User User name Password  
   
Tuesday 9.2.2010 / 09:35 PM
Search AfterDawn.com:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska   På norsk
afterdawn.com > news > no doj intervention in riaa case
Show topics
News
News

No DoJ intervention in RIAA case

31 July 2007 18:18 by James "Dela" Delahunty | 2 comments

No DoJ intervention in RIAA case The U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) will not be intervening in Atlantic v. Boggs - a lawsuit brought against defendant Michael Boggs for allegedly sharing music without permission - as the RIAA and Boggs have agreed to dismiss the action with prejudice. The DoJ was deciding whether or not to intervene in the case as Boggs filed a counterclaim seeking a declaratory judgment that the damages sought by the RIAA ($750 per track) were unconstitutionally excessive.

Last November, defendant Marie Lindor accused the RIAA of seeking excessive damages. The judge presiding over that case (Universal v. Lindor) allowed Lindor to argue that the actual damages suffered by the record companies was around 70c per track, which is about what record companies make from each music download sale.

The record companies attempted to block Lindor from attempts to gain access to the wholesale price per track, saying it was highly confidential data. However, a lawyer for Universal later said that 70c per track was in the correct range. When Michael Boggs challenged the constitutionality of the statutory damages section of the Copyright Act in his counterclaim, the DoJ filed a motion asking the court to allow it 60 days to decide whether to intervene in the case.

A brief arguing for the constitutionality of the $750 per track figure demanded by the RIAA would have been interesting, but now it wont happen at least in this case.

Source:
Ars Technica


Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • DOJ not happy about proposed IP law (15 December 2007)
  • Judge agrees with RIAA about distribution (28 August 2007)
  • Defendent argues "making files available" isn't infringement (20 August 2007)
  • RIAA sued by consumer citing illegal tactics (17 August 2007)
  • Children sued by RIAA try to bring Sharman with them (16 August 2007)
  • Tech industry wants more fair use rights (5 August 2007)
  • Germany refuses to cooperate with music industry (4 August 2007)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    Universal VP adds fuel to HD format war
    Next news article »
    Apple sued over iPhone battery
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    borhan9 (AfterDawn Addict) 2 August 2007 16:04 Send private message to this user   
    Well it seems that they came up to a conclusion and agreement out of court hence case was dismissed.
    Unfocused (Member) 14 August 2007 14:41 Send private message to this user   
    I would think that this will be revisited. As more and more people are standing up to the RIAA, a definitive conclusion is bound to come about.
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2010 by AfterDawn Ltd.