AfterDawn: Tech news

Chinese DVD player manufacturers take patent owners to court

Written by Petteri Pyyny (Google+) @ 20 Jan 2005 14:02 User comments (4)

Chinese DVD player manufacturers take patent owners to court Group of Chinese DVD player manufacturers have filed a class action against the western consortium, 3C DVD Patent Group, who own most of the patents related to the DVD technology. The Chinese manufacturers behind the case include Wuxi Multimedia and Orient Power (Wuxi) Digital Technology.
Patent issues have been a hot topic during the last couple of years; the big fight was launched by Philips back in 2002 when it took the matters to courts in the U.S. and in the European Union, threatening to ban imports of unlicensed DVD players from China. Chinese manufacturers, such as Apex, had already managed to take lion's share of global DVD player markets, but refused to pay licensing fees for western patent owners that include Philips, Sony and Pioneer.

Eventually, most Chinese manufacturers and the 3C alliance forked a deal under which manufacturers pay a fixed fee of $20 (appx. 15.4) for each sold DVD player. But as DVD players' prices have plummeted, the fixed fee is now almost half of the average wholesale price for basic DVD players.

Companies behind the lawsuit that was filed in the US District Court in the Southern District of California, accuse 3C alliance for price-fixing, unlawful tying of essential and non-essential patents together, group boycott and conspiracy to monopolize. According to the Chinese companies, typically U.S. patent licensing fees for other products are between 3 and 5 percent of the item's wholesale price, compared to the 50 percent for DVD players.

Frustration of Chinese and Taiwanese companies has also sparked several emerging competitors to the DVD format. Most important one seems to be the Taiwanese FVD that seems to gain momentum in Asia as manufacturers become unwilling to pay royalty fees, at least for the players sold in their home markets.

Source: Digitimes

Previous Next  

4 user comments

121.1.2005 8:52

You know, I'm actually surprised this didn't happened sooner.

221.1.2005 12:27

I'd probably buy the Chinese hardware as opposed to U.S. patented copyrighted drm'd anti-consumer garbage.

323.1.2005 4:26

Seriously, pantents are there for a reason. It's to stop the inventor (or so-called inventor) of the technology not getting ripped off by other companys. You either buy the technology and pay for others invention or not. Price fixing doesn't come into it. They just pissed that they can't manufacturer it at 1/10th the price and corner the market like alot of other electronical goods.

425.1.2005 7:52

All discussions could be moot.............. A Beautiful Data Storage Dear data storage enterprises; Years ago I set out on a path to reinvent data storage in a new light ready to exceed the capacity, speed, bandwidth, cost, and having 1 media specification to handle this. http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/1/prweb200336.htm Since I read hundreds of publications, news articles, and have numerous sources of gossip and industry skull duggery. I would like to say for the companies working in the Blue / Red / Yellow / Green EM spectrum. I have always obeyed the rules of Respect and Responsibility and expect the storage industry to do the same. - Blu-Ray Phase Change Drives: - Hitachi, JVC, LG, Mitsubishi, Panasonic, Philips, Pioneer, Samsung, Sharp, Sony, Zenith. - Blu-Ray Phase Change Media: - Fujifilm, JVC, Maxell, Mitsubishi, Panasonic, Samsung, Sony, TDK, 3M. - MO Phase Change Drives: - Maxstor, Seagate. - Holographic Drives: - InPhase, Aprilis, Plasmon, Optware.

Comments have been disabled for this article.

News archive