User User name Password  
   
Monday 9.11.2009 / 01:46 AM
Search AfterDawn.com:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > emi opts to keep drm
Show topics
News
News

EMI opts to keep DRM

26 February 2007 6:34 by James "Dela" Delahunty | 3 comments

EMI opts to keep DRM EMI, one of the world's big four major record companies, has opted to keep selling its music with Digital Rights Management (DRM) restrictions through online retailers. EMI is the smallest of the four majors and was tipped to be the most likely to sell DRM-free downloads on the Internet. As Apple CEO, Steve Jobs, pointed out, it is pointless to enforce restrictions on consumers of digital music when CDs are sold completely unprotected.

EMI axed its chairman and CEO Alain Levy in January and alone announced £110 million in cuts are needed this year. The company turned over £867 million in October, with a pre-tax profit of £18.6 million. Since sales of physical CDs have declined by up to 15% in recent years, record companies look at digital sales to fill the gap.

Unfortunately, digital sales have not filled up the gap for major labels, but have been successful for Independents. It was reported that EMI was considering selling DRM-free music through online retailers in exchange for large upfront payments to guarantee revenue. One can only speculate that talks broke down because no retailer would agree on a payment that would suit EMI, but walking away from what could have been a breakthrough in digital music sales might only hurt EMI as it does consumers.

Source:
The Register


Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • IFPI annual report praises labels for being forced to ditch DRM (24 January 2008)
  • Apple & EMI in deal, but no Beatles? (1 April 2007)
  • Puretracks removes DRM from 50,000 tracks (26 February 2007)
  • EMI leaning towards unprotected MP3 downloads? (12 February 2007)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    Samsung speeds up graphics memory
    Next news article »
    Puretracks removes DRM from 50,000 tracks
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    Auslander (AfterDawn Addict) 26 February 2007 7:18 Send private message to this user   
    treat people like criminals and what else can you expect them to be?


    to EMI
    duckNrun (Inactive) 26 February 2007 10:18 Send private message to this user   
    No big surprise here that they decided to stick with the outdated, costly and unwanted methods that they are used to.

    I fully agree with the writer that this could have been a boon to EMI. Heck look at the independant labels.:

    Quote:
    Unfortunately, digital sales have not filled up the gap for major labels, but have been successful for Independents
    The BIG 4 have to answer this question? WHY are the independants selling more?

    --Is it because the Big 4 can't attract and keep talent that the consumers want to hear? Certainly not! There is a reason they are called the Big 4

    --Are the downloads from the independants more valuable to the consumer and hence spurring on sales? Most likely the answer. But instead of embracing this method the major players scoff that without DRM they couldn't function and protect the same music that they sell on DRM free CD's that can be traded and upoloaded willy nilly!

    -- Are fans of independant music are more comfortable with digital items? No!

    -- Do fans of independant music have more expendable income to spend on music than fans of music produced by the 'Machine' that is the Big 4?


    If the answer IS in fact #1, #3 or #4 then the Big 4 are just basically screwed because there is not much that they can do to change those facts short of spending even more money on attracting talent (and maybe giving said talent more freedom to take risks and create music that may take years to build a true following like in the old days), providing classes to help people to become more comfortable with the media, reduce their prices so that their poor fans can afford to purchase their music.

    Under these choices the most logical and reasonable thing to do would be to jump on the #2 bandwagon and at least experiment with DRM free downloads. So what if 10 million DRM free songs get bought and even shared, these are songs already being shared via the CD! Fact is Yahoo Music has already done the investigative work and found that when they have offered DRM free songs for sale those tracks sell at a rate higher than they did when they had DRM!

    So exactly when are these music mogul Dinosaurs either going to evolve or become extinct? Personally I am hoping for extinction!
    borhan9 (AfterDawn Addict) 26 February 2007 11:40 Send private message to this user   
    This should not be surprising due to the fact that they figure any protection is better than none. But they forget to realise that people out there will break the protection regardless.
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2009 by AfterDawn Ltd.