| Discuss this article! |
| Toiletman (Senior Member) 18 October 2004 11:44 |
|
Quite surprising... I have always used .mp3 myself, and if MP3 is slowly declining, then I guess MP3 Players will soon be AAC Players.
|
| gort9k (Junior Member) 18 October 2004 11:46 |
|
|
I'd say bullsh***.
As long as I know, everybody I talk to, are using mp3. Every now an then, mainly when you find people that are new comer to computing, you find them using what is bundled with Windows (wma), but as soon as they get a litle knoledge, they swith to mp3. The same goes with windows media player. Lots of folks ditched it in favour of Winamp.
|
| Pop_Smith (Senior Member) 18 October 2004 12:50 |
|
I believe that .mp3 will continute to be king.
Check this link out on how to encode PERFECT .mp3 files
(I did it with Queen and Styx, the lowest quality (compared to orignal) was 95%.)
http://www.sugarmegs.org/mp3encode.html
|
| Trakinas (Inactive) 18 October 2004 13:45 |
|
Strange.
I've always used MP3, and now, MP3 together with OGG. Never used WMA, nor even know somobody who uses WMA.
I will check for AAC - never used it too.
That's all
cheers
|
| OzMick (Senior Member) 18 October 2004 14:35 |
|
|
In the process of shifting to ogg myself too. If we want good, royalty free codecs we need people to get behind and support them.
Got a Rio Karma the other day for playing them on too, absolutely love it. Was worth jumping through all the hoops to get one imported into Australia. Plays ogg and looks SO much more manly than an iPod (not to mention the sound quality out of it is fantastic).
|
| DDRtist (Inactive) 18 October 2004 16:04 |
|
Both AAC and WMA have methods of being encrypted and can have DRM crap attached. I hate Microsoft's WMP7 and higher and I hate Apple's QuickTime 4 and higher. I also hate RealPlayer and always have. They are so stupid and all graphical and RAM-killing for NO REASON AT ALL.
How come Winamp is great? It's graphical yet not a RAM killer.
I use Media Player Classic + QuickTime Alternative + Real Alternative. Although not everything will play with those two, if they encode to crappy streaming formats, I just "Screw this. I don't need to watch it if they are going to encode to stupid formats. It's NOT worth installing a full QT or RP installation."
Most everyone I know is using MP3 or OGG or FLAC. But not formats that can be encrypted with DRM crap. So there. Screw you NPD Group's MusicWatch Digital, you're wrong, and there's no way you're getting onto my hard drive!
|
| djscoop (AfterDawn Addict) 18 October 2004 19:13 |
|
|
Who cares that the popularity of MP3s is slightly declining? As long as your know how to properly encode them, they sound great. There's no way any of the other formats will take over MP3 in the near future.
|
| Ghostdog (Senior Member) 19 October 2004 4:04 |
|
Huhm, maybe I should start using AAC. I´ve heard the acronym many many times reading the news section here on AD, but, strangely, I´ve never wondred about what can be achieved with the format. I´ve always thought of it as "another codec".
|
| nath_r_p (Newbie) 19 October 2004 6:27 |
|
I quote from the Glossary section: "... AAC produces better audio quality than MP3 using less physical space for the files...". But for some strange reasion I've still got all my music in MP3 format...
|
| strcruzer (Junior Member) 19 October 2004 8:51 |
|
Who do you think is really spreading this propaganda? RIAA I'd bet, they want DRM crap out there so they control our rights. I am not intersted in DRM crippled music either so WMA and Real and the like can go pound sand since I will never use them. I recently bought a new PC and I removed the bundled sh*t since I am not interested support the RIAA and idiot members. I go to IUMA.com and the like to DL music from the Artists directly and boycott the RIAA members.
|
| pandymen (Inactive) 20 October 2004 23:55 |
|
Wow, why all the hate. Its probably true. If you've ever used Itunes (which is really popular right now), you would find that it default compresses songs to AAC. With more and more people getting Ipods, thats more and more people using AAC compression software.
Besides, if you really care about your music you'd use something less lossy than mp3's.
|
| firewire (Junior Member) 21 October 2004 0:03 |
|
|
|
| Pop_Smith (Senior Member) 21 October 2004 13:23 |
|
|
|
| djscoop (AfterDawn Addict) 21 October 2004 13:48 |
|
|
Yeah man, enough with the itunes and ipod BS. real computer users use PCs, not PCs with MAC software. itunes has to be the sh*tiest mp3 player I've seen. But hey, it works for the MAC idiots
|
| pandymen (Inactive) 22 October 2004 4:23 |
|
|
Lol, Itunes isnt exactly the mp3 player, but ok. Nice flame.
Wow, if you've ever listened to several mp3 players to compare, you'd realize that sound quality depends mostly on headphones and the compression quality, not on the actual mp3 player.
|
| djscoop (AfterDawn Addict) 22 October 2004 9:57 |
|
|
I'm not saying itunes plays crappy quality, of course it depends on mp3 compression, your sound card, and your speakers. I'm just saying as far as setup, options, and flexibility goes, itunes doesn't compare to other ones, such as the infamous (and best) one, winamp.
|