| Discuss this article! |
| dude845 (Senior Member) 19 September 2007 16:34 |
|
|
They are absolute morons..
|
| Martone10 (Newbie) 19 September 2007 17:26 |
|
|
WTF these guys are a**holes i cant believe they make a big fuss about piracy but then they turn around and use it to choose the next hit single for an artist then they will sue you for downloading songs this may be the smartest thing ive ever heard
|
| Pop_Smith (Senior Member) 19 September 2007 17:55 |
|
|
Maybe its to get around the "It takes money to make money" rule.
If they sue others and scare them into paying that way the RIAA/MPAA doesn't have to pay for marketing to find out what type of song/movie should be released next as their "I hope this catches well" track or movie.
Peace
|
| webe123 (Inactive) 19 September 2007 18:28 |
|
It seems as if the RIAA is taking a "if you can't beat 'em..... Join 'EM" approach Now if they can just get out of the dark ages thinking that suing people is going to help their cause.....
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 19 September 2007 18:28
|
| hughjars (Inactive) 20 September 2007 2:53 |
|
|
Of course they're just hypocritical, cynical, spiteful, short-sighted ba*tards being totally fake to the truth,
sharing generates sales that would otherwise never be made.
(personally I think much of this 'piracy noise' is just a con for dopey shareholders & politicians/legislators they think believe their 'otherwise we would have made trillions!' cr@p)
The whole point here is - or ought to be - wrapped up in the parts sharing can't give you, the 'added value' that comes with the full retail package......but of course that implies they actually have to shift their bloated idle a$$es and be bothered about and make the effort to release an attractive value product in the 1st place.
There are numerous examples in my own collection where I have d/l'ed the ripped version of something and then bought the retail version on the back of that to get full Dolby Digital/DTS 5.1 audio etc etc.
I know I am far from alone in this.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 20 September 2007 2:54
|
| runar (Newbie) 20 September 2007 3:13 |
|
|
absofuckinglutely brilliant thinking :D
|
| emugamer (Junior Member) 20 September 2007 8:00 |
|
Originally posted by hughjars: There are numerous examples in my own collection where I have d/l'ed the ripped version of something and then bought the retail version on the back of that to get full Dolby Digital/DTS 5.1 audio etc etc.
I know I am far from alone in this.
Same here.
|
| SProdigy (Member) 20 September 2007 8:23 |
|
Originally posted by hughjars: There are numerous examples in my own collection where I have d/l'ed the ripped version of something and then bought the retail version on the back of that to get full Dolby Digital/DTS 5.1 audio etc etc.
I know I am far from alone in this.
Indeed my friend. Indeed.
I refuse to buy something that is absolute crap. Maybe monitoring P2P "buzz" on some of these artists can help them effectively put less crap. Then again, they are being hypocrites about this whole concept in the first place.
|
| DVDdoug (Junior Member) 20 September 2007 10:45 |
|
|
It seems quite logical to me. If a song is poplular on P2P, it's probably going to be popular in general. Since they are monitoring P2P traffic anyway, why not maximize use of the data?
|
| MightyOne (Junior Member) 20 September 2007 12:42 |
|
|
Sounds logical to do.
If nobody wants it for FREE, then why would they want to pay for it !
It would be nice if "THEY" at least stopped with the BS. If the time ever comes that "THEY" decide to tell the truth about something and come clean...nobody will believe them. They cried "wolf" too many times.
|
| redux79 (Junior Member) 20 September 2007 13:39 |
|
While random people are being sued for shock value, record label’s are spying on the same p2p streams to figure out which bubble gum pop single to release next. The mpaa is going to make my head explode!!!
|
| SuomiP (Member) 21 September 2007 0:55 |
|
How to block MD
"MediaDefender is a kind of the criminal organization which acts by the support and money of international media companies.
For your protection:
1) Download
http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3812404/Medi...or_PeerGuardian
2) Unpack.
3) Add this list to your Peer Guardian 2 program."
|
| maitland (Newbie) 22 September 2007 15:35 |
|
|
I think this is great news. This is exactly what media companies should do. They will never stop piracy, but if they are able to use it to their advantage, everyone wins.
~Maitland
|
| JAYMES71 (Newbie) 22 September 2007 15:51 |
|
Just three words:
NEW WORLD ORDER
'nuff said. Asshole RIAA, MPAA and all other hypocrappers.
|
| militantm (Junior Member) 23 September 2007 6:50 |
|
|
does anybody actucally think "they" want any of this to stop? at this point the industry can't survive without it. they don't want you stop dui or speeding in your car, it's all profit to them, they don't care if your a freaking turnip, their gonna get their blood somehow. if they have to break a couple eggs to make an omlet so be it. it's all about their bottom line, it's all a free advertisement and profit. they don't want you to think they look at it that way but the reality is they actually do. here's a for instance, right now I'm watching Van Halen tour rehearsals on the web. do you actually think they would allow that to leak if they didn't want it to? they're trying to create a buzz, good or bad in this case, vip tix are $1000 and $500 and they don't even tell you what seat your getting. onsale to public is $125, they gotta move those seats, so they have crate a motivation to get the working class to spend that kinda money. those are the dollars they're looking for. the fat cats are few and far between, the working class make up the majority no matter what they would have you believe.
|
| borhan9 (AfterDawn Addict) 28 September 2007 4:08 |
|
|
This is the way they should see technology as a plus not as a minus due to the fact that they can gage popularity is a plus for them at a minimum cost.
|