User User name Password  
   
Saturday 21.11.2009 / 09:10 AM
Search AfterDawn.com:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > u.s. house of representatives votes to boost penalties for online piracy
Show topics
News
News

U.S. House of Representatives votes to boost penalties for online piracy

28 September 2004 16:50 by James "Dela" Delahunty | 3 comments

U.S. House of Representatives votes to boost penalties for online piracy The U.S. House of Representatives voted to boost penalties for online piracy. The Piracy Deterrence and Education Act (PDEA) will make it easier for federal investigators to convict file-swappers. It also criminalizes unauthorized recordings made in movie theaters and encourages the Department of Justice to target Internet copyright infringements more. "Millions of pirated movies, music, software, game and other copyrighted files are now available for free download from suspect peer-to-peer networks," said Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, who heads a copyright subcommittee. "This piracy harms everyone, from those looking for legitimate sources of content to those who create it." Both the MPAA and RIAA are strong supporters of the bill.

Earlier in the day opponents to the bill had mounted an unsuccessful attempt to urge House leaders to remove the Piracy Deterrence and Education Act from the floor schedule. Letters signed by groups including four library associations, the American Conservative Union, the National Taxpayers Union, and Public Knowledge argued that the measure would "radically expand the scope" of copyright liability and divert $15 million in federal funds from the war on terror to "protecting Hollywood's and Big Music's parochial interests."

The bill punishes P2P users that distribute over $1,000 of pirated material with penalties from prison terms up to three years to fines of up to $250,000. If it became law, prosecutors would not have to prove that $1,000 in copyrighted materials was actually downloaded; they would need to show only that those files had been publicly accessible in a shared folder. With Tuesday's vote, the legislation now goes to the Senate, which has not yet held hearings on it.

Source:
News.com


Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • Schwarzenegger deals serious blow to California file-sharers (22 September 2004)
  • Decriminalize file-sharing with taxes? (22 September 2004)
  • 11 charged over piracy busts (17 September 2004)
  • Lawmakers will vote on spyware and piracy bills next week (3 September 2004)
  • LAPD busts DVD pirates (3 September 2004)
  • Piracy group resurrects after being raided (3 September 2004)
  • Major piracy busts in Poland (25 August 2004)
  • U.S. Senate passes PIRATE act bill (30 June 2004)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    JupiterResearch: Digital music sales won't replace CDs
    Next news article »
    Tech firms rally against Induce Act
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    zombieman (Member) 28 September 2004 17:35 Send private message to this user   
    I still say someone needs to come up with a virus that scans computers for any type of media, and then shares the files over a perticular network. At least that way there would a alibi for the defendents. It would'nt take long before defendents that were simply infected with this "share-virus" began poping up in these lawsuits. How knows, maybe one of the congressman or attorneys would pop up in a lawsuit eventually. Atleast the simple existence of this virus would make a possible loophole.
    Dela (Staff Member) 28 September 2004 22:59 Send private message to this user   
    @zombieman - well, that is until of course they macth the hash id of the file in question with the hash id of the a particular file on the P2P network and ask the simple question, where did u get the pirated file in the first place??? so that throws the aliby possibility right out the window.

    Actually writing a share virus would do more harm than good....

    1. It would discredit P2P even further, laws would be pushed thropugh the legal system easier, in the end, a lot of countries may see P2P file sharing criminalized altogether.

    2. It would be extremely dangerous if it infected a lot of PC's as some more malicious versions of the virus could appear, using the same spreading techniques as the original, but with a lot more firepower in it.

    3. Some innocent old men and women who have an internet service with a monthly upload limit could end up with a huge bill after their PC uploaded 300GB or so of their country music their sons/daughters ripped to the PC for them, so lets say the limit for month of upload was 20GB, and they uploaded 300GB at premium rate, lets say something like 3c a MB, works out at about $8400


    there's just some examples of why this isnt a good idea :-)

    Other idea's exist, like the possibility of P2P2P - which is uploader --> idle bandwidth of another filesharer --> downloader. This seems like a safer approach as if the downloader was lets say the RIAA, they wouldn't get the source IP address and would have no case since i dont believe its illegal to setup some sort of proxy server to be accessed by general public (eg, other filesharers????). It would depend on fast connections so sorry 56k, you're out of that one :-)

    Another is P2P groups, where it is merely you and your buddys on your own little P2P network sharing files/streaming music with each other. A network exists known as Grouper that does just that!
    fusionz (Inactive) 29 September 2004 23:15 Send private message to this user   
    well there is only one way to finish it all- do not buy any music , movies for some time. then companies will beg to pass a law which will allow to share files. there is some trends going on, what these more-profit companies don't notice- tendency to get not paid, or paid- illegal stuff, but opensource or freeware. on my computer as of today there is only 5 % or less paidware(paid software which came with my computer, including OS). everything else is opensourceware or freeware. and gess what- i never regret that. good example- find me something better than archivating software like freeware TUGZip or IZArc.

    -------
    with movies and music a little bit different. still now i am looking for some artists, which encourage downloading their songs. before cd purchase i carefully inspect cd if it wasn't published by RIAA. i don't buy such cd's.

    i think that it is time for other companies to sue their customers too- for example- brand X restaurant can sue customers, who infringe with their trademark hamburgers because such customers make something similar at home....:)
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2009 by AfterDawn Ltd.