User User name Password  
   
Sunday 8.11.2009 / 07:26 AM
Search AfterDawn.com:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > judge delays his decision on fasttrack p2p case
Show topics
News
News

Judge delays his decision on FastTrack P2P case

3 December 2002 2:50 by Petteri "dRD" Pyyny | 3 comments

Judge delays his decision on FastTrack P2P case In a surprise move, federal court Judge Stephen Wilson, delayed his decision on FastTrack P2P case where both parties -- RIAA and MPAA and two of the FastTrack P2P software vendors, Grokster and Streamcast (owner of the Morpheus) -- are seeking for summary judgment motions before the case goes to an actual trial.

The third FastTrack company, Sharman Networks, the owner of the Kazaa and the owner of the FastTrack technology, didn't attend to the court hearing, because the court still has to decide whether the U.S. court has jurisdiction over the company or not. Sharman Networks has headquarters at Australia, is incorporated in small island of Vanuatu and doesn't have any servers in the U.S. soil.

Basically in the hearing both parties referred to a famous P2P case of Napster -- copyright owners' lawyers stating that FastTrack operators are identical to that of Napster and "FastTrack companies" arguing that because they don't operate any central servers (unlike Napster did), the Napster ruling doesn't apply to them.

Judge basically stated after the hearing that he is not ready to issue summary judgments at this point and needed more time to determine if the case should go to trial or not. Also, he probably needs time to determine whether or not the Sharman Networks should be included to the case.

More info:

Houston Chronicle
Yahoo!

(please note, most of the external articles confuse Grokster and Kazaa happily in their articles, so ignore those parts -- at least we've got the facts correct ;-)


Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • P2P vs. RIAA debate (7 July 2003)
  • Kazaa can be sued in States (13 January 2003)
  • Can Kazaa be sued in the States? (22 November 2002)
  • RIAA and MPAA seek ruling in P2P case (14 September 2002)
  • KaZaA's new owner gets sued as well (9 July 2002)
  • KaZaA goes to court -- again (21 May 2002)
  • Dutch appeals court: KaZaA is legal (28 March 2002)
  • Morpheus, Grokster & KaZaA trial begins (5 March 2002)
  • KaZaA sold to an Australian company (22 January 2002)
  • KaZaa suspends downloads (17 January 2002)
  • Kazaa continues to operate despite the court decision (20 December 2001)
  • Dutch judge orders Kazaa to shut down (29 November 2001)
  • EFF to defend MusicCity (7 November 2001)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    Last week's charts
    Next news article »
    New CDRInfo.com reviews: INcoder INC-TS24C-C1, MSI MS-8152 CD-ROM
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    seanbyrne (Member) 3 December 2002 3:44 Send private message to this user   
    I've occasionally run Kazaa_lite at college where it displayed something between 5 - 12 users online. It was days where there the college had problems with its internet connection. Any searches I had done returned very few results or 'No matches found' instantly, meaning that what ever nodes it was connected to and searched had to be local. Later on, the number of users online suddenly shot back up to several million.

    After seeing the above likely means that Kazaa is a decentralised network. I'd be interested on how it finds out the IP addresses of its peers. ;-)
    dRD (I hate titles) 3 December 2002 5:50 Send private message to this user   
    FastTrack's technology has been documented pretty well over the years and if I recall correctly, the client itself includes huge list of "supernodes" IP addresses that it first tries to connect to in order to retrieve the list of other supernodes from the supernode it managed to connect to and then gets the connection across the P2P network up and running. Supernodes are simply users who have enough bandwidth and fast enough computer to act simultaneously as a client and a server and those supernodes are being assigned "on the fly" by the software itself unless you check the box "don't act as supernode" off from your Kazaa/Grokster settings.

    Petteri Pyyny
    Webmaster
    http://AfterDawn.com/

    Please read our guides before posting questions! Guides are available here:
    http://www.afterdawn.com/articles/
    Ghostdog (Senior Member) 4 December 2002 5:30 Send private message to this user   
    Tricky case. These companies don´t stand by and watch when people swap illegal files, they don´t control the service liek Napster did. But they sort of help people brake the law by providing them with the means to do so, the application itself.

    The united states cannot sue Sharman networks, aren´t involved with the US.

    This will be a even harder decission then with the Napster-case.
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2009 by AfterDawn Ltd.