User User name Password  
   
Thursday 15.5.2008 / 10:41 AM
Search:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > the mpaa wants $15 million from the pirate bay
Show topics
News
News

The MPAA wants $15 Million from The Pirate Bay

8 May 2008 18:15 by Andre "DVDBack23" Yoskowitz | 26 comments

The MPAA wants $15 Million from The Pirate Bay The MPAA has announced that is suing the infamous torrent tracker The Pirate Bay for $15.4 million USD citing "damages suffered" from 4 movies and 13 TV episodes uploaded to the tracker.

The movies in question are "Harry Potter 5", "Syriana", "The Pink Panther" and "Walk the Line" and all 13 episodes are from the hit show "Prison Break". The MPAA is demanding $37 USD for each download of "Syriana", "The Pink Panther" and "Walk the Line", $43 USD for Harry Potter and $68 for Prison Break.

The Pink Panther was downloaded 49,593 times by Pirate Bay users, making it the most popular, while Syriana was the least popular with 3,679 downloads, according to MAQS, the law firm which is representing the MPAA in the case.

Brokep, a TPB admin, had this to say about the matter; “They know they are losing, and try to make us look like big criminals by adding some zeros to a claim for a made-up crime.”

“The worst thing is that I lost 100 kronor on a bet on the number they would come up with,”
Brokep added. “And, it sucks that they didn’t claim more than for Napster and the other sites. It’s cooler to break the record.”

When an MPAA lawyer was asked whether she really believed every download was equivalent of a lost sale, she replied, “We don’t know that, but the copyright law doesn’t care about that. It says that if you have downloaded something illegally, you must pay regardless, if you would’ve bought it or not.”

More on the matter when the case finally gets to court.

Permalink to this article | Topic:

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • MPAA awarded $110 million in TorrentSpy suit (8 May 2008)
  • 'Mass Effect' to have terrible DRM (7 May 2008)
  • New York wants stricter punishments for film pirates (6 May 2008)
  • Crysis maker abandons PC exclusivity, citing piracy (1 May 2008)
  • Australian police bust piracy ring (28 April 2008)
  • Pirate Bay hits 12 million peers (26 April 2008)
  • Key witness against The Pirate Bay was employed by plaintiff (21 April 2008)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    RIAA representative forecasts a comeback for DRM
    Next news article »
    Apple brings iPhone to Latin America
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article!  There are more user comments available, read them here
    ThePastor (Junior Member) 8 May 2008 18:24 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    “We don’t know that, but the copyright law doesn’t care about that. It says that if you have downloaded something illegally, you must pay regardless, if you would’ve bought it or not.”

    TPB never downloaded anything so I guess this doesn't apply. They've already lost this case.
    corn (Senior Member) 8 May 2008 18:26 Send private message to this user   
    The files arn't hosted on the server, only the .torrnet files are. So, really what is TPB doing wrong? Why don't they go after the uploaders?
    varnull (Senior Member) 8 May 2008 18:58 Send private message to this user   
    Yeah.. habeus corpus applies.. the mpaa have already lost this one.

    TPB should counter sue for harassment and illegal bullying and punitive malicious litigation. It's BS and we all know it..




    http://designetc.net/mpaa.jpg

    No link as required under the GPL...... makes the mpaa software thieves.



    Free open source software = made by end users who want an application to work....

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 8 May 2008 18:59

    emugamer (Junior Member) 8 May 2008 19:01 Send private message to this user   
    And what if half the people downloading them actually bought them? Didn't the movie industry see a really good year in 2007 in terms of profits??
    iluvendo (Senior Member) 8 May 2008 19:05 Send private message to this user   
    What happened to duking it out in court ? For the MPAA to do this in the court of public media, they may very well be losing in the legal system.
    varnull (Senior Member) 8 May 2008 19:16 Send private message to this user   
    F--- the lot of em... all the profiteering scumbags.






    Free open source software = made by end users who want an application to work....
    engage16 (Member) 8 May 2008 20:36 Send private message to this user   
    i love how they double the price of the movie/ tv show... harry potter can be bought for $20, yet they're looking for $47? who's the pirates here? who's stealing from who?
    ChiknLitl (Member) 8 May 2008 20:48 Send private message to this user   
    I think they should go after all of the "criminals" that downloaded the pink panther! I hope it was at least the Peter Sellars version. And where the hell do they come up with these numbers, F--- all if they think I would pay $5 from the bargain bin for any of those movies.
    c1c (Member) 8 May 2008 23:01 Send private message to this user   
    More free publicity for the Pirate Bay which in turn creates new p2p users.
    mspurloc (Junior Member) 9 May 2008 1:50 Send private message to this user   
    KILL ALL THE LAWYERS.
    nobrainer (Member) 9 May 2008 2:49 Send private message to this user   
    name, shame and boycott all mpaa/riaa anti-consumer c**k suckers.

    *edit*

    OMG America it looks like the MPAA/RIAA lobby won, the pro IP Act sails through, Now Sony and co want your home and possessions for copywrite infringement. does the punishment fit the crime i wonder?

    House overwhelmingly passes controversial PRO-IP Act
    Originally posted by link:

    The bill would also enable law enforcement agents to seize property from copyright infringers.


    The BPI Are: SONY, UNIVERSAL, WARNER GROUP, EMI.
    The RIAA Soundexchange Are: SONY, UNIVERSAL, WARNER GROUP, EMI.
    The IFPI Are: The same anti consumer lot as listed above!
    The MPAA Are: SONY, UNIVERSAL, WARNER GROUP, DISNEY, PARAMOUNT, FOX.

