Warner Music regrets MySpace Music deal

Written by James Delahunty @ 15 Apr 2009 11:14 User comments (7)

The MySpace Music project is only 6 months old, and it's 75 million or so users are streaming literally billions of songs per month. Under any normal regular deal with the record labels, a price would be set per stream that would have to be paid to the label. This is what you would think is in place at MySpace Music, because it certainly is at many other online audio services.

However, sources have told TechCrunch that Warner Music Group has been making some noise about the deal they struck with MySpace Music. It would appear that the deal does not have any pay-per-stream agreement setup. Instead, WMG gets a share of the advertising that is displayed when a user streams its songs.

That advertising revenue is not turning out to be as good as was initially expected, and now WMG is getting angry about the widespread use of its content on the site and the low revenue it is receiving for it. It has indicated that when the current deal is up, it will seek a new agreement with MySpace Music or pull its music from the service completely.

The fact that advertising is doing worse than was expected might signal that MySpace Music is not doing very well at all. It already has some measures in place to cut costs, such as a prompt after playing four songs that asks a user if they are still there. If the service is a financial hole for MySpace, there is only so long it will go on before they decide to drop it.

<Dave Matthews gives away music using Twitter >French parliament will vote again on anti-piracy law

7 user comments

115.4.2009 11:55

rosedog

Send private message to this user

Member

WWWWWWWWHhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!.........

Greedy b*st*rds

215.4.2009 13:52

maddog68

Send private message to this user

Newbie

Do they want some cheese with that whine. They shouldn't be so greedy.

315.4.2009 14:28

beanos66

Send private message to this user

Member

how many times have artists gone to their labels and said "I should be getting more royalties than this"?

Ha! is what I say

415.4.2009 16:18

imnomyth

Send private message to this user

Junior Member

How about this...artists/publishers get paid only for concerts and album sales/downloads. This will be a high percentage for the artist of course, but the radio and other sources that use their music should just be considered as an advertisement towards their sales. SCREW these endless royalties!!!

515.4.2009 16:35

5fdpfan

Send private message to this user

Member

"It has indicated that when the current deal is up, it will seek a new agreement with MySpace Music or pull its music from the service completely"

Great stragegy Warner. Play hardball with Myspace, who themselves are saying they're not seeing much return on the deal either and see what that gets you. NO DEAL AT ALL! Yeah, charge myspace more for a service that's already unprofitable. And just how is that supposed to improve things any for them? NIcely for the labels maybe but it has to work to the benefit of both sides, not just one. It's the label's fault that this is even an issue in the first place. IF the greedy f%%%s wouldn't charge everyone a king's ransom to license their music for things both legitimate, but mostly absurd, this wouldn't be happening The artists ultimately are the ones who, until they decide to go on their own or to a smaller label, are and will continue to suffer the most from this petty squabbles. 99 cent songs are too cheap and apparently teh millions of folks who listen to and know about their favorite bands on a daily basis doesn't amount to enough profit either. Too friggin bad! Be happy with what you make(and steal from your artists)and shut the heck up or continue hopelessly wasting thousands on lawyers to sue the "pirates". It's up to you.

This message has been edited since its posting. Latest edit was made on 15 Apr 2009 @ 4:38

615.4.2009 20:06

bomber991

Send private message to this user

Member

I wonder how much money they expected to make? They probably get like 5 to 10 cents every time someone clicks on an advertisement. And then how many people have to look at an ad before it gets clicked on? I'd say probably for every 1,000 views there's 1 click. So WMG is probably getting pissed off that they're only making 5 to 10 cents for every 1,000 song plays. Now I don't know what kind of royalty rates there are for other services like radioplay, but I'm guessing it's higher than that.

715.4.2009 21:03

kikzm33z

Send private message to this user

Senior Member

Not too surprised.

Warner Music Group is definitely hated by the majority of YouTube users, now they're doing this crap with MySpace? Wow.

Comments have been disabled for this article.

	Netflix buys HBO and Warner Bros studios (05 Dec 2025 8:04) Netflix has won the bidding competition for media giant Warner Bros and will acquire HBO as well as the Warner Bros film studios.
	Massive Android 0-day vulnerability found - here's what you should do immediately (08 Nov 2025 5:35) A very serious security flaw has been found in the Android operating system, allowing malicious code to be executed on a phone or tablet.
	Review: Roborock Saros Z70 - robot vacuum with an arm (20 Oct 2025 6:13) In out in-depth review of Roborock Saros Z70 we put the robot vacuum through a 3 month test period, where we observed its work in normal home. The sci-fi -like arm of Z70 was a little bit disappointing, due its limited functionality.
	End of an era: TiVo stops making DVRs (14 Oct 2025 4:12) TiVo, once synonumous with digital TV recording in the United States and in select other countries, has stopped making DVR devices as of October, 2025.
	Strava takes Garmin to court (02 Oct 2025 2:30) The world's perhaps best-known sports app developer Strava has filed a lawsuit against American sports watch manufacturer Garmin, accusing the company of patent infringement. 1 user comment

	Guide: Phone battery drains quickly - how to fix (iPhone / Android) In this guide, we go through the most typical reasons for rapid battery drain with phones, and look at potential reasons or solutions.
	Does your phone rattle? Here's why it happens When you shake your phone and hear a light rattle, clatter, or jingle, it's likely not broken. The culprit is probably the optical image stabilization (OIS) system in your phone's camera, meaning everything is functioning as it should. 2 user comments
	GUIDE: Wi-Fi speeds are slow? Here are some tips Having problems with Wi-Fi speed and stability at home? Here are some tips to follow to alleviate the issues. 1 user comment
	Guide: Is Your Wi-Fi Sluggish or Slow? Here's How to Fix Do you have problems with you Wi-Fi? Slow connection or is it cutting off constantly? This guide aims to remedy these problems. 1 user comment
	What IP rating for dust and water resistance means An IP classification (such as IP68) is given to mobile phones, Bluetooth speakers, and other devices, but what do these classifications mean? 1 user comment

Warner Music regrets MySpace Music deal

7 user comments

Latest news

Reviews

Guides

News archive

Subscribe

Sections:

Follow us:

	Review: Roborock Saros Z70 - robot vacuum with an arm In out in-depth review of Roborock Saros Z70 we put the robot vacuum through a 3 month test period, where we observed its work in normal home. The sci-fi -like arm of Z70 was a little bit disappointing, due its limited functionality.
	Roborock Saros 10 review - Great, but not perfect We tested Roborock Saros 10 robot vacuum for more than two months in order to see whether it is really worth its hefty price tag. The mopping, self-emptying Saros 10 was mostly great, even perfect. But its object avoidance was bit disappointing. 1 user comment
	Roborock S8 MaxV Ultra review - obstacle avoidance doesn't work as it should, otherwise almost perfect robot vacuum We put the Roborock S8 MaxV Ultra through a very, very long review process. The $1800 mopping robot vacuum is almost perfect, but its obstacle avoidance was surprisingly bad, considering the price - and compared to its competitors.