User User name Password  
   
Saturday 5.7.2008 / 01:04 AM
Search:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > news > movie studios and producers accused of screenplay theft
Show topics
News
News

Movie studios and producers accused of screenplay theft

31 May 2006 19:34 by James "Dela" Delahunty | 20 comments

Movie studios and producers accused of screenplay theft When you hear the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) talk about the effects Internet piracy has on the global films industry, you are guaranteed to hear about how movie downloaders are stealing from everyone involved in making movies. Hollywood studios call movie downloaders thieves for this act, but can they also be called thieves if they steal somebody else's work? Well, a growing number of cases are accusing studios and movie producers of stealing screenplays.

Reed Martin is responsible for just one of many lawsuits that have been aimed at Hollywood studios or people. He worked on his screenplay while he was working at Columbia University and New York University. After ten years he finally got his break when a Hollywood talent manager read and really enjoyed his script.

"And he agreed to send it around to actors in the industry," said Martin. "He asked me to make up a list of people I'd like to have in the film and I gave him my top choices -- among them Bill Murray -- and he said he'd try to make it happen for me." I can't imagine how good this could have made Martin feel. It would seem that his creative work was about to pay off - but he discovered that Hollywood had a few surprises in store for him.

Initially there was a lot of interest in his script, but all of a sudden, the phone stopped ringing. "I started to hear that a similar film was in production," he said. "And that I was potentially dead in the water." The film was Broken Flowers starring Bill Murray, who receives an anonymous pink letter informing him he has a son who might be looking for him. The film is about his journey to find 5 ex-girlfriends to see if he can figure out who sent it, and if there is any truth to the letter.

To Martin's horror, this plot and even the characters and scenes in the movie are almost identical to his screenplay. "When I saw the film," he said, "I was shocked to see that we have five girlfriends: one who has died, a former girlfriend who lives with bikers, another girlfriend who keeps a photograph of a Labrador retriever, the cat scene, the comedic nude scene of the film."

Along with his attorney, John Marder, of the Los Angeles law firm Manning and Marder, Martin filed suit again the director of Broken Flowers, Jim Jarmusch and Focus Features, which produced and distributed the film. Marder said that screenplays are stolen very frequently in Hollywood, and the thieves behind it can pretty much completely get away with their crimes.

"They simply exclude the writer -- the person that brought them this valuable property -- develop it themselves and then hide behind copyright," said Marder. "They say, 'Hey your ideas weren't protected, whether we stole them or not you have no claim.'" Unfortunately Federal copyright laws don't cover idea's, just the specific expression of an idea. So if you wanted to steal a screenplay, all you'd have to do is change a few details to get away with it.

However, a recent case involving the Miramax movie Rounders resulted in an interesting ruling by a California appeals court. The court ruled that while a stolen screenplay doesn't always amount to copyright infringement, it may be a breach of contract. "The court says you don't actually have to have a contract -- they're going to imply it," said Marder. "If you're a producer and you're meeting with an author to hear his idea, you're doing it because you want to buy it and you're going to pay for it."

Marder claims that Martin had an implied contract when he pitched his screenplay idea and the producers of Broken Flowers breached it by making an almost identical movie and not paying Martin for his work. The impact on Hollywood could be huge if a court will see eye to eye with Martin. Aaron Moss, an attorney with the Los Angeles firm Greenberg Glusker explains that not only screenplay thieves would be worrying.

"The concern is that if somebody pitches a script and the studio ends up making a movie that's not substantially similar -- and yet there are certain individual ideas that are the same -- are they going to be held liable?" said Moss. This case is definitely one to keep an eye on. A similar case involving the screenplay for The Last Samurai has also been filed and it's predicted that many more similar suits will appear soon.

I guess stealing is allowed in Hollywood if it benefits the movie studios.

Source:
MSNBC


Permalink to this article

Get AfterDawn's news to your favourite feed reader! Share this story with your friends!
 

