User User name Password  
   
Tuesday 24.11.2009 / 02:02 AM
Search AfterDawn.com:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > pirate bay lawyer files for retrial, alleging bias
Show topics
News
News

Pirate Bay lawyer files for retrial, alleging bias

27 April 2009 14:23 by James "Dela" Delahunty | 4 comments

Pirate Bay lawyer files for retrial, alleging bias The four men sentenced to a year in prison and fined $3.6 million after being found guilty of assisting copyright infringement should be given a new trial because the Judge was biased, a court heard on Monday. The lawyer for Carl Lundstrom, one of the four founders of the Pirate Bay BitTorrent tracker, said that Judge Tomas Norstrom's affiliation with groups for copyright protection should have disqualified him.

"Tomas Norstrom was biased during the trial ... Secondly, he neglected to inform the defendants and their lawyers of the facts that constituted the bias," defense lawyer Per Samuelson said in the document, obtained by Reuters. The court of appeal now must decide whether to send the case back to District Court.

Judge Norstrom is a member of The Swedish Association for Copyright and a board member of the Swedish Association for the Protection of Industrial Property. Peter Danowsky, A board member of The Swedish Association for Copyright, represented the film and music industries in the trial. Lundstrom's lawyer last week filed an appeal, asking the court of appeal to change the verdict and dismiss the prosecution and the claims for compensation.

He also said the court should turn to the European court of justice (ECJ) for a preliminary ruling.

Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • Swedish court says Pirate Bay judge not biased (12 June 2009)
  • The Pirate Bay now has their own 'anthem' (18 May 2009)
  • Hong Kong makes third BitTorrent arrest (29 April 2009)
  • Danish Pirate Bay block will go to Supreme Court (26 April 2009)
  • Swedish movie industry group threatens torrent trackers (24 April 2009)
  • Pirate Bay judge faces conflict of interest allegation (23 April 2009)
  • BT blocks Pirate Bay as part of self-regulation scheme (21 April 2009)
  • Torrent trackers close to avoid Pirate Bay's fate (21 April 2009)
  • Copyright lobby targets "Pirate Bay for textbooks" (21 April 2009)
  • The ESA are fans of Pirate Bay decision (20 April 2009)
  • Pirate Bay founders file official appeal (20 April 2009)
  • IFPI.org takes a hit from DDoS attack (20 April 2009)
  • Following Pirate Bay verdict, Pirate Party gets 3000 new members in 7 hours (18 April 2009)
  • Sweden's Pirate Party condemns Pirate Bay verdict as 'gross injustice' (17 April 2009)
  • Pirate Bay guilty verdict - Some reactions from music & movie bodies (17 April 2009)
  • Pirate Bay server to be placed in Swedish museum (17 April 2009)
  • Judge delivers guilty verdict in Pirate Bay trial - watch video (17 April 2009)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    ASUS USB TV tuner includes 4GB storage
    Next news article »
    Samsung shows off first Android phone
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    platdream (Newbie) 27 April 2009 23:36 Send private message to this user   
    i knew it..they just cannot simply say like they are guilty.
    as one said earlier just because some guys use cars for speeding u cannot just sentence the car company owner for 1 yr n some fine..
    the guilty is the user but not the car company owner.
    piratebay rules....
    or atleast these loosers should make one service like this without being used illegally n then file a case against TPB...
    duperfly (Newbie) 28 April 2009 21:05 Send private message to this user   
    people have been able to sue the gun makers because some person killed someone! but your right platdream, guns don't kill people, cars don't speed by them selfs, and pirated movies aren't distributed by PIRATE BAY. all they did was set up a website, and random people distributed them!

    I sure will miss it though.... if I get arrested by saying that, I'm going to sue afterdawn!! just joking!!! don't kick me afterdawn! I love it here!!!!!!
    djgizmo (Junior Member) 29 April 2009 0:02 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by duperfly:
    all they did was set up a website, and random people distributed them!

    Luckily, its currently not against the law to ENABLE someone to copyright infringe. Fact, they ENABLE users to do what they do. The problem with changing laws to include companies like TPB is that it would also include companies like Yahoo, Google, and MS (for Live search).
    rrrev (Inactive) 1 May 2009 10:38 Send private message to this user   
    *,the lot of em.

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 9 May 2009 16:05

     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2009 by AfterDawn Ltd.