User User name Password  
   
Saturday 6.9.2008 / 01:45 PM
Search:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > florida woman accuses riaa of fraud, extortion and conspiracy
Show topics
News
News

Florida woman accuses RIAA of fraud, extortion and conspiracy

5 June 2007 7:55 by James "Dela" Delahunty | 14 comments

Florida woman accuses RIAA of fraud, extortion and conspiracy Yet another defendant in a copyright infringement case brought by the Recording Industry Association of America's (RIAA) crackdown on file sharing has decided to fight back with strong accusations. Suzy Del Cid has filed a counterclaim against the trade group that mirrors one filed by Tanya Andersen in October 2005. UMG v. Del Cid is being heard in the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

Del Cid has accused the RIAA of computer trespass, conspiracy, extortion, and violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act in her counterclaim. It claims that, "these record companies hired unlicensed private investigators—in violation of various state laws—who receive a bounty to invade private computers and private computer networks to obtain information—in the form of Internet Protocol ('IP') addresses—allowing them to identify the computers and computer networks that they invaded."

Of course, if Del Cid had a shared folder on KaZaa, she may have a hard time convincing the court that MediaSentry trespassed. However, she did allege that the RIAA used private investigators unlicensed by the state of Florida to track her online activities in violation of Florida law. She also claims that the RIAA violated Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by "knowingly collecting an unlawful consumer debt," referring to the Settlement Support Center's attempts to settle the case before the lawsuit was filed.

Source:
Ars Technica


Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • RIAA beaten in court by Tanya Andersen yet again (17 January 2008)
  • RIAA trying to dodge legal fees after dropping case (18 October 2007)
  • Defendent argues "making files available" isn't infringement (20 August 2007)
  • Free radio may become a thing of the past (5 July 2007)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    Melodeo plans service based on iTunes playlists
    Next news article »
    Alienware offers Hangar18 HD Entertainment Center
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    DVDdoug (Junior Member) 5 June 2007 10:36 Send private message to this user   
    If Cid and Anderson can win and collect some money from the RIAA... enought money to make their lawyers happy, lawyers will be lining-up to sue the RIAA!
    spydah (Junior Member) 5 June 2007 12:04 Send private message to this user   
    Lady get em and I mean get they ass good. If more people hit them back they will have to back off or find a better way to deal with people they believe to be pirating. I could see if they said well we wont sue you unless you upload 100gigs something that would really matter but damn they be coming after people for a file that they believe is a pirated file. Thats just special in every sense of that word.

    This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 5 June 2007 12:34

    5c4ry_0p (Junior Member) 5 June 2007 13:26 Send private message to this user   
    Quote:
    Del Cid has accused the RIAA of computer trespass, conspiracy, extortion, and violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act in her counterclaim.
    Gotta love that woman.Go get those greedy bastards
    borhan9 (AfterDawn Addict) 5 June 2007 13:47 Send private message to this user   
    I am with everyone else here. Go get the nutters. Mayb this is like the Return of the Jedi.
    bobiroc (Member) 5 June 2007 14:06 Send private message to this user   
    This is all because the RIAA (and the MPAA for that matter) are afraid of the digital revolution. They know that people will be getting their music, movies, and TV shows digitally instead of buying them in stores. Since they cannot seem to embrace the technology and find a way to make it affordable and easy for consumers while still making a profit they will spend tons of money going after people that are allegedly downloading illegally.

    You hear all the time about how CD sales are down, DVD purchase are down, and Movie Theatre attendance is down. Well this is because people are using iTunes and other services to get their music and other multimedia. People are opting to do it that way more and more because it is convenient and easy. My only problem with the digital media services is that they are too expensive for what you are getting. You pay 99 cents for a song and you have restrictions, or you pay for a movie/tv show download and you can only watch it on your PC or it expires after a certain period of time. I think that since this is a digital file the price of these should be considerably less since it is not like they have physical media they are putting it on and many people can download the same file. Also at a buck a song you should own it and be able to move it and use it how you want to.
    jinggoy (Newbie) 5 June 2007 16:33 Send private message to this user   
    I'd love to see a digital revolution.
    WierdName (Senior Member) 5 June 2007 18:35 Send private message to this user   
    Sue their [bleep]s off.
    lxfactor (Senior Member) 5 June 2007 18:38 Send private message to this user   
    i wouldn't want to see a digital revo. blah too futuristic. i remember when people open trunks of hoods and sell u cds. now u gotta pay for Urls to where music is stored. whats become of the earth.
    spydah (Junior Member) 5 June 2007 18:47 Send private message to this user   
    I dont think its because they are afraid of evolution i think the main reasons for all this BS we see in these articles is, because people got fed up of paying for over priced crap via music, movies, software, and etc.... When the first P2P site hit and then some more came up they got scared they were gonna lose consumers which they did but they always had some of those same people still pay for stuff. But once they were able to take down the first few sites then it grew into something that they could not control. So what do they do. They took down the P2P sites like Napster, Morpheus, Kazaa, Imesh, and whole bunch of single file sites that were popular earlier and replaced them with either the same named sites then slapped a price tag on them to get control content which aint worth shit. If nobody has really noticed or payed attention to is they are still doing that now. There are now torrent sites the same way and now sites like youtube they all want to come out with their own version to lure you into their controlled content to keep grabbing more money out of your pocket. Its all about conquer and control. So as for the lady thats fighting back all power to you on that i hope you can get them for whatever you can.
    WierdName (Senior Member) 5 June 2007 21:57 Send private message to this user   
    Hopefully they will lose then realize that they should actually make sure that they actually know that the person committed the crime instead of going at people they THINK are guilty or people they gathered info from/for illegally.
    Blackjax (Member) 5 June 2007 22:58 Send private message to this user   
    Well I think this is just the start of the counter suit claims that are going to be filed against the mafiaa. THE only people truly winning in this p*ssing contest right now are the blood sucking lawyers. They are laughing all the way to the bank!
    edsrouter (Newbie) 5 June 2007 23:03 Send private message to this user   
    It's not like there's no monatary solution to this "digital revolution". There is, but the RIAA just doesn't want to accept it. They want to keep sueing to obtain the most profitable system in place. The RIAA could easily ask the U.S. Government for a technological solution for piracy, but they don't want government intervention. It's no wonder why when 80% of the revenue recieved is profit.
    wetsparks (Member) 8 June 2007 12:15 Send private message to this user   
    Originally posted by DVDdoug:
    If Cid and Anderson can win and collect some money from the RIAA... enought money to make their lawyers happy, lawyers will be lining-up to sue the RIAA!
    We can only hope. Best of luck to Ms. Del Cid.
    Unfocused (Junior Member) 23 July 2007 22:50 Send private message to this user   
    I'd be willing to bet that most people turn to illegal downloading because of the high prices in the stores.
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Last week's most popular software downloads

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums | DVD X Copy Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi | fin.MP3Lizard.com
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2008 by AfterDawn Ltd.