 
Related articles:

  • Software pirate handed 7 year sentence (12 September 2006)
  • MPAA Wants to Blind Movie Pirates (20 June 2006)
  • In the Wake of The Pirate Bay (1 June 2006)
  • MPAA celebrates fall of The Pirate Bay (31 May 2006)
  • TorrentSpy accuses MPAA of hiring hacker (25 May 2006)
  • Torrentspy moves to dismiss MPAA suit (29 March 2006)
  • MPAA files lawsuits against BT, eD2K and NZB sites (27 February 2006)
  • MPAA sues auction pirates (15 February 2006)
  •  

    « Previous news article
    MPAA celebrates fall of The Pirate Bay
    Next news article »
    Next-gen WiFi technology to deliver IPTV around the home
     Post your comment
    Discuss this article! 
    nonoitall (Member) 31 May 2006 20:25 Send private message to this user   
    "Piracy is a crime unless we make money from ripping off someone else's story." Filthy hypocrites.
    babelfish (Member) 1 June 2006 2:51 Send private message to this user   
    for someone who has a number of screenplays in production im kinda worried about this. i mean how can i sell a screenplay if they can read it and ripoff the idea? why cant i copyright a screenplay? i can copyright a book!
    GrayArea (Member) 1 June 2006 7:08 Send private message to this user   
    babelfish

    "why cant i copyright a screenplay?"

    Is it true that a screenplay cannot be copyright???

    If that is really the case I'd think about writing stories in novel format.
    babelfish (Member) 1 June 2006 7:27 Send private message to this user   
    well, the above says so - if i can take a look at someone's screen play - totally ripoff the idea and there is no comeback. sounds dodgy to me. but as you say i will be doing the writing in a more prose/novel like approcah from now.

    i just dont see how copyright doesnt apply to screenplays? i mean you did that in a degree you would get booted out for plagarism?!?!?
    Steve83 (Member) 1 June 2006 10:18 Send private message to this user   
    Yes, screenplays (and ANY other intellectual property) can be copyrighted. But you have to pay an IP attorney to do it, and as that article says, it only applies to your SPECIFIC expression of your idea. If someone sees your idea & expresses it differently (even slightly), then your copyright doesn't cover THEIR specific expression of YOUR idea.

    So using that same logic - if I edit the IFOs of a DVD I'm backing up so it plays differently, haven't I expressed the idea (no matter whose it was) substantially differently?
    Leshy01 (Newbie) 1 June 2006 11:57 Send private message to this user   
    "So using that same logic - if I edit the IFOs of a DVD I'm backing up so it plays differently, haven't I expressed the idea (no matter whose it was) substantially differently?"

    Sure you can, but that's not the same logic. "By that logic" what you are doing is editing the movie and then you would claim the movie was created by you. You're still not allowed to break the protection on the disc. That's the problem.
    hans471 (Inactive) 1 June 2006 13:46 Send private message to this user   
    Hollywood lawyers will work overtime to cover the stealing done by producers because that is who pays them. The "Big Guys" in Hollywood think its OK for them to steal anything they can get by with. For years they cheated actors out of hugh sums of money until the actors got the money together to hire their own lawyers. They have done the same to writers forever.
    But when the shoe is on the other foot and you might be getting sometime of theirs they come after you with big guns.

    We know they are all slime balls, why would anyone be surprised by this? These guys have ego's a mile high. They don't have to follow the rules.

    No, I not surprised. I say stick it to them whenever you can.
    GrayArea (Member) 1 June 2006 13:50 Send private message to this user   
    The copyright boilerplate that I have seen (which is not much) typically contains "in whole or in part" language. I don't get it. That's some slippery sh!t. US patent law is so messed up that it allows patenting of "ideas", but IP law is so weak that the studios can steal ideas, copyright the resulting product and get away with it. The system is broke... and almost always in favor of the fat cats. Go figure.

    loubat (Junior Member) 1 June 2006 14:13 Send private message to this user   
    So... it's ok if they steal somebody's idea and make Millions of dollars off of it, but I were to make a copy a dvd and let my buddy watch, then I can go to jail/get heavily fined for *possible* lost revenue? Hmmm, yep our legal system is in great shape! :(
    sisph (Junior Member) 2 June 2006 1:38 Send private message to this user   
    Hmm.. Well, if I ever write a screenplay I'm going to get it copyrighted first. That way when they steal my work I can say that they better have proof they're not ripping off my script. If they can go to theatres I can always point back to the copyright and own them in court. Where's the harm in copyrighting a script that will never see the light of day? Better than the alternative.
    babelfish (Member) 2 June 2006 2:39 Send private message to this user   
    d00d - everyone knows the US judicial system is about as honest as their government elections. there is no way you can fight rich people in a court of law these days... sad fact but true...
    ZippyDSM (AfterDawn Addict) 2 June 2006 5:48 Send private message to this user   
    The joys of the elites they can rip off each other and even steal from thier pawns but god forbid the masses get thigns at a desent non bloated price....
    babelfish (Member) 2 June 2006 6:02 Send private message to this user   
    yup - bloody ripoff merchants - like why are DVDs twice the RRP that VHS was? even tho we all know DVDs are so much cheaper to produce and ship?!?!
    pavtchug (Newbie) 2 June 2006 6:25 Send private message to this user   
    having read some of bablefish's screenplay I must say they are quite crap. did I say crap sorry I meant original.... :) only kiddin BF
    having worked with the fish on several projects and I too am now bothered by the threat of seeing our hard labour end up on the big screen without our names in the credits..
    We have had to overcome copyright issues with other projects but never like this......
    Does anyone know of a way we can be protected??
    Is there some collective we can address with the problem?
    Saying that is there any wonder all new films are either sequels prequels or remakes..
    No decent writer dare show his s**t to anyone without fear of getting robbed.
    wonder how long it'll be before the monkeys of planet hollywood realise they are being fed the same old crap!! :)
    babelfish (Member) 2 June 2006 6:34 Send private message to this user   
    haha :) cheeky sod :)

