Originally posted by ThaJazz:
Just so you know: the 360 HD add-on is for movies ONLY.
- Yeah, that's the idea.
If you don't want or need a high def movie player you aren't forced into paying for one.
It's also a brilliant little
HD DVD ROM drive for anyone with a decent & recent PC.
Originally posted by ThaJazz:
The BR player can play BR movies AND GAMES.
- Indeed......and seeing as how this generation of blue lasers have a limited life-span we'll soon be seeing just how it maybe wasn't such a great idea to combine the 2 uses like that.
Not that any of the BD fanclub will even admit to this.
Originally posted by ThaJazz:
a BR disc can hold 50gb on a single layer.
- Er, no it can't.
BD can store 25gb on a single layer and 50gb on a dual layer disc.
Originally posted by ThaJazz:
HD discs can only hold 30gb.
- Wrong once again.
HD DVD can currently store 15gb on a single layer, 30gb on a dual layer.
They have just submitted for approval from the DVD Forum 17gb per layer up to a maximum of triple layered 51gb discs.
Originally posted by ThaJazz:
Now think about this...X360 games can only be 8.5gb at the most using DL.
- Did the possibility of 2 or 3 or even 4 discs ever enter your head?
It's not exactly unknown in the PC world so why not?
Originally posted by ThaJazz:
The PS3 game discs can hold 50gb on a single layer.
- No they can't.
BD has a maximum of 25gb per layer.
......and if you can link to anyone who is really going to be using 50gb dual layer for a mere game I'd love to hear of it.
The truth is that with the PS3 losing so many exclusive games the PS3 version will be little different to the same game appearing on PC, XBox 360 and Wii
(the sole 'difference' might be a shed-load of boring FMV making 'use' of the extra space).
Originally posted by ThaJazz:
I have read that a company has made a 4 layer BR disc...200gb.
- The 100gb & 200gb multi-layer discs have been demonstrated in the lab only.
Existing hardware cannot play them
(you don't have a laser able to read 4 layers in the PS3 for a start)
and seeing as they have had huge troubles making a reliable dual layer 50gb disc (production yields have been low) thoughts of 100gb or 200gb are very very premature.
In fact it's probably most likely that (if they ever do escape the lab and stop being vaporware) that that media will be so expensive, as will be the hardware necessary to use it, that they remain confined to professional bulk data storage businesses.
But right now that's all they are, nothing but pure vaporware to speculate over.
Originally posted by ThaJazz:
thats a lot of gaming space.
- No it isn't.
It's just you playing a little day-dreaming game of 'ifs, buts and maybes' with yourself.
You have no serious and realistic factual basis to make such a claim.
Originally posted by ThaJazz:
So to compare X360 to PS3 is like apples to oranges.
- No, they are actually very very similar to each other in capability.
One is slightly better in one area and the other in another area of performance.
There's very very little in it.
As far as games go the situation is very different.
Spec-sheet jockeys quibbling over the minutia of each machine might be interesting to a handful but it's the games that matter to most.
Right now the PS3 has little except in-house exclusive Sony games and a pricetag that is keeping the punters away.....and with the recently announced low profits of the Sony group and their losses on each PS3 that pricing situation is not going to be changing any time soon.
Originally posted by ThaJazz:
They both are gaming systems and that about the only thing they have in common.
- Er, that's kind of like saying the only thing TVs have in common are that they are TVs.
Yeah and what?
Originally posted by ThaJazz:
NEVER CHOOSE WHAT NEW GAMING SYSTEM TO BUY....BUY THEM ALL....I love both of them...
- Good for you.
I don't mean to sound off with you but you'd be making a much better and more informed choice if you actually had the facts about each system
(and not some of the myths and half-understood ideas about each you've shown here).
Originally posted by ThaJazz:
who cares about all that tech sh!t anyway give me good games and a fair price and the rest dont matter.
- Ignorance is never a better choice, sorry but it just isn't.
Originally posted by ThaJazz:
look oblivion was on a standard disk and wow that game was huge so dont tell me that 50gig is needed for video games right now.
- You're not going to be seeing people making genuine full use of the 25gb disc for a very long time (FMV 'padding out' aside), nevermind 50gb.
Originally posted by ThaJazz:
all i been trying to say is that if sony made the ps3 a game console first that more would have sold.
- I'd agree with that, I think zippy says as much regularly here too.
If they hadn't tried to force BD along they would probably have done much much better (but even so I don't think the XBox 360 would have been wiped out either).
Basically they got greedy, tried to use the gamers and are now paying the price.
It's perfectly possible that PS3 continues to bomb - latest sales data in the USA show monthly sales under the 100,000 level now.