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 9 May 2008 2:56

    pensfan12 (Newbie) 9 May 2008 3:17 Send private message to this user   
    i dont get why they want so much per movie? How does that even work?
    Shouldnt they be asking for like the price of a movie ticker per download?
    And you would hope it would only include American downloads.
    Oh well, they hopefully wont get a cent.
    cousinkix (Newbie) 9 May 2008 3:18 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    The bill would also enable law enforcement agents to seize property from copyright infringers.
    The same doesn't go for crooked employers who hire illegal aliens, under pay those slave laborers off the books and cheat on paying Social Security taxes. You are a frigging racist if you believe that these asset forfeiture laws should also apply to their favored kinds of criminals.

    Its just fine if some body grows marijuana or downloads a stinkinng MP-3 file; but not greedy corporate thieves who are ruining the US economy. Bill Gates prefers to import more cheap foreign laborers and pay them half of what Americans made as Microsoft employees. BOYCOTT VISTA.


    Quote:
    OMG America it looks like the MPAA/RIAA lobby won, the pro IP Act sails through, Now Sony and co want your home and possessions for copywrite infringement. does the punishment fit the crime i wonder?
    That corrupt US Congress just sits back, while lobbyist groups
    who finance their political campaigns, draft a deluge of laws to suit themselves. Comedians call them the Parliament of Whores for a good reason. Money influences just what kind of laws come out of that District of Criminals. Three of them want to be the next president. It makes me wanna throw up...

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 9 May 2008 3:26

    corn (Senior Member) 9 May 2008 6:40 Send private message to this user   
    Somebody bought it either way, heh. But, notice how they are making the MOST downloaded movie come with the largest fee? Bunch of bull shit. Nothing we can do, besides use PG2.


    viny1313 (Newbie) 9 May 2008 7:59 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by corn:
    Somebody bought it either way, heh. But, notice how they are making the MOST downloaded movie come with the largest fee? Bunch of bull shit. Nothing we can do, besides use PG2.



    LMAO nice pic ;)

    But really, not even PG2 can save you from the rath of a retarded govornment :P
    KennyD (Newbie) 9 May 2008 14:04 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    Originally posted by corn:
    Somebody bought it either way, heh. But, notice how they are making the MOST downloaded movie come with the largest fee? Bunch of bull shit. Nothing we can do, besides use PG2.



    LMAO nice pic ;)

    But really, not even PG2 can save you from the rath of a retarded govornment :P
    True but it does help a little :)
    Tsusai (Newbie) 9 May 2008 14:41 Send private message to this user   
    Too bad they don't see that they are suing a a group of people who hold a library Rolodex of stuff, nothing more, nothing less.
    corn (Senior Member) 9 May 2008 14:46 Send private message to this user   
    Nah, they see money. They don't see us as people who don't wanna pay $15+ for a new movie, or pay $10.00 for a movie ticket. They see a lawsuit, and a family forced into bankruptcy. Another life ruined thanks to the MPAA.
    rob0t3ch (Inactive) 9 May 2008 15:19 Send private message to this user   
    Sorry big wigs but TV shows are fair game to EVERYONE in the world. There isn't a soul that would agree with the MPAA regarding FREE tv shows on P2P. They get broadcast for free and according to the FCC rules and regulation..............."For every signal sent, anyone and everyone has the right to intercept that signal".
    RNR1995 (Newbie) 9 May 2008 15:40 Send private message to this user   
    Isn't the Pirate Bay in another country?
    How can they be sued in the USA
    this is ridiculous
    corn (Senior Member) 9 May 2008 16:17 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by rob0t3ch:
    Sorry big wigs but TV shows are fair game to EVERYONE in the world. There isn't a soul that would agree with the MPAA regarding FREE tv shows on P2P. They get broadcast for free and according to the FCC rules and regulation..............."For every signal sent, anyone and everyone has the right to intercept that signal".
    I've always thought about that, but thought I was wrong. Guess I was right, hehe.
    rlessmue (Newbie) 9 May 2008 19:00 Send private message to this user   
    So let me see if I got this right.
    If a link was put on the MPAA site and if you clicked on it,
    and you were sent to another site which downloaded "something
    illegally" - would that require the MPAA have to pay - due to the
    breaking of the copyright law??

    And, when does American laws apply to The Pirate Bay... they are not located in America.

    ...and the price for Harry Potter 5... $43USD??!!! MPAA your math is
    wrong...check out Amazon.com BEFORE it was discounted $34.99 list!!
    http://www.amazon.com/Harry-Potter-Phoen...l/dp/B00005JPI2
    Cheers!
    skopas (Junior Member) 9 May 2008 19:12 Send private message to this user   
    Mpaa lost when TPB said, "it does not host the actual files on their servers". They act like a search engine thats all. Fricken MPAA, they want respect and lots of MONEY..................MONEY...... those days are over. Ask the artist of the 70', 80's and 90's how much money they lost to them. NOw with the internet age everything has changed and now the ball is in our court.
    fgamer (Member) 9 May 2008 19:20 Send private message to this user   
    The MPAA really makes themselfs look like a joke when they file retarded lawsuits that don't really help their cause, but instead only brings more attention to piracy..which then more people realize that they dont have to pay a dime and can just download it. So thank you MPAA for bringing more attention to something that will never die AND that's piracy!

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 9 May 2008 19:20

    Hardwyre (Newbie) 13 May 2008 14:13 Send private message to this user   
    ... and another round of Peer-to-peer whack-a-mole!

    This is like suing the car companies for providing the radio that someone used to record a copyrighted song off of.
    corn (Senior Member) 13 May 2008 16:39 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by Hardwyre:
    ... and another round of Peer-to-peer whack-a-mole!

    This is like suing the car companies for providing the radio that someone used to record a copyrighted song off of.
    LOL! Thats good. Did that really happen?
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums | DVD X Copy Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi | fin.MP3Lizard.com
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2008 by AfterDawn Ltd.