User User name Password  
   
Saturday 21.11.2009 / 10:28 AM
Search AfterDawn.com:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > eff: riaa victim deserves day in court
Show topics
News
News

EFF: RIAA victim deserves day in court

11 April 2007 4:57 by James "Dela" Delahunty | 5 comments

EFF: RIAA victim deserves day in court The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has filed a brief with a New York district court, urging a judge to allow Rolando Amurao, a target of an RIAA lawsuit, to fight back with counterclaims of his own. The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) sued Amurao for copyright infringement but has now moved to dismiss the claims made.

Amurao however, believes that the RIAA's case was meritless and that it was intended to harass him and has countersued for a declaration of non-infringement and a finding of RIAA copyright misuse. In its brief, the EFF has argued that giving the accused his day in court will increase the RIAA's accountability in the industry's broad lawsuit campaign against file-sharing.

"If Amurao's allegations are true, then he has the right to clear his name," said EFF Staff Attorney Corynne McSherry. "It's simply unfair to shield copyright owners from the consequences of careless lawsuits. Counterclaims like Amurao's help make sure that the RIAA can't simply dismiss its case and walk away when an innocent target fights back." Since 2003, the RIAA has filed thousands of lawsuits against file sharers in the U.S. However, at times the RIAA's tactics have shown to be sloppy and careless, yet most accused decide to settle because it is the more affordable option.

Source:
EFF


Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • Electric Slide creator calls off online takedown campaign (22 May 2007)
  • RIAA lawsuit target prevails in court (11 April 2007)
  • MPAA and RIAA also back US decision to file piracy case against China (10 April 2007)
  • RIAA chases down promotional tracks (8 April 2007)
  • Canada's new Government shows support of Canadian music (6 April 2007)
  • DFC wants to help organize students against RIAA abuses (2 April 2007)
  • RIAA's case against New York woman faltering (22 March 2007)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    Cracked WinDVD 8 HD-DVD and Blu-Ray keys removed
    Next news article »
    Washington Post offers HD content via iTunes
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    Unfocused (Member) 11 April 2007 11:19 Send private message to this user   
    Maybe the tide is finally changing for the RIAA.
    webe123 (Inactive) 11 April 2007 18:47 Send private message to this user   
    I was HOPING this would happen....mabye now the tables are turned and the RIAA has to come up with a REASON they sued this guy in the first place. If they cannot I hope the judge sets a precedant others can follow.

    Mabye next time they won't be so eager to start a lawsuit without PROOF!
    rondack (Junior Member) 13 April 2007 17:59 Send private message to this user   
    F***K the RIAA
    Tashammer (Newbie) 13 April 2007 18:48 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by rondack:
    F***K the RIAA
    don't forget the ones who authorised it all and who pay RIAA's wages.
    Mez (Senior Member) 15 April 2007 8:29 Send private message to this user   
    Nothing has changed. RIAA will continue to do what they have been doing. Maybe they will be more careful. They have always been a bit careful in their marks. There are more than 200 million ipods out there and probably an equal number of mp3 players. They are only going after the 'top' .0001% of the offenders. I suspect they don't go after more because each suit can have a down side. This is just one down side there have been many more. One of these years they will figure out how to shut down P2P. Get it while you can. There is always the 'sneeker net'. There is little they will be able to do break that one.

    There main goal it to get back to the good old days which will never happen. The next best thing is to sell a huge number of crippled, low BP tunes for lots of money. Tunes which were sold 40 years ago for .3$ now go for $1. They 'need' to sell the tunes for that price because their costs are so high. They need to lower the cost and up the bit rate if they want to make money.
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2009 by AfterDawn Ltd.