure for this 2TB. You will have an external drive.
    Gplanet (Newbie) 28 January 2009 5:33 Send private message to this user   
    I have 3 1TB hard drives and looking forward to a 2TB
    nonoitall (Member) 28 January 2009 6:54 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by Pop_Smith:
    Curse Microsoft for having a TB as 1,024GB.

    Actually, 1024 is pretty universal among most operating systems (not just Windows) as a multiplier, so it would be more useful to curse hard drive manufacturers for being the sticklers who use 1000 as a base. ;-)

    Just figure it's 2 trillion (ahem, trillion, not billion) bytes as opposed to 2 TiB. And always use binary units (KiB, MiB, GiB, TiB, etc.) when you want to avoid ambiguity.
    ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 28 January 2009 10:59 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    Originally posted by Pop_Smith:
    Curse Microsoft for having a TB as 1,024GB.

    Actually, 1024 is pretty universal among most operating systems (not just Windows) as a multiplier, so it would be more useful to curse hard drive manufacturers for being the sticklers who use 1000 as a base. ;-)

    Just figure it's 2 trillion (ahem, trillion, not billion) bytes as opposed to 2 TiB. And always use binary units (KiB, MiB, GiB, TiB, etc.) when you want to avoid ambiguity.

    or knock 12-15% off and move on with your life :P
    ZOMG! numbers!!!?!?!? wut? 0_o
    cmcjk (Newbie) 28 January 2009 11:58 Send private message to this user   
    "Actually, 1024 is pretty universal among most operating systems"

    I thought it was universal with all OS's. 1024 comes from the fact that they are based on binary and not a decimal system. 10 to the power of 3 = 1000, 2 to the power of 10 = 1024. Using 2TB = 2,000,000,000,000 bytes is just a way to push the numbers up for the ignorant.

    FYI 2,000,000,000,000 is 1 "billion" in the long number system and 1 "trillion" in the short system. Most people now use the short system.
    nonoitall (Member) 28 January 2009 15:21 Send private message to this user   
    IDK, I haven't checked them all, so I didn't want to say that, but suffice it to say that most computers use binary units as opposed to decimal ones. :-D

    Interesting tidbit about the long vs. short numbering, too. Now that you mention it, I seem to remember hearing about that at some point, but it's since slipped my mind.
    wdtv (Newbie) 30 January 2009 10:20 Send private message to this user   
    I got a 1.5 TB Seagate External Hard drive. It's not bad, a little slow though. Paid $155 for it online. Great for my Wdtv.

    Oh but what really gets me ticked is you have 1.5 tb, and then look at the properties, you only really have 1.3 tb.

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 30 January 2009 10:22

    ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 30 January 2009 13:21 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by wdtv:
    I got a 1.5 TB Seagate External Hard drive. It's not bad, a little slow though. Paid $155 for it online. Great for my Wdtv.

    Oh but what really gets me ticked is you have 1.5 tb, and then look at the properties, you only really have 1.3 tb.
    You paid to much,seagate sucks and 1.5 HD has issues........
    mukhis (Newbie) 9 February 2009 13:07 Send private message to this user   
    seagate 1.5 TB is not as bad as some people are saying (mostly without having it, just after reading reviews). i have two since blackfriday, both are working w/o trouble.
    ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 9 February 2009 13:09 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by mukhis:
    seagate 1.5 TB is not as bad as some people are saying (mostly without having it, just after reading reviews). i have two since blackfriday, both are working w/o trouble.
    Still would not trust or pay much for the SG brand its just not what it use to be.
    mukhis (Newbie) 9 February 2009 13:17 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    Still would not trust or pay much for the SG brand its just not what it use to be.

    i paid $103 ea (after live cashback, shipping and tax), not bad i think, after all, 5 yr warranty for peace of mind. right now, all good HDDs are almost equally priced, so no complaints from my part.
    ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 9 February 2009 13:21 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Still would not trust or pay much for the SG brand its just not what it use to be.

    i paid $103 ea (after live cashback, shipping and tax), not bad i think, after all, 5 yr warranty for peace of mind. right now, all good HDDs are almost equally priced, so no complaints from my part.

    I could get a 1.5TB for 120 for 3 or 4 months now I chose to get a 89$ WD 1TB because I'd rather not get a SG drive.
    mukhis (Newbie) 9 February 2009 13:28 Send private message to this user   
    your choice, but i still trust SG, WD, hitachi, samsung equally.

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 9 February 2009 13:58

     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2009 by AfterDawn Ltd.