User User name Password  
   
Sunday 8.11.2009 / 06:31 AM
Search AfterDawn.com:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > french consumer friendly drm legislation gutted
Show topics
News
News

French consumer friendly DRM legislation gutted

3 May 2006 16:54 by James "Dela" Delahunty | 5 comments

French consumer friendly DRM legislation gutted Consumer friendly French DRM legislation has been spoiled in committee, sending consumer groups up in arms. The legislation had originally included provisions that would have forced tech companies to make their Digital Rights Management technology interoperable (meaning copy protected music sold online should be playable on any MP3 player for example). This would have struck hard at Apple's iTunes and iPod combination, which has helped Apple dominate the music download and MP3 player markets.

Apple completely refuses to license its FairPlay digital rights management system to any other company, and why would it? Music bought from iTunes can only be played on an iPod or some Motorola phones, and music from other online music stores don't work on an iPod (if they are protected with Windows Media DRM for example). So it's a perfect combination and keeps millions of dollars flowing toward the company.

In the midst of the controversy surrounding the French legislation, it was rumored that Apple would pull iTunes from France completely to avoid opening FairPlay. The company trashed the legislation as "state sponsored piracy". However, many of the consumer-friendly provisions in the legislation have since been removed or rewritten. Here are some examples from Ars technica...

  • Previously, "information needed for interoperability" covered "technical documentation and programming interfaces needed to obtain a copy in an open standard of the copyrighted work, along with its legal information." Now this has been changed to "technical documentation and programming interfaces needed to obtain a protected copy of a copyrighted work." But a "protected" version of the work can't be played back in a different player, which means interoperability won't be attained with this clause.
  • Previously, the only condition for receiving information needed for interoperability was to meet the cost of logistics of delivering the information. Now, anyone wanting to build a player will have to take a license on "reasonable and non discriminatory conditions, and an appropriate fee." When using information attained under such a license, you will have to "respect the efficiency and integrity of the technical measure."
  • DRM publishers can demand the retraction of publication of the source-code for interoperable, independent software, if it can prove that the source-code is "harmful to the security and the efficiency of the DRM."

These new changes have still to be voted on, and consumer groups intend to fight against this one as hard as they can. stopdrm.info has called for a demonstration in the Place de la Bastille on May 7.

Source:
Ars technica


Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • French DRM law is 'unconstitutional' (1 August 2006)
  • DRM free MP3 music from Yahoo! Music (21 July 2006)
  • HDMI 1.3 upgrade published (22 June 2006)
  • BPI wants Apple to license FairPlay (7 June 2006)
  • Apple keeps tight grip on iTunes 99c price policy (4 May 2006)
  • P2P under debate again in France (7 March 2006)
  • French court ruled P2P legal for personal use (8 February 2006)
  • French court bans use of DRM on Warner Music CD (29 January 2006)
  • EMI boss condemns French move to legalise file sharing (22 January 2006)
  • French lawmakers support file sharing (22 December 2005)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    RIAA targeted street pirates in 12 cities
    Next news article »
    U.S. Senator tries to sneak 'Broadcast Flag' into law
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    Lethal_B (Moderator) 3 May 2006 17:16 Send private message to this user   
    I feel for the downloaders of these DRM-crippled, poorly encoded music files..
    PeaInAPod (AfterDawn Addict) 3 May 2006 19:44 Send private message to this user   
    If online music stores offered music tracks at a higher bitrate than the lowly 128kbps more people may actually stop downloading music off P2P networks and turn to the music stores.
    hot_ice (Senior Member) 4 May 2006 13:14 Send private message to this user   
    Buy the product in stores, problem solved.
    PeaInAPod (AfterDawn Addict) 4 May 2006 14:45 Send private message to this user   
    Yeah you could always buy it but then what happens if you buy one of sonys cd's?? Would you rather have DRM'ed files or rootkit infected files??
    Lethal_B (Moderator) 4 May 2006 14:53 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    Would you rather have DRM'ed files or rootkit infected files??
    Well, neither. However, if you look at the bigger picture, Sony's rootkit can be patched and addressed now, but once you have poorly encoded, DRM encrypted files, they are staying that way..

     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2009 by AfterDawn Ltd.