Personally I dont think downloading should be illegal or is illegal because first of all its only a problem because the RIAA and MPAA seen how profitable this could've been if they thought of it first. Thats why you see some of your favorite sites getting took down and the same site they adjusted with a fee you have to pay in order to use it. It's all BS and they are greedy and will continue to be greedy as long as Hollywood and the Music Industry get bigger. There isnt any real good music or quality music out like it used to be years ago. You go to the store and buy a cd and its like 1 maybe 2 songs on the whole cd thats good and they want you to pay $14-$20+ for those crappy cd's its crazy.

movie studios hate priacy for two reasons: it costs them money (a lot of money, lets not kid ourselfs) and it threatens the very nature of media delivery. if file sharing becomes legal there will be a very turbulant transitional period for the large media companies. they will break into a thousand little companies and it will be more of an every man for himself type deal. if file sharing is legalized movies and music will not disapear.

a long long time ago a company called bell labs, then owned by at&t invented a devise called a television. at&t and bell labs couldnt figure out how to make money off this stupid device because it got its signal from airwaves, at&t was use to charging per conection. they couldnt figure out how to make money off of it so they sold the technology. the people that bought the technology figured out that they could make loads of money off of advertising.

if file sharing becomes legal this is what will happen: there will be a million and one mom and pop movie and tv show studios popping up. they will distribute their content for free from websites. the websites will also have advertising and im sure the programs will have inbedded advertising. they will distribute their content from websites because they wil be able to upload a load faster than any p2p network. people will use it rather than p2p cause they will be able to get it super fast and not have to upload plus they will know it suports the makers and they wont have to search around for it.

companies that use to much placed advertising, too complex of a membership sign up, or just make crappy stuff will die out, people that make quality stuff wil thrive and make money. large media companies wont be able to make the loads of money they are used to and will be unable to sustain themselfs and will split into a thousand peices (can you say media ownership overhaul, dems?).

the reason america fights pircay so hard is because we make so much money from media production. ok, bollywood makes more movies than us, but the rest of the world doesnt give a shit about their 3 hour musicals. the rest of the world is adicted to american tv and movies, they love our stuff. if we legalize file sharign in our own country then america will have one less thing to make loads of money on, and well be one step closer to being chinas bitch.

I dont really agree with the last comment because if that was the case people could still do it now. People are downloading/uploading all sorts of media on the net whether its their stuff or other peoples. As i was saying on my last post you really have to look at the big picture and its all about money. If you think about look at how many people use the internet then look at how many people download stuff then look at it from the MPAA and RIAA's side its a excellent source for marketing if they stop all the free downloading sites and replace them with sites they can control and gain a new profit from. over the last 8years and how P2P has grown they want a big piece of that pie and the only way to get it is to chase away as many of the people who make these free sites and dominate with their own. Every P2P site thats up that has a fee they own them and control the content on them. Free sites they dont so its all a means of divide and conquer so if you really think that they are losing money you gotta be out of your mind to think that. People still go out to the movies including me. People still go to stores and buy music and dvd's. They put way to to much emphasis on paying these actors millions of dollars to do nothing at all and 80% of these musicians to talk about nothing. Point being they are EXTREMELY greedy and they want to get every nickel and dime out of people no matter if they sell you crap. I know i wont buy it if its rather poopy if its available for download.

First of all, people say the MPAA is loosing money. This is far from true they are just putting a spin on their situation to drive their piracy propaganda, which is something they need to curve of course to stay alive. What they don’t want to show is that a small amount of piracy can actually help them sell more as a form of advertising.

Second, they say that box office sales are down and their loosing money. Again this is not totally true as box office may be down, DVD sales is WAY up so they are getting it on the back side instead of up front.

Third, stealing isn’t necessarily a "very serious offense” as quoted above. If I steal a gum ball versus a Hum-V is stealing the gum ball a "very serious offense”, I think not. Let’s not exaggerate the situation.

Forth, both the MPAA and RIAA have monopolies which go against the no monopoly clause our government has place upon us but unfortunately big money talks louder then us common people. Ask any artist what they think about their governing body and you get a picture of how bad the Movie and Music industry represses and STEALS from the artists. I loved it when the RIAA went after non-profit web sites promoting artists trying to make it in the industry.

In summation I’m not for theft but it is ludicrous what the industry gets away with so if people get away with stealing some of that back more power to them, just don’t get caught because the judicial system likes big money.

To Hollywood and the recording indsutry... F@#K off! If you want to blame anybody for so called illegal downloading blame Bill Gates, Al Gore, or broadband ISPs. Don't blame us. We get ripped off by you people all the time. I think that paying $9 for a movie, $5. for popcorn and $3. for pop and not allowing us to bring in our own snacks, or making us pay for our music again and again each time a new format comes out is screwing us, so we are just returning the favor and screwing you back! I hope you guys go out of business real soon. I know that you guys hate illegal downloading, and if you guys are o.o.b. you won't have to worry about it anymore, and we'll just entertain ourselves then! It's funny that many citizens and politicians are claiming that the big oil is price gouging us, but nobody is pointing any fingers at Big Hollywood or the recording industry. I wonder why?

