|
19 November 2002 14:17 by Lasse "cd-rw.org" Penttinen
| 2 comments
I am sure that many of you have read articles about CD-Rs exploding at ultra-high speeds. As Maxell introduces their 48x, they also give a statement about 52x being too high - it's too risky with minimal benefits. Recently CD-R drive manufacturer Plextor gave similar opinions on the maximum CD-R speed.
With its 48X product introduction, Maxell is joining with other CD industry leaders such as Sony, Yamaha and Plextor in adopting 48X as the new high-speed standard, as opposed to the 52X benchmark, because of reliability concerns at the higher speed. Maxell engineers determined that the minimal speed advantage offered by 52X drives is outweighed by the performance and safety issues of operating CD-R media in excess of 10,000 rpm. Research has shown that naturally occurring minute defects or cracks in the CD-R hub area can quickly expand when exposed to the physical stresses of 52X operations. These small, virtually undetectable defects can easily cause discs to break apart at 52X speed, destroying not only critical data stored on the CD-R media, but potentially damaging or destroying the CD drive.
"The 48X standard offers customers outstanding performance without the risks associated with 52X speeds," said Dawn Wortman, senior marketing manager at Maxell. "Our 48X media is the latest example of Maxell's commitment to increasing customer value with continual leading-edge product enhancements for CD-R, DVD and mid-range tape applications, while maintaining the utmost in reliability."
Biz.Yahoo.com
Permalink to this article
| |
Related articles:
More about CDs exploding in highspeed drives (18 August 2002)
|
|
|
| Discuss this article! |
| wonderboy (Inactive) 20 November 2002 20:13 |
|
|
thats bull I bought the new memorex not(maxell)52X cd burner and I do admit that I have only burned 5 cds at that speed all of those cd's worked...fine I just wouldnt want to put cheap cd-r/rw media in it....
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 20 November 2002 20:31
|
| bang (Junior Member) 5 December 2002 20:51 |
|
|
48X, that means a disk in 2 minutes? But then again what else (other than the burner you burnt it with) will beable to read it? I still burn some times as slow as 4X so as to make sure the disk is properly copied (especially audio disks).
|
|
|
Latest newsLatest news from AfterDawn.com. Xbox Live lawsuit near conclusion? 3 Jul, 2009 | 8 comments New GTA IV DLC episodes coming in 2010 3 Jul, 2009 | 2 comments Jammie Rasset-Thomas to appeal damage award 2 Jul, 2009 UK sees strong decline in DVD sales 2 Jul, 2009 | 3 comments PS3 Slim ready to ship in July? 2 Jul, 2009 | 5 comments HTML 5 standard won't have an official video codec 2 Jul, 2009 | 1 comment Usenet.com loses case to RIAA 2 Jul, 2009 | 6 comments The Pirate Bay adds 'user deletion' 30 Jun, 2009 | 21 comments Palm Pre selling well 30 Jun, 2009 Sony to bring backwards compatibility back to PS3? 30 Jun, 2009 | 21 comments Flash headed to Android phones soon 30 Jun, 2009 | 2 comments New Firefox, Nero now available 30 Jun, 2009 | 3 comments
More news... 
Search for headlinesSearch through our news archive. 
Latest threadsRecently updated discussion threads. More... 
Last week's most popular software downloads
Most popular devicesLast week's most popular products in our product comparison service. More products... 
Top linksMost popular links - Blasteroids.com
Download game trailers, demos and more - TorrentReactor.Net
The most active torrents on the web - Digital-Digest
Latest DivX, XviD, DVD, Blu-Ray, HD DVD News - OpenSubtitles.org
download DivX subtitles from the biggest open database - CDRInfo.com
The Hardware Authority - DVDHelp.us
DVD help, tutorials, FAQ, and very popular free help forum! - Torrentreactor.TO
The most active torrents on the web - dvd ripper
rip DVD to VCD, DivX, MPEG, SVCD, AVI easily and quickly.

|