User User name Password  
   
Friday 5.9.2008 / 02:13 AM
Search:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > oregon attorney general comes out swinging in riaa case
Show topics
News
News

Oregon Attorney General comes out swinging in RIAA case

1 December 2007 18:49 by Rich "vurbal" Fiscus | 22 comments

Oregon Attorney General comes out swinging in RIAA  case Last month the Oregon Attorney General announced that he would help the University of Oregon fight a standard RIAA subpoena that would require them to find and release the identities of 17 students to the RIAA. Now he's going on the offensive, calling RIAA investegatory practices in question and issuing some subpeonas of his own for the trade group's investegators.

According to a motion filed by the Attorney General's office, there are many questions surrounding RIAA tactics, some of which the AG feels may be illegal in Oregon. In fact SafeNet, the company the RIAA pays to find infringers, isn't even licensed to operate in Oregon. The AG argues

The motion also states that RIAA lawyers have refused to answer questions by the AG's office regarding whether they had engaged in data mining to find "personal and confidential information." Now the Attorney General would like to know "precisely how invasive Plaintiffs' investigation was." Specifically, it says "Plaintiffs may be spying on students who use the University's computer system and may be accessing much more than IP addresses."

The motion also requests the court to require the RIAA to "Describe with particularity the economic damage, if any, that the RIAA suffered as a result of the unlawful conduct of each Doe Defendant." This is certainly something that many people would like explained. Of course since the RIAA is normally facing individuals without the deep pockets required to pay for a sustained legal battle they're normally not taken to task for their damage claims.

Depending on whether the judge allows the discovery asked for by the Attorney General, and what answers he gets from RIAA representatives, it seems likely that this will will end up being a landmark case that either signals the beginning of the end of the RIAA's legal jihad or legal justification for even more suits.

Source: Ars Technica

Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • RIAA to prosecutors: beware of crack dealing pirates (21 February 2008)
  • RIAA contractors accused of illegal investigation in New York (5 February 2008)
  • EU court shoots down attempt to force ISP disclosure of customer data (29 January 2008)
  • Qtrax client finally available for download - but don't expect any music (28 January 2008)
  • RIAA beaten in court by Tanya Andersen yet again (17 January 2008)
  • Reports of the RIAA suing over CD ripping prove to be unfounded (3 January 2008)
  • University of Washington may not cooperate with RIAA (3 January 2008)
  • Thomas to get new lawyer team for RIAA case appeal (1 January 2008)
  • 50 Cent stands behind file sharing (8 December 2007)
  • Limewire suit against music labels thrown out of US federal court (4 December 2007)
  • EMI looking to cut back on RIAA funding (28 November 2007)
  • RIAA may not have authority for university subpoenas (20 November 2007)
  • Oregon Attorney General takes on RIAA over subpoena (6 November 2007)
  • RIAA trying to dodge legal fees after dropping case (18 October 2007)
  • Woman to pay full record label damages herself (5 October 2007)
  • IFPI statement on U.S. file sharing verdict (5 October 2007)
  • RIAA sued by consumer citing illegal tactics (17 August 2007)
  • RIAA throws in towel in Tanya Andersen case (4 June 2007)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    Netflix looks to tap $25 billion dollar gift card industry
    Next news article »
    Pepsi and Amazon to give away DRM free music
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    b18bek9 (Member) 1 December 2007 23:04 Send private message to this user   
    Nice to see the riaa is losing more friends in congress. Yea for the Oregons Attorney General in stepping in to see what the riaa is really doing when the investigate and get there info.
    mediabob (Member) 1 December 2007 23:29 Send private message to this user   
    YES. this is going to be a precedent case. im gonna need to follow this!
    ZoSoIV (AfterDawn Addict) 2 December 2007 0:04 Send private message to this user   
    hopefully there completely de-funded
    swarmpack (Member) 2 December 2007 5:39 Send private message to this user   
    this should prove to be a good case. please keep us posted on the outcome.
    duckNrun (Member) 2 December 2007 6:25 Send private message to this user   
    RIAA et. al.:

    take your business model off life support and let it die with dignity.

    Those who have listened to the most important person in the economic model, the customer, have benefited from listening and giving them what they want: music in a format that works on all their devices and lets them use their music the way they always have used it.

    The market relies on two factors: Sellers bringing goods and customers interested in buying those goods. If their are no goods then nobody wins. If customers are not willing to buy the goods that are brought or not willing to buy those goods at the listed prices then nobody wins.