How many times have you bought an album on the strength of the single and the albums crap!
Same goes for dvd rentals you cannot take it back and say can I have my money back it was rubbish.
I download to try it, if I like it I buy the cd or dvd.

I think 5-year-olds who download cartoons illegally should be hung on the courthouse steps!!! That way, we can nip this piracy in the BUD! :-D

Honestly,

I don't see what all the damn fuss is about...I swear, MPAA and RIAA are just trying to launch these scare tactics of sorts.

I, like most of you, don't think that downloading is illegal...I mean, hell, just because I d/l'ed some music that I didn't have to be like $20 bucks for for only 2 songs that I will actually listen too and/or get a movie that I have wanted to see, it isn't what you call a serious offense. Now murdering someone is a serious offense!

If you ask me, d/l'ing songs and movies isn't hurting the companies, they are just pissed because they are just money grubbing idiots. If I were them, I would focus more on helping the homeless or something useful.

As far as that last statement:

Quote:

---

"Otherwise file-sharing will continue to thrive,"

---

Sorry about bursting your bubble, but it isn't going anywhere...just going to grow and grow and grow.

V

Yeah. We think that silly stuff like murder, robbery and other pranks are SERIOUS offenses. How could we have been so stupid.

I remember when a first run movie was 50 cents and I'm just a middle aged guy. That shows you how movie prices are over inflated now.

as one comment said, the industries are losing a lot of money from piracy!?! no! thats so wrong, simple fact is with most file sharers; if they couldn't download the movie what so ever they wouldn't pay for it at all!

its as simple as that. who is to say just because i download 'x' film, that if i couldn't download it i would of gone out and bought it!? that makes no sense.

people download because its there, and its easy as that.

If a movie is good, I buy it (or rather watch it in a cinema). If I don't have money for it, I wish that I was't feed the MPAA with that. And of course, if a director can makes a good movie, I don't want to pay a stupid actor's house in Malibu. So the easyest ways would be donation pages. An actor's work would be to impress the audience, so it will pay for his work.

This constant complaining over illegal download losses the studios have incurred has taken on the characteristics of an Urban Legend. It may have been true at one time but not any more.

Considering that most of the major file share services have been shut down, it's damn difficult to find a site with any kind of selection, not to mention one that is close enough to the primary pipe to offer any real speed. I have a high speed DSL connection to the Internet, via my ISP: AT&T, and past attempts to download large files, from now defunked services such as EDonkey, took several hours.

Another issue is streaming, anyone who has tried to view legal content on-line such as video from Google, You Tube, or C-Span knows how choppy the service is and normal operation requires several annoying restarts. I’ve worked with these companies when they were installing DSL and the name of the game is money, serving the most customers with the least equipment. Typical network architecture is ripe for congestion without imposing severe service restrictions to reduce long delays to any one customer.

I have no doubt that AT&T and other large telecommunications firms are not conforming to the rules of Net Neutrality, the current US Government agencies that monitor these things are way to cozy with the corporate world and have no incentive to go after a behemoth like AT&T.

I find it's easier to pay $16 a month to Blockbuster for 2 movies at a time through the mail, never have to leave the house. I make a copy and return it to them. Everybody gets their cut and I have a copy that I can watch as many times as I want !

mufin_man ,

I have a BB acct. For $16 a month to have 6 movies at a time every week or so is fantastic. To download current DVD's wouldn't be worth it for me.

Most of the file sharing services have not been shut down. With more cropping up every day. A lot of people use p2p for screeners. And ts-cams too but they usually suck.

To get good DL speed you have to know how. There is an art to it, or so I've heard :)

^^bittorrent is the key to good speeds!
well an established bittorrent community should i say

"Considering that most of the major file share services have been shut down, it's damn difficult to find a site with any kind of selection, not to mention one that is close enough to the primary pipe to offer any real speed. I have a high speed DSL connection to the Internet, via my ISP: AT&T, and past attempts to download large files, from now defunked services such as EDonkey, took several hours. "

you are kidding right? more titles are available than ever before. it is easier and faster than ever before.

You need to sit at the kids table next family holiday! the 14-years old will clue you in!

"I’ve worked with these companies when they were installing DSL and the name of the game is money, serving the most customers with the least equipment. Typical network architecture is ripe for congestion without imposing severe service restrictions to reduce long delays to any one customer."

As far as net congestion tha tis atotal fallacy. I;ve worked with these companies since we went from 300 baud and you are hearing what was said when we 300 baud to 1000 times the number of customers at 4800, or a 20,000x increase in throughput on the same copper in the space of three years!

When I started the upper limit of perceived consumer use was 1200 baud as this was the fasted a human could read an ascii stream!

