RIM to lay off 2000 employees?

And once again stomp on the little guys instead of the top tier tightening their belts for a little while longer. Then lets not change our misguided ways - let's keep doing the same OCD behavior & catering to a fringe crowd instead of a broader base.

I get it, you have a cocaine habit that takes precedence over humanity & damn those that stand in your way. You came up with one brilliant idea that got the company rolling & change is bad. So why would you want to risk it all on a bad decision when deciding to do nothing will ruin everything just nicely?

Of course, the proclaimed economists will start correcting me - however, I know the economy is in the tank... RIM is for the most part pointed nose first for it's terminal shot for a swirly of death down the tubes.

If RIM knows they're going down, why not keep as many on the payroll until the last minute? It just seems humane. If they 'make it back', they're going to have to spend a huge sum just to get everything back on line to meet demand, which undermines the layoffs/mass firing to begin with.

Either way, it's elitist "I'm in control", "my money", "my ass is pampered" approach to business & it doesn't even make a good band-aid to the problem. It never did.

Originally posted by LordRuss:

---

And once again stomp on the little guys instead of the top tier tightening their belts for a little while longer. Then lets not change our misguided ways - let's keep doing the same OCD behavior & catering to a fringe crowd instead of a broader base.

I get it, you have a cocaine habit that takes precedence over humanity & damn those that stand in your way. You came up with one brilliant idea that got the company rolling & change is bad. So why would you want to risk it all on a bad decision when deciding to do nothing will ruin everything just nicely?

Of course, the proclaimed economists will start correcting me - however, I know the economy is in the tank... RIM is for the most part pointed nose first for it's terminal shot for a swirly of death down the tubes.

If RIM knows they're going down, why not keep as many on the payroll until the last minute? It just seems humane. If they 'make it back', they're going to have to spend a huge sum just to get everything back on line to meet demand, which undermines the layoffs/mass firing to begin with.

Either way, it's elitist "I'm in control", "my money", "my ass is pampered" approach to business & it doesn't even make a good band-aid to the problem. It never did.

---

Originally posted by SmaryJerry:

---

Not sure what you are rambling about. The company is failing and shrinking they already removed a lot of the top tier of employees you say are greedy or something? Your plan is to keep everyone until the company goes bankrupt? How about the other 14,000 still keep there jobs if RIM can make a come back.

---

Originally posted by LordRuss:

---

Originally posted by SmaryJerry:

---

Not sure what you are rambling about. The company is failing and shrinking they already removed a lot of the top tier of employees you say are greedy or something? Your plan is to keep everyone until the company goes bankrupt? How about the other 14,000 still keep there jobs if RIM can make a come back.

---

Keep everyone till they go bankrupt... to perpetuate stupidity in hopes to get a rise is childish... But for the rest of your analogy, I suppose I could agree with you.

The top tier that still have their (not there) jobs are the individuals that need replacing. I.e., the coke heads with ADD that don't want to change.

Then, what your comment is relating to about the remaining 14K employees is now lost on me. In my opinion, of course they would keep their jobs. They're (not there or their) the bread & butter behind getting the product designed, engineered, promoted & out the door for the RIM elitists after they take their collective thumbs out of their asses.

---

Originally posted by SmaryJerry:

---

That is exactly the stupidity I was pointing out in his post.. He said "If RIM knows they're going down, why not keep as many on the payroll until the last minute? "

---