    Final things to consider:
    --You cannot fight and win the war on piracy by driving away your paying customer base.
    --You can fight but you can never win the war on piracy. Some people will always try to get what they want without paying.
    --Supply and demand are affected by the 'black market'. If the market price is too unbearable people will not buy the goods. For those who are not opposed to such concepts these people will turn to the black market to meet their demand.
    --Demand is limited and when it comes to black market digital copies supply is limitless. A supply and demand curve fail in the face of this fact. An endless supply and limited demand forces the price point to near zero. Near zero is untenable pricing for most businesses. These facts are not fair but these are the facts
    --Those who refuse to face the facts about their business ultimately face a business that fails

    The days of taking whatever you can from your customer base has ended. The days where customers give you what they want are upon you. Yes, the days of record profits are over. The gravy train has officially ended. Face the realities of the new music market, aknowledge what your customers are wanting from you, and give them what they want and you will succeed-- maybe not as handsomely as before but you will still exist in the upper tier of societal incomes. Be happy with what you can get.
    hughjars (Inactive) 2 December 2007 10:00 Send private message to this user   
    Riaa (and the MPAA) cut your losses, kill yourselves.
    duckNrun (Member) 2 December 2007 13:33 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by hughjars:
    Riaa (and the MPAA) cut your losses, kill yourselves.
    or there is that option too.....lol

    ;-)
    Xplorer4 (Member) 2 December 2007 16:00 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    "Describe with particularity the economic damage, if any, that the RIAA suffered as a result of the unlawful conduct of each Doe Defendant."

    Seeing as the RIAA did not actually put any money into making the content in question, have they suffered any loss?

    Now if there referring to the record company in itself, then let's first be sure that the Doe in question did or did not actually purchase the album/singles after downloading them.
    redux79 (Junior Member) 2 December 2007 18:05 Send private message to this user   
    Awesome, someone with actual clout finally broke out the metaphorical bitch be good stick. Looks like the riaa is finally on defensive instead of suing/raping single mothers, college kids, and otherwise defenseless people. I hope the attorney general cracks them a good one.
    emugamer (Junior Member) 3 December 2007 7:15 Send private message to this user   
    The AG must have a kid or friends who have kids who are in this school, which would be great. The absurdity of the Jamie Thomas case surely made everyone shake their head in disbelief. If the industry will go after a single mother for all she is worth and more, then they will definitely show no mercy to a kid in college, probably going after his/her family and all future salaries. You can only push someone so far before they strike back. I just hope it's their death blow.
    MightyOne (Junior Member) 3 December 2007 10:25 Send private message to this user   
    The RIAA will just pay who they need to off to have things their way.

    Money talks...BullSh*t walks !!!

    Like emugamer says, "You can only push someone so far before they strike back"....hence...what open the doorway to change is if some poor Joe that they shaft just a little to much....SNAPS....heads on over to the RIAA head office...and resorts to a "Killing Spree".

    Everyone has a breaking point. Who's first ?
    maryjayne (Junior Member) 3 December 2007 10:39 Send private message to this user   
    I cant wait to hear how the RIAA justifies $26,000 per song (or whatever number they choose). Espicially when each song could have been legally purchased for $0.99, not all of which is going to the RIAA.
    I am sure the RIAA is looking for ways to withdrawl their subpoenas now since their tactic is to submit as many lawsuits as possible and when the court case starts to get too costly, then drop the charges.
    janega (Junior Member) 3 December 2007 10:57 Send private message to this user   
    Time to move to Oregon!!
    spydah (Junior Member) 3 December 2007 13:50 Send private message to this user   
    I'm glad somebodies taken up for the little people.
    7thsinger (AfterDawn Addict) 3 December 2007 15:23 Send private message to this user   
    It's seriously about time someone in the legal system sees the reality that the RIAA's information gathering tactics are bogus if not infringing on people's rights. Good for the Attorney General of Oregon!
    JRude (Junior Member) 3 December 2007 22:42 Send private message to this user   
    I always have held that there is NO JUDICIAL REVIEW in a Court CLERK signing legal papers as a JUDGE should....UNCONSTITUTIONAL! We shall see now, hopefully! ;- )
    morguex (Inactive) 5 December 2007 17:01 Send private message to this user   
    I'll be following this one to the end.
    It'll be very interesting.

    I think the RIAA might just have pissed off the wrong person, or at least I hope they did.

    Peace all
    7thsinger (AfterDawn Addict) 5 December 2007 17:34 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by morguex:
    I'll be following this one to the end.
    It'll be very interesting.

    I think the RIAA might just have pissed off the wrong person, or at least I hope they did.

    Peace all
    Hells Yeah! I'll be watching it all the way as well.

    And Shepards we shall be...
    jacksmate (Newbie) 7 December 2007 22:01 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by duckNrun:
    RIAA et. al.:

    take your business model off life support and let it die with dignity.