If anything we are getting faster at delivering infastructure and throughput. by the time hd is as ubiquitous as hd typical household throughut will be 100 to 500 mps

I'm happy that there is some people in the USA with common sense in regards to these kinds of issues. When they break box office records after records i think it should be avaliable for download.

And all this time I thought sharing was caring. Could I be wrong???

I believe in intellectual property rights, however the internet offers a new avenue of sharing music, movies etc. freely amoung peers. For those in the industry this is just another venue and they should be paid their fair share. How about an open license (cheap) to download, use and burn that goes into a common pot to be distributed to rights holders based on popularity or other such measurement. Those who use P2P or any other method to download pay no cost except the standard cut a rights owner gets (not the distibutors fees). This would give something to creators and eliminate the excessive markups most distributors want and give greater exposure to the creators. Some sort of balance and common sense is needed to maintain freedom and protect rights without excessive controls and punishments.

BluesJack...listening to the blues; it makes me happy!

This is an old arguement and I aggree with many here with regards to the blatant contradictions that the movie industry seems to stand behind. There could be no money loss due to piracy if the movie industry did not allow for blank DVD media to be sold which serves as the primary catalyst to DVD piracy being possible. Currently what I see as a mojor problem for the movie industry and it's still to be released to DVD movie titles are the abundance of screeners currently available in the streets on the so-called black market as well as college campuses.

I don't wish to mention specific titles but I can honestly say that practicly every popular title now advertised in the theaters are being peddled around town to my amazement. I was so shocked that I did some homework online and found out the origin as I had personally believed that hollywood had abandoned the practice of providing screeners to it's industry insiders for award consideration. I've read where Dolby owned CINEA has attempted to stream line the distribution process which I commend them for but they have apparently over sold their capabilities.

My question is, could they have provided to the authorized viewer another media to pre-view the screeners on other than standard DVD? Hell HD or Blu-ray would have been perfect as the watermarked original as of now could not be reproduced at least not in any mass fashion. Apparently people who benefit from viewing screeners legally turn out to be normal unaccountable people who hold in very low regard the importance of protecting the physical media which is somehow being leaked directly to the streets. I think too much is made of the likelyhood that downloading plays the major part in illegally distributing privately viewed and owned screeners.

Never in all my life have I seen so many Screener titles so widely available on the street? I travel by train and or bus to a from work and I pass countless peddlers who with the assistance of portable players play these titles for their would-be customers. The bottom line is someone in HollyWood is responsible, not some online surfer torrent site member. The weirdest thing I read was from 2004 where the studios behind the movie CRASH believed that the abundance of CRASH screeners served to favorable promote the film.

I believe the screeners could work if they (Hollywood) and it's movie companys immediately think of a new and more favorable disc or chip media to view the Screener. Another suggestion is to stop placing them in so many viewers hands for private in home viewing where the special licensed DVD equipment and standard DVD media can be illegally manipulated. This is where Hollywood is taking the biggest hit as screeners apparently are made available while a given movie title is still in the theater and long before the movie title is available for legal private purchase and home viewing.

The way it is currently going they (Hollywood) could just send authorized person or persons private screening movie tickets.:P Just my two cents, I hope someone heeds my advice.:P

I've never understood what the difference is if I download an movie from a P2P network, or record it from TV, HBO, etc. Many years ago, we audiotaped music from the radio. What's the difference? I could understand if I sold it, but for home use only, what's the difference between that and VCR/DVD recorders? For years, I used my VCR to time-change for my viewing schedules. Jim

you know what's sad? We generally download more than we have time to watch. If d/l one movie equals 30 days in jail, imagine the sentence someone running a major distro site would get. If I ever hear a friendly knock at the door & I see guys with dark coats & UZIs standing outside, my DVD collection is hitting the fireplace!! LOL

Quote:

---

I see guys with dark coats & UZIs standing outside, my DVD collection is hitting the fireplace!! LOL

---

Most of the time they don't knock they kick the door down.....lol

---

Originally posted by xhardc0re:

---

you know what's sad? We generally download more than we have time to watch. If d/l one movie equals 30 days in jail, imagine the sentence someone running a major distro site would get. If I ever hear a friendly knock at the door & I see guys with dark coats & UZIs standing outside, my DVD collection is hitting the fireplace!! LOL

---

It would take me 30 days straight just to watch all the movies I have. Between BB's 6 out at a time (in store program now) and p2p, it's getting out of hand. I still haven't watched Transporter 2.

The other poster mentioned no difference between p2p and recording a movie from TV. I agree. Aside from the location of the media when you retrieve it; just what is the difference???

---

The next thing that the RIAA will go after is your TV viewing rights. They will get the courts to allow them into your homes so that they can inventory your TVs, DVRs, radios, VCRs, Computers, etc. And then they will want to charge you $5.00 per month for each to protect their earnings. That way they will beter enabled to suport their glutanous drug induced lifestyle.

How come nobody gripedwhen we taped music off of the radio? Then, cam VCR's for home use, and taping from premium channels. The next logical step is the Internet. What's the dif?