Mobile/PDA About Us Advertise here


		User name	Password

		Not registered yet? Register here. Lost your password? Click here.

Browse by topic

News

Online TV service in conflict with UK broadcasters

2 May 2008 11:11 by Rich "vurbal" Fiscus | 2 comments

Zattoo, a company based out of both Switzerland and the US, by streaming live TV signals from the UK without authorization from the original broadcaster. The broadcasts are available for free from the Zattoo website, along with TV channels from other countries. Although the company has made deals with broadcasters in other countries for re-broadcast of their signals, they're taking advantage of what the company's owners see as a loophole in UK copyright law that they say doesn't require such an agreement as long as they're only providing the live signal.

Although Beat Knecht, chief executive and co-founder, said: "Zattoo is not in conflict" with broadcasters, adding "We feel we have legal title to retransmit."

While the broadcasters clearly aren't happy about the way Zattoo is doing business, there haven't been an actual legal challenge to the practice yet. The BBC is concerned about the lack of a licensing agreemement, but so far has had nothing to say about the legality of Zattoo's operation.

According to the Financial Times, a representative from Channel 4 said "We are looking in detail at the legal position."

Gilles BianRosa, chief executive of Vuze, which distributes films and TV shows online, says "Content providers can't go after every start-up that they think is infringing. Technology is moving faster than the law, so there are a lot of grey areas. You have to push the limits a little bit and test it."

At the same time it may be a lttle short sighted of Zattoo to take advantage of the law rather than getting agreements in place with UK broadcasters up front. According to Kim Walker, head of intellectual property law at Pinsent Masons, "The Act says that the Secretary of State has the power to withdraw the permission at any time," adding "If this is a loophole that as a matter of policy the Government isn't happy with people exploiting, then it would appear to be a relatively simple matter for the Secretary of State to say that the right does not apply to re-transmission online."

Permalink to this article | Topics: IPTV Online video

Consumer Watchdog says UK Copyright laws are the worst (16 April 2009)

Vuze, now playing everywhere (23 March 2009)

ABC revamps online video player (22 May 2008)

Summer Redstone loves copyright protection (7 May 2008)

WB is resurrected as online video network (28 April 2008)

iPlayer coming to the PS3, eventually (15 April 2008)

BBC spars with Internet Service Providers over iPlayer (10 April 2008)

iPlayer comes to the Wii (9 April 2008)

Velocix to begin live streaming TV, compete with Joost (27 March 2008)

Hulu is now open to the public (12 March 2008)

CBS adds classic TV shows to streaming lineup (23 February 2008)

Vuze and Broadbandtv team up (29 January 2008)

Veoh adds videos from Hulu (16 January 2008)

CES 2008: DivX Connected adds content from Veoh and Vuze (8 January 2008)

U.S. viewers continue to embrace online and mobile video (28 December 2007)

NBC online video moves to the Hulu private beta (29 October 2007)

NBC pulls plug on YouTube channel (21 October 2007)

Joost 1.0 now available to the public (2 October 2007)

More Hollywood insiders back Veoh (12 September 2007)

« Previous news article
Sony set to adjust PlayStation Store prices for Canadians

Next news article »
New guides added for encoding AVC video from DVD with MeGUI

Post your comment

Discuss this article!
nobrainer (Inactive) 2 May 2008 13:00
cool i'll check this out. The BPI Are: SONY, UNIVERSAL, WARNER GROUP, EMI. The RIAA Soundexchange Are: SONY, UNIVERSAL, WARNER GROUP, EMI. The IFPI Are: The same anti consumer lot as listed above! The MPAA Are: SONY, UNIVERSAL, WARNER GROUP, DISNEY, PARAMOUNT, FOX. [ + quote] This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 2 May 2008 13:00
Solo_Tek (Junior Member) 2 May 2008 15:31
The article says: "Zattoo, a company based out of both Switzerland and the US, by streaming live TV signals from the UK without authorization from the original broadcaster." When you enter the site and click download it says: "You seem to be accessing the Zattoo website from a country we do not yet serve. Please enter your country of residence below, and when our service is available there, we will contact you." How new is the is site and why are we getting the transmission before other countries even though the company is partially based in the US? [ + quote]