    Those who have listened to the most important person in the economic model, the customer, have benefited from listening and giving them what they want: music in a format that works on all their devices and lets them use their music the way they always have used it.

    The market relies on two factors: Sellers bringing goods and customers interested in buying those goods. If their are no goods then nobody wins. If customers are not willing to buy the goods that are brought or not willing to buy those goods at the listed prices then nobody wins.

    Final things to consider:
    --You cannot fight and win the war on piracy by driving away your paying customer base.
    --You can fight but you can never win the war on piracy. Some people will always try to get what they want without paying.
    --Supply and demand are affected by the 'black market'. If the market price is too unbearable people will not buy the goods. For those who are not opposed to such concepts these people will turn to the black market to meet their demand.
    --Demand is limited and when it comes to black market digital copies supply is limitless. A supply and demand curve fail in the face of this fact. An endless supply and limited demand forces the price point to near zero. Near zero is untenable pricing for most businesses. These facts are not fair but these are the facts
    --Those who refuse to face the facts about their business ultimately face a business that fails

    The days of taking whatever you can from your customer base has ended. The days where customers give you what they want are upon you. Yes, the days of record profits are over. The gravy train has officially ended. Face the realities of the new music market, aknowledge what your customers are wanting from you, and give them what they want and you will succeed-- maybe not as handsomely as before but you will still exist in the upper tier of societal incomes. Be happy with what you can get.
    jacksmate (Newbie) 7 December 2007 22:06 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by duckNrun:
    RIAA et. al.:

    take your business model off life support and let it die with dignity.

    Those who have listened to the most important person in the economic model, the customer, have benefited from listening and giving them what they want: music in a format that works on all their devices and lets them use their music the way they always have used it.

    The market relies on two factors: Sellers bringing goods and customers interested in buying those goods. If their are no goods then nobody wins. If customers are not willing to buy the goods that are brought or not willing to buy those goods at the listed prices then nobody wins.

    Final things to consider:
    --You cannot fight and win the war on piracy by driving away your paying customer base.
    --You can fight but you can never win the war on piracy. Some people will always try to get what they want without paying.
    --Supply and demand are affected by the 'black market'. If the market price is too unbearable people will not buy the goods. For those who are not opposed to such concepts these people will turn to the black market to meet their demand.
    --Demand is limited and when it comes to black market digital copies supply is limitless. A supply and demand curve fail in the face of this fact. An endless supply and limited demand forces the price point to near zero. Near zero is untenable pricing for most businesses. These facts are not fair but these are the facts
    --Those who refuse to face the facts about their business ultimately face a business that fails

    The days of taking whatever you can from your customer base has ended. The days where customers give you what they want are upon you. Yes, the days of record profits are over. The gravy train has officially ended. Face the realities of the new music market, aknowledge what your customers are wanting from you, and give them what they want and you will succeed-- maybe not as handsomely as before but you will still exist in the upper tier of societal incomes. Be happy with what you can get.
    like most tyrants, these (recording industrty)guys are going to fight till the death.. YOURS and MINE if need be..
    Mate

    [img][/img]

    jacksmate (Newbie) 7 December 2007 22:11 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by JRude:
    I always have held that there is NO JUDICIAL REVIEW in a Court CLERK signing legal papers as a JUDGE should....UNCONSTITUTIONAL! We shall see now, hopefully! ;- )
    Quote:
    Everything is bought and paid for... why do you think they can voilate our rights in their quest to frame someone, as they did with the nice lady who never even owned a computer......
    borhan9 (AfterDawn Addict) 22 December 2007 17:59 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    According to a motion filed by the Attorney General's office, there are many questions surrounding RIAA tactics, some of which the AG feels may be illegal in Oregon. In fact SafeNet, the company the RIAA pays to find infringers, isn't even licensed to operate in Oregon. The AG argues
    Trying to get something passed in a state that its not allowed is what is called against the law and hopefully the AG can see this and blow them out of the water.

    Quote:
    The motion also states that RIAA lawyers have refused to answer questions by the AG's office regarding whether they had engaged in data mining to find "personal and confidential information." Now the Attorney General would like to know "precisely how invasive Plaintiffs' investigation was." Specifically, it says "Plaintiffs may be spying on students who use the University's computer system and may be accessing much more than IP addresses."
    All in all this is an ilegal action its what we call hacking into peoples private systems without notification. If the average computer user can not do this because its against the law organizations like the riaa and mpaa should also obey this law.

    If they wish to do this they only way i can see the riaa and mpaa going ahead with infiltrating users computers is by getting a court order that allows them to do that and this case may give them that power lets hope not.

    I would like to see where this case leads.
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums | DVD X Copy Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi | fin.MP3Lizard.com
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2008 by AfterDawn Ltd.