Originally posted by juankerr:
All this worry about 1.1 and 2.0 is much ado about nothing and reeks of sour grapes IMO.
- How can you say that in all honesty when the BDA themselves have recently agreed that not only is it perfectly possible that 'profile 1.0' & 'profile 1.1' owners may well have serious problems playing back 'profile 2.0' discs
(and so it wasn't just a case of
HD DVD 'FUD' at all)
but that if they do then it's hard lines, they are on their own cos the "knew what they were getting into"?!
It's pretty funny now to recall the synthetic complaints from the (now silent) PS3/Blu-ray supporters who all pretended to cry their eyes out that it was so totally terrible that the relative handful of
Toshiba HD A1 owners might have had problems accessing the 3rd layer of the 51gb HD DVD TL discs.
Hypocrite fanboys or what?
Originally posted by juankerr:
Assuming that majority of BluRay players out there are PS3
- I though the BDA said there were 250,000+ stand-alone owners out there?
Still, nevermind, eh, s*d them?
Originally posted by juankerr:
we can safely say that majority of players will be able to handle 2.0 movies when Sony releases the 2.0 update for the PS3.
- Well no, I don't think you can reasonably do that.
After all that the BDA have said so far in regard to this matter (they - lied? - denied this completely for an age and pretended it was all just HD DVD 'FUD) you're taking some leap of faith there.
Originally posted by juankerr:
Early adopters are fully aware of this and for them this is a non-issue.
- Which is great and a true-ism we all know.
.....except that the
Blu-ray side are hardly presenting any (nevermind all) of their current kit as being at the "early adopter" stage.
What this comes down to is that we ought to avoid everything currently on the market in terms of a stand-alone and accept a bunch of assurances from a bunch of proven liars about the PS3 being the only Blu-ray player currently available with the possibility of being able to work properly with 'profile 2.0' discs.
So, the choice Blu-ray currently offers is either -
1) take a chance on a sub-spec player or
2) go for an over-priced & limited game console?
No thanks. Not one of those options appeals; I'll take the 3rd.
3) continue to buy from the large and growing catalogue of HD DVD movies
(Universal & Paramount have so excellent big titles out this year),
watch my HD TV services & make full use of my DVR, download & upscale SD DVD movies when I can't get them any other way on HD.
Blu-ray remains incomplete, over-priced and IMO not worth the bother.
Clearly they are still years away from coming to the mass-market with decently spec'd & reasonably priced players.
Blu-ray may turn out to have won the tussle with HD DVD
(tho HD DVD will not be disappearing any time soon)
but it will not win the war to replace SD DVD.
Too little too late & for far too much money.