    d00d they havent realised in 100+ years its the same old crap - problem is people keep buying the same old crap :)
    pavtchug (Newbie) 2 June 2006 6:46 Send private message to this user   
    yeah man, cos no new writers dare show folks their new ideas!!! LOL

    In one respect we are quite fortunate in knowing few amateur film makers, so we can have a go at making the films ourselves, then surely we have a stronger copyright case.... dont we?
    if so make a rough demo with a cam corder to go with ya script
    reckon we will all still get b*m r*ped in the end

    re
    Cinnjerm (Junior Member) 4 June 2006 21:04 Send private message to this user   
    "So using that same logic - if I edit the IFOs of a DVD I'm backing up so it plays differently, haven't I expressed the idea (no matter whose it was) substantially differently?"-

    LOL!!! Here's where i stand on this. I love movies. I spend well over 2 or 3 hundred dollars seeing movies in the theatre every year. If the MPAA get's mad at me for downloading a movie i already payed entirely too much money to see in the first place, they can kiss mine foreal. Sometimes i feel like a sexpot, and the american market is just trying to fornicate me. I wish artists in the movie and music industry would spend more time trying to make impressive work instead of trying to steal my money.
    InkSlingr (Newbie) 6 June 2006 5:24 Send private message to this user   
    Copyright Law only protects the 'work' that you take the trouble to apply for a copyright for. As a graphic artist I know from experience that this law is useless unless you can aford a very pricey lawyer to help you protect and enforce your copyright. Hollywood has for many years figured out that creative accounting keeps them from paying any taxes on their profits by figuring out ways to say they actually LOST money on films that grossed MILLIONS over what they actually cost. Why would you be surprised that they have learned to not only steal ideas and scripts from aspiring writers, but to have figured out that their corporate lawyers can use the very law you are holding up to them against you? They take credit for work that isn't their's and they wonder why we refuse to BUY replacement DVD's.
    Making a backup of movies you own doesn't hurt them. Selling backup copies in bulk as if they were originals does hurt them and should be illegal. They can't touch the black-market bootleggers, but they can touch us. So they take it out on everyone else with blanket lawsuits and intimidation that would make the Mafia proud.
    They can buy any politician to support them and they do. Most of these writers are wasting their time. They don't have the money or the time to fight a studio that only needs to spend 1% of the profit from a movie to kill these lawsuits.
    JohnT (Inactive) 15 September 2006 20:43 Send private message to this user   
    Eventually what goes around comes around. I am also waiting for the day when the RIAA gets the rug cut out from under them. Their conduct has been deplorable.
    hans471 (Inactive) 16 September 2006 9:28 Send private message to this user   
    Hey, this is real simple. Hollywood producers have the big money. I am sad to say that in today's world, "He who can hire the best lawyer wins". They can buy the legal system and they can buy the political system.

    I have no use for any of them. I check out the movies and music from my local library. Pretty soon they will figure out a way to make that illegal too.

    As I have said before, its all about GREED.
     Post your comment
     

    Subscribe to our newsfeed

    Get the latest headlines delivered directly to your favourite RSS reader or content aggregation service by using the links below.

    AfterDawn.com: News - RSS feed
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to MyMSN

    Search for headlines

    Search through our news archive.

    Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums | DVD X Copy Forums
    Music: MP3Lizard.com
    Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums
    Software: Software downloads
    Blogs: User profile pages
    RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
    International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | download.fi | fin.MP3Lizard.com
    Navigate: Search | Site map
    About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
    Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
     
      © 1999-2008 by AfterDawn Ltd.