AfterDawn: Tech news in court : doesn't go too well

Written by Petteri Pyyny (Google+) @ 30 Aug 2000 19:55 has spent this week in court with Seagram's Universal Music Group -- the court has to decide whether or not the's executives understood that their service is illegal and violates record companies copyrights.
So far the hearings have caused some major trouble for's defence arguments. Today judge rejected's claims that Universal wants to put out of business because Universal has similiar business plans as and it wants to kill the competition. Judge rejected the argument because it doesn't actually have anything to do with the hearings -- the sole and only purpose of these court dates going on currently, is to define did the's understand that their service is illegal.

Yesterday Michael Robertson was under very heavy fire from UMG when he claimed that he thought that their service is legal before they launched it -- he didn't have any legal professional's opinion to back this decision back then. Judge also said that it seems to be ridicilous to claim that someone who is in this business, doesn't ask for legal opinion before his company launches something completely new.

The issue why was found guilty in April is not because of their service itself, but the fact that company "pre-loaded" their music library and purchased CDs worth of $1M and used those CDs in digital format to provide the service for customers instead of actually copying every time the data from the CD that customer sends to them for sale.

Previous Next  
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest user comments

News archive