The lawsuit also claims that Universal and Warner have neglected the label's copyrights and royalties when signing deals with online stores, including iTunes and Napster.
Those two giant record companies agreed to online distribution of Dawg Music's library, but did not acquire permission first from the label. Dawg claims that because of the lack of communication, the label received "gross underpayments," and that online music stores are "guilty by association because they agreed to host and sell the unsanctioned tracks."
The suit accuses the following companies of trading songs without genuine consent:
AOL Music Now, Buy.com, Apple's iTunes, MSN.com, Napster, RealNetworks' Rhapsody, Wal-Mart.com, and Yahoo Music.
Dawg hopes to receive $150,000 USD for each copyrighted work they feel was downloaded without genuine consent.
Source:
MacNN